slide rule
Jaws
"Mate Land", not "Maitland". Tef is everybody's friend.
This is exactly the mentality I am talking about. You may be confusing criminal law with the ASADA investigation. What is the burden of proof they operate under? I would suggest it's not beyond reasonable doubt and leans more towards the balance of probabilities. And I don't think they had powerade in those syringes.
People write all sorts of things in newspapers. It wasn't handled well,blah blab. It means nothing. The only group to have tested flaws are Essendon. Unless we test it as a club their investigation was exemplary.I didn't realise that the flaws were specific to the Essendon case - seemingly it's no secret that the ASADA investigation wasn't greatly handled and I assumed that to be the case with us as well.
We have no idea who has what evidence. I don't anyway.Anyways - parallels with Lance are mentioned, and that the circumstantial evidence pertaining to substances being around him were enough to see him go down, and yet with us the same (alleged) evidence exists re the existence of curtain substances and yet there is no evidence to say who got what and when....the law tends to favour a not guilty outcome when the potential for someone innocent getting convicted exists...ASADA really needs our guys to provide this assistance to tie some loose ends - our legal advice surely would be to continue to say nothing and let them try and prove it?
I rest my case.
"Mate Land", not "Maitland". Tef is everybody's friend.
how good is his investigative skills. worked out you were from maito all on his own.....smart cookie haha
Dank is a scientist. Maybe he was running a double blind placebo test.The last bit is the problem.
Yes there were 2 substances in question
Players were given something
But not every player would be taking one or both substance. One may have had substance a the other substance b. asada need to determine who had what. Without an admission thats gunnabe hard to determine.
The Gillard Government may have been opportunistic in using a breaking story to gain some political mileage but to try to present that they were complicit in a conspiracy is as ludicrous a suggestion as Tony Abbott somehow being involved in the shooting down of MH17 so that he could gain some political cred on the international stage.
Politicians are like that - they seize media opportunity so they can spin political rhetoric. No political party or side of politics has a patent on that.
Dank is a scientist. Maybe he was running a double blind placebo test.
Best defence I've heard yet.
Dank is a scientist. Maybe he was running a double blind placebo test.
Great name for a band I reckon..
I prefer "Dank is a Scientist"And now taking the stage.......The Double Blind Placebo Test! Kinda works.
I prefer "Dank is a Scientist"
hang around maito after dark you gotta be kidding meHaha, I'm getting worried now Dylan. I'll just peek out the blinds and check the garden beds to make sure he's not watching me right now.
These maitland blokes just can't take a joke matehang around maito after dark you gotta be kidding me
And that was just a light hearted joke mate lol
Jeez can't a guy make a comment on here regardless of how stupid some of you think it is without being slammed by keyboard warriors
bunch of skirts the lot of themThese maitland blokes just can't take a joke mate
hang around maito after dark you gotta be kidding me
And that was just a light hearted joke mate lol
Jeez can't a guy make a comment on here regardless of how stupid some of you think it is without being slammed by keyboard warriors