The original report was from the ACC mate. ASADA may not have been able to use the ACC gained evidence and intel but I'm pretty sure the Ministers, Executive and Department Heads would have been privy to the non-redacted and sanitized ACC report.
ASADA Saga Thread
- Thread starter mattaus
- Start date
- Status
The original report was from the ACC mate. ASADA may not have been able to use the ACC gained evidence and intel but I'm pretty sure the Ministers, Executive and Department Heads would have been privy to the non-redacted and sanitized ACC report.
sharkstragic
Jaws
Play list
1. ASADAman
2. End of the Sharks
3. Hooperstinkbreath
4. Hotel Massoud
5. Paul Kent, Paul Kent!!
Feel free to add more
sharkstragic
Jaws
Cheers mate.. It's been so long you forget how it started. I still think politicians are masters of
Stuffing up things that should be a lay down mazaire. Not saying we are guilty btw
vicsharkfan
Jaws
Elvis Classic " u are always on my mind"
dylan the villian
Jaws
6. off to the clinic
This is the frustrating, ridiculous part. They should be able to and if they could, this would've been resolved 18 months ago.
I also believe if we had that info to act on we would have a FAR better club right now...
What mentality are you talking about?
I'm not suggesting that there was Powerade either - quite the opposite, but regardless Im curious about trying to convict/punish a group of people based on evidence surrounding individuals within the group as a whole...if there was specific evidence, it seems to me that it would have been acted on.
I may be biased, but on face value, this seems like a last throw of the dice for an investigation that cannot prove specifics...and...if this is the case and we had legal advice (which we do), the advice much surely be to say nothing?
I'm not taking sides here, but Tef was referring to the requirements for "onus of proof"
He was trying to explain how this is different from a criminal trial.
OK - so there is a lesser 'onus of proof'...I'm not making a statement but putting something out there for discussion.
ASADA can (seemingly) prove items existed but not that any specific person took what at any time. They need the players to incriminate themselves or each other...this hasn't changed all along... The bait just got more real to 'make it all end'...
ASADA can (seemingly) prove items existed but not that any specific person took what at any time. They need the players to incriminate themselves or each other...this hasn't changed all along... The bait just got more real to 'make it all end'...
sharkstragic
Jaws
That's how they got Armstrong. Someone blabbed
A.Snowden
Jaws
Well there would be a couple doing it already i suppose, with the 3-4 players suing the sharks over it. Cordoba, Gordon, And 1 or 2 more?
slide rule
Jaws
The more people that know something, the harder it is to keep it secret. There must be 20+ people that know about this (at least).
Gards
Jaws
Just show ASADA footage of Robson and the team from the game against the Storm last week - Case Closed Punishment Served
Well every in goal kick he makes goes into the 10th row...the Peptides are too effective...
Gards
Jaws
didn't know the drugs were selective and only kicked in when Robbo was within 20 metres of the tryline...
CrazyMatt
Jaws
dylan the villian
Jaws
8. Get 'tides or die tryin'
MAD... Mutually Assured Distruction
For many years, this is what kept the Cold War "Cold"
I suspect this new "chapter" of the story is very much about divide and conquer. Will players cop a very public and embarrassing whack to protect a Coach, support staff or their mates?
Along with the "Show Cause" notices there would be some accompanying form of signed affidavit indicating the strength of ASADA's case against them.
That has to be done on a case by case basis so the affidavit against one person will probably be different to another person.
I reckon today has brought about a new chapter... one where players might start to evaluate the situation in a broader yet selfishly-driven context. Will they start to question their allegiances and solidarity?
Will they be willing to cop the brunt of the grief and public humiliation in order to protect someone else who comes out looking like their sh|t don't stink?
Sorry... I don't think so.
For many years, this is what kept the Cold War "Cold"
I suspect this new "chapter" of the story is very much about divide and conquer. Will players cop a very public and embarrassing whack to protect a Coach, support staff or their mates?
Along with the "Show Cause" notices there would be some accompanying form of signed affidavit indicating the strength of ASADA's case against them.
That has to be done on a case by case basis so the affidavit against one person will probably be different to another person.
I reckon today has brought about a new chapter... one where players might start to evaluate the situation in a broader yet selfishly-driven context. Will they start to question their allegiances and solidarity?
Will they be willing to cop the brunt of the grief and public humiliation in order to protect someone else who comes out looking like their sh|t don't stink?
Sorry... I don't think so.
- Status