D
Yeah - I docked Cam one because he was player hooker, and Jack gave up 2 penalties in the first half. Otherwise a pretty stellar defensive effort from the whole team - bench included.Damn the bench went 64-1-1 for tackles this game (McInnes, Hunt, Kaufusi, Williams)
That's pretty crazy
I’d say it would gas plenty of guys.That would gas over half our middle forwards
Cheers @BurgoShark . Maybe more an implication for our forwards workloads?Finally got around to finishing off the yardage comparison for the backs.
- Talakai doing more than anyone inside 40.
- Tracey at centre was very good on yardage.
- Interestingly, when Tracey played fullback he did a lot more overall work, but the majority of that kick returns or kit-ups midfield. He wasn't much more likely than Kennedy to take a hit-up inside 40 but was playing like an extra running forward once the team got out out their end.
View attachment 29994
@Sparkles this won't help you with Sharks players now that Tracey has left, but it might have some ramifications if he plays fullback at the Bulldogs. I'd say when Tracey plays fullback you are often going to see less midfield runs from the forwards (the dark blue).
Also interesting how even the coach can get caught up in the perception of how a guy played. When Connor got the medal against the Cowboys Fitz said something like "we kept getting pinned in our end and Connor just kept taking the hard runs out of there". In fact, he didn't do an above average amount of work in his end, but he took a very high amount of runs in midfield. He did more work in midfield than any player except McInnes. Those runs still count, but it's just an interesting observation in how even the coach can see something a little different than what actually went down.
If you were going to give a player a wrap for being a beast in his own end in that game, it should be Tom or Jack.
Tracey (less dark blue)
View attachment 29995
Kennedy (more dark blue for the forwards).
View attachment 29997
Not really. Must have had one on auto by mistake. I’ll fix it next time I’m on a Pc.Is there a reason the scales are different?
Unfortunately, at least on my end, appears to have broken the insert. Showing as a link now not showing actual image.@bort have adjusted that last post so the 3 graphs are all the same scale.
How about now?Unfortunately, at least on my end, appears to have broken the insert. Showing as a link now not showing actual image.
fixedHow about now?