Witch Hunt ?

slide rule

Jaws
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
20,480
Reaction score
464
Location
General Admission
It annoys me that the media choose to blame the Board for things that are out of their control, e.g. Greg Bird, Reni Maitua. These guys are individuals and as such should be held personally accountable for their actions. It's not the Boards fault. They are not babysitters for men in their mid 20's.

I'd much rather that they investigate the way in which the board has failed to promote the Sharks adequately and improve the match day experience for the average fan. I wonder how long it has been since a board member has bothered to stand on the hill? Even for 20 minutes or so.

These are the issues which need to be addressed. NOT dredging up minor crap from the past. Zapia accidently hitting someone in the head is not news worthy, unless it was deliberate. Accidents happen. I don’t understand how this is meant to demonstrate that the Sharks have a “rotten culture”. This is just the work of an attention seeking idiot trying to make a name for herself.
 

RisingUp

Hammerhead
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
328
Reaction score
3
This whole media thing is like a bushfire. You will not put it out until every rotten thing is exposed. But like a bushfire, there is always new life afterwards... if we have the funds to survive.

Re Reni, the board took him on even though he had a very bad rap sheet at the Bulldogs.

Zapia accidently hitting someone in the head is not news worthy, unless it was deliberate.

I think that's the point here. Do you categorically know that it was an accident? I don't, so I'll leave crucifying the journo until another day.

If there's anything wrong in these allegations, I expect to see Tony Zappia sue the SMH very soon.
 
Last edited:

BackRowMadness

Tiger Shark
Joined
Mar 18, 2009
Messages
1,360
Reaction score
2
You could tell she was lying last night on the footy show. Did anyone pick it up?? when Phil Gould was asking her questions about the article her face was turning red it was obvious she was moving around and looked extremely uncomfortable. I rekon she saw the 2 women in there and she probabley assumed they were prostitutes that's just low!!! seriously and i don't think anyone on the panel last night believed her story!
anyone agree with me?
I loved how Gould took her apart piece by piece. They both work for SMH and I reckon she thought she would be backed up by Gould. In the end he ambushed her and it was great to see these medie pricks get some of their own medicine.
 

slide rule

Jaws
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
20,480
Reaction score
464
Location
General Admission
I think that's the point here. Do you categorically know that it was an accident? I don't, so I'll leave crucifying the journo until another day.

If there's anything wrong in these allegations, I expect to see Tony Zappia sue the SMH very soon.

No I don’t know for sure, but it doesn’t sound like she does either.

She should not come out with these types of things unless she can prove it. What she is suggesting is a very serious allegation. If it is not true, Zappia does not deserve to have his name dragged through the mud and neither do the Cronulla Sharks.
 

sharky94

Bull Shark
Joined
Apr 10, 2009
Messages
1,693
Reaction score
9
Location
Penriff
I loved how Gould took her apart piece by piece. They both work for SMH and I reckon she thought she would be backed up by Gould. In the end he ambushed her and it was great to see these medie pricks get some of their own medicine.

Agree 100%
 

Great White Shark

Hammerhead
Joined
Jun 24, 2007
Messages
302
Reaction score
4
Magnay was on the footy show and I must say at least Gus got stuck into her. I wrote to Channel 9 today and asked she explai nor remove herself. See below, feel free to write to footyshownrl@nine.com.au


"
I refer to our conversation this morning. As mentioned, I am a sharks supporter but above all a NRL supporter.

I am not always in agreement with Phil Gould’s comments. However, last night he restored some respectability to a show that could have endorsed the worst PR week in the NRL’s history. When he asked Jacquelin Magnay whether her allegation were factual and whether she believes payments were made by the Cronulla club as a silencing/payoff incentive her only comment was that she alleged a payment was made, a photograph was produced and readers will reach their own conclusions. As an intelligent person Ms. Magnay would know that readers will immediately make obvious assumptions. It would be disingenuous to acknowledge anything else. This piece of journalism, which continues in the papers today, seems nothing more then sensational journalism. There is no evidence produced of an assault but insinuation of misconduct. I am surprised that the Footy Show, given the sensational nature of her reporting, invited her to panel the show. I always thought the Show endorsed rugby league. Yesterday, in having her on the panel, the Show endorsed the same innuendo and scare mongering the media perpetuates when a story is there to sensationalise (and sell papers). No doubt Phil Gould tried to restore some respectability in attacking her reporting but why was she even there?

I will only say this. If she is not a ‘sensational’ reporter and is a lover of rugby league she should come clean with the entire story (she mentions that 10% has only been exposed) and if her insinuations are not true, she should publicly step down from the Footy Show (by next week) and return some respectability to sports journalists.

Regards

Nicholas Weininger

Ps and if Ms Magnay repeats her assertion that all she did was report facts, she should stop insulting her readers’ intelligence. All journalism pieces include some opinion (by way of use of jargon, phrases, emotive words etc). Her piece, in the absence of FACTS, was sensationalised journalism at its worst. She should not, on the same evening, turn up on a Show that includes true lovers of the game and include herself as one of those. Her subjective piece caused a lot of damage to the NRL. She should accept this. "
 

RisingUp

Hammerhead
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
328
Reaction score
3
I tell you what, any soft spot I had for the Bears returning is well and truly gone after the way they have been dancing on our grave - and we're not even dead. They've obviously learned nothing from their years in exile but already there's a bad stench about them. I hope they are overlooked for readmission. They seem to think they are a certainty.
 

slide rule

Jaws
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
20,480
Reaction score
464
Location
General Admission
I tell you what, any soft spot I had for the Bears returning is well and truly gone after the way they have been dancing on our grave - and we're not even dead. They've obviously learned nothing from their years in exile but already there's a bad stench about them. I hope they are overlooked for readmission. They seem to think they are a certainty.

Me too. They have rubbed me the wrong way.

I dont think the CC will be successful anyway.

They only have the same population as the shire, but they are poorer.
 

SHARKSTER

Jaws
Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
5,610
Reaction score
47
I tell you what, any soft spot I had for the Bears returning is well and truly gone after the way they have been dancing on our grave - and we're not even dead. They've obviously learned nothing from their years in exile but already there's a bad stench about them. I hope they are overlooked for readmission. They seem to think they are a certainty.

Agreed. I have supported the Bears readmission, but now they can go die for all I care. There are politically correct ways to convey they would step up if the Sharks could not compete in the NRL and there are also inappropriate, slap in the face, ways to try and use a situation to your advantage at the expense of another.

Sadly, Florimo has chosen the later and for that I hope the Bears never be seen of again.:rant
 

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,097
It's no secret that many in the media want us out and replaced with a central coast team.
Journalists are paid to do their job, which is to sell newspapers and attract TV audiences.

I don't believe that most journalists (excluding ex footballers now in the media) care one way or the other, but the people paying their salaries have a lot to gain from any turmoil in the NRL (or anywhere for that matter).
 

BackRowMadness

Tiger Shark
Joined
Mar 18, 2009
Messages
1,360
Reaction score
2
Me too. They have rubbed me the wrong way.

I dont think the CC will be successful anyway.

They only have the same population as the shire, but they are poorer.

Look at the Mariners. They get decent crowds but still struggle financially.
 

ROB SHARK

Great White
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
2,633
Reaction score
6
Location
Shire
I loved how Gould took her apart piece by piece. They both work for SMH and I reckon she thought she would be backed up by Gould. In the end he ambushed her and it was great to see these medie pricks get some of their own medicine.

agreed.
 

moruya shark

Grey Nurse
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
569
Reaction score
6
In relation to all the media quotes: I deal with media on a daily basis and let me tell you none of them are trustworthy. Least of all the ABC or the Herald,they play the dirtiest of all.. but they are all vultures that prey on human misery and the greater the misery the more vultures you get all circling for their piece of meat.... they are the lowest form of life !!!!
 

Google News

Newsbot
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
79,522
Reaction score
34
Loss of innocence

Loss of innocenceMelbourne Herald Sun, AustraliaThe National Rugby League will no doubt ensure the club sees the season out. But the fan base in the vast Cronulla Shire should be on notice to start looking for a new club to follow. Sarah is in for more disappointment. Not only will she find out soon ...

Source: http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/sport/nrl/story/0,26799,25523151-5016307,00.html

Loss of innocence
By Rebecca Wilson
May 23, 2009 12:00am

SARAH is 10 years old. She was given a Cronulla Sharks jersey as a newborn.

The moment she could talk, she wanted to play for the Sharks. Her parents told her gently that the chances of that happening were remote. Cheerleading could be a possibility, they said.

Bugger that was her answer.

The Sharks could do with a Sarah this week. Cronulla has always been great at including women and girls. They have a stand at their home ground dedicated to families, where no alcohol can be consumed and parents are encouraged to bring their kids to the footy.

The Sharks junior competition is the envy of Sydney - people actually move to the Shire to put their kids into the local league.

Although, the rot has set in. Reni Maitua's downfall this week follows a dismal period for the Sharks, during which major sponsors and fans have run like the devil from the badness enveloping the club.

Sarah will be shattered at the end of this season when she is told her team is pretty much dead in the water. She and thousands of others who love their footy club are in for a rude awakening when they realise this crisis won't just be a passing thing.

The Sharks have made sure their state of affairs is defining. On current predictions, it will also be brutally final.

The Cronulla Sharks were a fairytale waiting to happen. They entered the competition in 1967 but their potential never equalled achievement and they are yet to win their first Grand Final 42 years later.

They have had great players and coaches, but the Sharks have never cut the mustard when it mattered. Their old coach, Jack Gibson, said that waiting for the Sharks to win a Grand Final was like leaving the porch light on for Harold Holt. Sharks fans are resilient, though, and have always put up with a raft of excuses, bad management, ordinary players, indiscretions and appalling decision-making.

This week, however, the whole lot has fallen in a screaming heap and there is very little hope left for a club that should really encapsulate all that is good about rugby league.

The Matthew Johns saga did not help. We are still waiting for his old Sharks buddies to come forward to wear some of the badness that befell him last week.

The list goes on - Greg Bird glassing his girlfriend, former Bulldog Reni Maitua (who they should never have signed in the first place) and the cloud hanging over a chief executive who can inflict a black eye on a female employee. It reads like a cheap Sicilian crime story.

Sharks chairman Barry Pierce has issued a statement through his lawyers that he won't make a comment. Even though he is mostly to blame for the mess, he won't speak now the going is tough. Pierce is seen as an endearing grandfather, a bloke who is as honest as the day is long who would never do wrong. How, then, did he read those police reports from the Matthew Johns incident and not feel moved to act?

How could he have overseen the hiring of league bad boy Reni Maitua? Why did he stand by while his beloved club went belly up? His lack of accountability has been shameful.

Reni Maitua is obviously a bad egg. He was one of those kids from school who was always the naughty one. Embattled Sharks coach Ricky Stuart signed him as a star player upon whom he would rely to build a club.

It is apparent from that decision, and the one to release Brett Kimmorley to the Bulldogs, that the Sharks have lost the plot. Stuart has made some unusually rash judgments that have cost the Sharks more than just a couple of games of football. Anyone who can read a newspaper knows Maitua was no team builder.

The amateurs among us knew the Sharks' season would end in tears even before we were halfway to September.

The National Rugby League will no doubt ensure the club sees the season out. But the fan base in the vast Cronulla Shire should be on notice to start looking for a new club to follow.

Sarah is in for more disappointment. Not only will she find out soon that women don't play first-grade rugby league. Her father will have to tell her why Maitua is out of the team for good.

She will grow up knowing that the blue, black and whites of her short childhood disappeared too early. She and her dad won't have a date every second week at Shark Park and their lives will be all the poorer for the loss of something that is really, really important to the fabric of her world and other innocents like her.

http://rwilson@dmgradio.com.au

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

2psk5ll.jpg


:lmao
 
Last edited by a moderator:

sharkafar

Bull Shark
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
129
Location
On the lam
Journalists are paid to do their job, which is to sell newspapers and attract TV audiences.

I don't believe that most journalists (excluding ex footballers now in the media) care one way or the other, but the people paying their salaries have a lot to gain from any turmoil in the NRL (or anywhere for that matter).

So true. The problem is that the internet and multimedia news channels, blogs etc. are slowly killing off newspapers. So the print media have to continually try to find some 'scoop' to keep people buying the product. This is a news story. It's got people talking. And people love to hear and read about scandal. It sells. If you think the papers are bad over there, you should try reading some here. (England) Anyone with any experience of the UK media knows how vicious and unrelenting they can be. Unfortunately league has been taking hits for a while and we're a convenient source of scandal for now. I don't really think there's any hidden agenda to it.
As I said in a previous post, the barely disguised glee they seem to be taking in writing about all this stuff is probably just down to - we've got a story, let's run with it and squeeze every last drop of scandal, voyuerism and pompous moralising out of it till it's bled dry. The death of the club would just be an unfortunate or indifferent side-effect to them. It's about selling papers.
I agree with others here. The board need to go. Now. Stop hiding behind the constitution and get some new blood in. We need to be totally up front and honest with the NRL, the banks and -shudder- the media. It's going to be very hard and not pretty but unless we change tack sharpish and start steering a new course we will be (no pun intended) dead in the water. :mad:
 

RisingUp

Hammerhead
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
328
Reaction score
3
Bec & Buzz
PHIL ROTHFIELD, REBECCA WILSON
24 May 2009
Sunday Telegraph

Off-the-mark coverage is another sad commentary

THE standard of reporting in the Fairfax media on the Matthew Johns/Sharks sex scandal has been a disgrace.

On Friday, The Sydney Morning Herald was forced to run a front-page `exclusive' retraction to a story by Jacquelin Magnay about allegations the Sharks offered sex toys to players and partners.

The original story was riddled with inaccuracies.

Last Monday night, Media Watch exposed Danny Weidler for what he is -- a hack who is obviously careless about getting the facts right.

Last Sunday, Weidler wrote: ``It's my understanding the head policeman who featured in the show is far from impressed with the angle and facts that Four Corners chose to present.''

This was nonsense. As Media Watch confirmed, Weidler never even spoke to New Zealand Police. In fact, the policeman said: ``I was away last week in hospital having surgery. The only reporter I have ever spoken to was Four Corners' Sarah Ferguson and she was really good.''

Bec & Buzz
PHIL ROTHFIELD, REBECCA WILSON
24 May 2009
Sunday Telegraph

Shhhhh

WE keep hearing the Parramatta Eels are having second thoughts about Tony Zappia as chief executive to replace Denis Fitzgerald because his reputation has copped a battering at the Sharks.

We're hearing a lot of the negative publicity about Zappia in the Fairfax press is being generated by some disgruntled old figures at Parramatta who don't want him joining the Eels.
 
Last edited:

BackRowMadness

Tiger Shark
Joined
Mar 18, 2009
Messages
1,360
Reaction score
2
SMH retracts zappia ex toys story

In the tele today it said that the smh had a front page retraction of the zappia and sex toys story. did anyone see this ? i can't find another reference to it anywhere and i thought it would be HUGE news. Any ideas?
 

sharktastic

Hammerhead
Joined
Apr 23, 2008
Messages
338
Reaction score
1
Is there nothing that the sharks can do about this??? Can we not get some kind of compensation.. We need the money
 
Top