Witch Hunt ?

slide rule

Jaws
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
20,480
Reaction score
464
Location
General Admission
The harsh reality is that "The Media" giveth... and the "The Media" taketh away.

Without "The Media" there is no sponsors, no NRL, no players... unless we go amateur of course (which sometimes I think wouldn't be a bad thing).

The Sharks, need to now work out a way to turn a negative into a positive.

I just think we're so busy putting out spot fires that we're not tackling the main blaze.

The worst thing is, we don’t even have anyone to do that! We don’t have a CEO and the board is more or less in "caretaker" mode. Our upper level of management is running on a skeleton staff.

I read somewhere that Barry Pierce is the acting CEO until the board appoints someone else. We'll that’s less than ideal, considering that he has basically been forced to resign from the board! I'm sure he's doing his best, but it's questionable how much real authority he has to make decisions at the moment. He may technically have authority, but he can’t really make long term decisions on behalf of the club at this time.

So effectively, there is no-one at the steering wheel of the club in its darkest hour.. Decisive action needs to be taken, but there is no-one with the authority to do anything.

It's very worrying...
 

fitz

-------------
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
8,229
Reaction score
163
Location
Shire
Slider,

You seem to understand the structure of the organisation but I think that a lot of people on this forum don't quite understand the reality of the administrative structure of the Club and what has been going on with that lately.

So to clarify things in simple terms:
The Members of the Football Club vote for who they think should have on The Board.
Of that elected Board a President is established. It is the President's role to be the ultimate authority for the direction and business reporting of the Club
It is the Board's responsibilty to then appoint a CEO.
It is the CEO's responsibilty to run the day-to-day affairs of the Football Club and to do what is required of them as stipulated by the Board.

Now, from recent evidence there has been a complete breakdown in that basic structure - hence the members voting out former Members of the Board and replacing them with new Board members.

Important things people need to understand... Barry Pierce is only temporarily acting in the role of both President and CEO. He has tendered his resignation which is from 30th June.

There is no guarantee at this stage that the EGM is going to go ahead at all - it is up to the Football Club members to initiate that - not the Board. More info is available at this thread ( http://www.sharksforever.com/forums/showthread.php?p=170453#post170453 )

I can't see any CEO agreeing to take on the job of running the day-to-day affairs of the Club knowing that there just as likely to be kicked out by whatever new Board is elected. So we're in a real Catch 22 situation.

If people want to have a say in what goes on in the Club and where the Club is going, they really need to become a Member of the Football Club, go to General Meetings and be active in voting. That is the only way things will effectively change.

Whingeing and carrying on like victims about the Media's treatment isn't going to help one little bit.

Rather than being the now scapegoats and whipping boys of the community, the Sharks need to aggresively re-establish themselves as a shining light in the community.

The Club needs strong capable and courageous leadership. It's up to us members to put the right people there to do that job.
 

Magnay Hater

Mullet
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
Miranda
Why does Magnay hate the Sharks???

Why does Jacquelin Magnay hate the Sharks?

Sending out below email to as many Sharks and Rugby League fans I know to ask the same question.. Does anyone have the answers???

Fellow Shark & League Supporters,

Story in today SMH.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/lhqnews/...9/06/15/1244917986101.html?sssdmh=dm16.382188


Story doesn’t start with the line…

”The payments for Digger are up to date, with the club having paid $9750 of the $26,000”.

What is her issue????

Whole story over $4600… and the key witness Jenny Hall… She has no more creditability as a serious journalist… She must be hard up for a story to continue to churn out a story a week from the same Jenny Hall, a disgruntled former employee of the Sharks…

Has she once written a positive story about Rugby League, let alone the Cronulla Sharks…

Gavin Miller must have knocked her back at the Vinyl room and she has it in for the Sharks.

Below is Jacquelin’s email address, I doubt she we acknowledge them, but lets all tell her what we think about her stories about the Sharks.

JMAGNAY@smh.com.au

Would love to set up a website to find out if anyone has any dirt on this Walkley award winning journalist who likes to tackle the BIG issues in sport… spare me…. She has devoted most of the year writing negative story about the Sharks, with most of the leads from Jenny Hall… Wonder what she will write about when those leads dry up…

Regards
Magnay Hater
 
Last edited:

BackRowMadness

Tiger Shark
Joined
Mar 18, 2009
Messages
1,360
Reaction score
2
Why does Jacquelin Magnay hate the Sharks?

Sending out below email to as many Sharks and Rugby League fans I know to ask the same question.. Does anyone have the answers???

Fellow Shark & League Supporters,

Story in today SMH.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/lhqnews/...9/06/15/1244917986101.html?sssdmh=dm16.382188


Story doesn’t start with the line…

”The payments for Digger are up to date, with the club having paid $9750 of the $26,000”.

What is her issue????

Whole story over $4600… and the key witness Jenny Hall… She has no more creditability as a serious journalist… She must be hard up for a story to continue to churn out a story a week from the same Jenny Hall, a disgruntled former employee of the Sharks…

Has she once written a positive story about Rugby League, let alone the Cronulla Sharks…

Gavin Miller must have knocked her back at the Vinyl room and she has it in for the Sharks.

Below is Jacquelin’s email address, I doubt she we acknowledge them, but lets all tell her what we think about her stories about the Sharks.

JMAGNAY@smh.com.au

Would love to set up a website to find out if anyone has any dirt on this Walkley award winning journalist who likes to tackle the BIG issues in sport… spare me…. She has devoted most of the year writing negative story about the Sharks, with most of the leads from Jenny Hall… Wonder what she will write about when those leads dry up…

Regards
Magnay Hater

We all hate her mate but if you ackonwledge her then that is exactly what she wants. The best idea os for everyone to ignore her and she will disappear into the ether from which she came. She has hers coming mate don't worry.
 

sharkafar

Bull Shark
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
129
Location
On the lam
Slider,

You seem to understand the structure of the organisation but I think that a lot of people on this forum don't quite understand the reality of the administrative structure of the Club and what has been going on with that lately.

So to clarify things in simple terms:
The Members of the Football Club vote for who they think should have on The Board.
Of that elected Board a President is established. It is the President's role to be the ultimate authority for the direction and business reporting of the Club
It is the Board's responsibilty to then appoint a CEO.
It is the CEO's responsibilty to run the day-to-day affairs of the Football Club and to do what is required of them as stipulated by the Board.

Now, from recent evidence there has been a complete breakdown in that basic structure - hence the members voting out former Members of the Board and replacing them with new Board members.

Important things people need to understand... Barry Pierce is only temporarily acting in the role of both President and CEO. He has tendered his resignation which is from 30th June.

There is no guarantee at this stage that the EGM is going to go ahead at all - it is up to the Football Club members to initiate that - not the Board. More info is available at this thread ( http://www.sharksforever.com/forums/showthread.php?p=170453#post170453 )

I can't see any CEO agreeing to take on the job of running the day-to-day affairs of the Club knowing that there just as likely to be kicked out by whatever new Board is elected. So we're in a real Catch 22 situation.

If people want to have a say in what goes on in the Club and where the Club is going, they really need to become a Member of the Football Club, go to General Meetings and be active in voting. That is the only way things will effectively change.

Whingeing and carrying on like victims about the Media's treatment isn't going to help one little bit.

Rather than being the now scapegoats and whipping boys of the community, the Sharks need to aggresively re-establish themselves as a shining light in the community.

The Club needs strong capable and courageous leadership. It's up to us members to put the right people there to do that job.

Well put and you're absolutely right Fitz. It would bode us well not to lose sight of the big picture and that is to support the club in the best way we can. As you say, gripes about the media will get us nowhere.
Doesn't mean I have to like them though. Grrrrrr. :mad:
 

Google News

Newsbot
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
79,522
Reaction score
34
Well done, Socceroos - and everybody else, let's cut the carping

Well done, Socceroos - and everybody else, let's cut the carpingBrisbane Times, AustraliaThe NRL must act to kill off the Sharks. The shemozzle they have created ( SMH , June 17) will turn into a black hole of negative press that will demean a wonderful game. The onfield performances this year have been overshadowed by the Sharks' slow ...

Source: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/sport/well-done-socceroos--and-everybody-else-lets-cut-the-carping-20090620-cret.html

Well done, Socceroos - and everybody else, let's cut the carping
June 20, 2009 - 12:28AM

<EDITED>

The NRL must act to kill off the Sharks. The shemozzle they have created ( SMH , June 17) will turn into a black hole of negative press that will demean a wonderful game. The onfield performances this year have been overshadowed by the Sharks' slow demise. The quicker they are gone the better for the game, its supporters and the public. The Sharks have never been a successful team other than in their early days, when two English bovver boys gave them some teeth.

Once they are put out of their misery at the end of this season then at least their supporters will have a team to support in the mighty Dragons - unlike the situation the Bears' supporters found themselves in.

They were knifed when the Bears were prevented from moving to the Central Coast over a decade ago after gaining the approval of the ARL.

Bring back the Bears for the 2010 season to represent Sydney north - from Milsons Point to The Entrance, the forgotten area of league.

Doug Wood, North Sydney

It appears the Herald is on a mission to rid society of the evil Sharkies Club. Having received more bad press than the Moran family, it is obvious the club has been poorly managed. However, I believe that to neglect all the positive aspects it generates in the community shows a lack of balance. No doubt other football clubs have skeletons in the closet.

I suspect the Herald will be queuing up to put the slipper in when the Sharks club submits its development application. Your newspaper seems to be at the vanguard of the phenomena of Shire bashing.

Richard Carroll, Peakhurst

<EDITED>
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ROB SHARK

Great White
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
2,633
Reaction score
6
Location
Shire
Well done, Socceroos - and everybody else, let's cut the carpingBrisbane Times, AustraliaThe NRL must act to kill off the Sharks. The shemozzle they have created ( SMH , June 17) will turn into a black hole of negative press that will demean a wonderful game. The onfield performances this year have been overshadowed by the Sharks' slow ...

Source: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/sport/well-done-socceroos--and-everybody-else-lets-cut-the-carping-20090620-cret.html

Well done, Socceroos - and everybody else, let's cut the carping
June 20, 2009 - 12:28AM

<EDITED>

The NRL must act to kill off the Sharks. The shemozzle they have created ( SMH , June 17) will turn into a black hole of negative press that will demean a wonderful game. The onfield performances this year have been overshadowed by the Sharks' slow demise. The quicker they are gone the better for the game, its supporters and the public. The Sharks have never been a successful team other than in their early days, when two English bovver boys gave them some teeth.

Once they are put out of their misery at the end of this season then at least their supporters will have a team to support in the mighty Dragons - unlike the situation the Bears' supporters found themselves in.

They were knifed when the Bears were prevented from moving to the Central Coast over a decade ago after gaining the approval of the ARL.

Bring back the Bears for the 2010 season to represent Sydney north - from Milsons Point to The Entrance, the forgotten area of league.
Doug Wood, North Sydney

Typical north sydney fan talking, just cause you dont have a team doesnt mean you rid death on our team.

It appears the Herald is on a mission to rid society of the evil Sharkies Club. Having received more bad press than the Moran family, it is obvious the club has been poorly managed. However, I believe that to neglect all the positive aspects it generates in the community shows a lack of balance. No doubt other football clubs have skeletons in the closet.

I suspect the Herald will be queuing up to put the slipper in when the Sharks club submits its development application. Your newspaper seems to be at the vanguard of the phenomena of Shire bashing.

Richard Carroll, Peakhurst

<EDITED>

At least he supports us, i wonder who he is talking about when he says the herald is on a mission to get rid of the sharks cough magnay cough.
 

Google News

Newsbot
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
79,522
Reaction score
34
League HQThe porn king and his links to teamsLeague HQ... took the Cronulla Sutherland Sharks to a North Sydney restaurant for a slap-up pre-season meal and pays over the odds at Manly Sea Eagles so that he can ...and more »

Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=R&sa=T&url=http://www.leaguehq.com.au/news/lhqnews/the-porn-king-and-his-links-to-teams/2009/07/04/1246127729929.html&usg=AFQjCNESA2fwygLjhgIbWt_rPnvIIkVgnA

The porn king and his links to teams

Dylan Welch
July 5, 2009

7162qq.jpg

Con Ange ... X-rated videos. Photo: Anthony Johnson


CONTROVERSIAL links to the sporting and political world, allegations of selling pirated and illegal hard-core films, as well as appearances in sex tapes and a Filipina porn star girlfriend - welcome to the world of Con Ange.

Now hailed as one of Australia's porn kings, Mr Ange is a controversial figure in the already colourful pornography industry.

He also haunts the periphery of the scandal rocking rugby league, with revelations in May of his relationship with disgraced Cronulla boss Tony Zappia and accusations that Ange provided "adult material" to players.

Today The Sun-Herald can reveal Mr Ange is also involved with another of the men involved in the scandal, Vince Lombardo. Mr Lombardo is the property developer friend of embattled Parramatta chairman, Roy Spagnolo.

Mr Ange and Mr Lombardo co-own St Paul's Tavern in downtown Brisbane, which they developed and reopened together in 2002.

Mr Ange, 49, also recently created a weight-loss company with former State Liberals leader Kerry Chikarovski.

Mr Ange was contacted by The Sun-Herald yesterday about this story but declined to answer anything over the phone. He asked that the newspaper instead email questions to him. He did not respond to the email and he did not answer his phone for the rest of the day.

Well-known in the adult industry, the wig-wearing entrepreneur had his beginnings when he opened an adult book store in Sydney two decades ago. Through a series of canny business manoeuvres Mr Ange turned that modest business enterprise into one of Australia's biggest adult store chains.

A senior adult industry source who has known Mr Ange since he appeared on the scene in the 1980s, said Mr Ange represented the "bad" end of the adult industry.

Mr Ange is one of the "top three" adult businessmen in Australia, after the owners of Club X and Sexytime, and has interests in as many as 50 separate adult stores, the source said.

Then there is Mr Ange's business involvement with Ms Chikarovski, which was formalised in February when the pair created a company named Pharmaslim.

Ms Chikarovski, who runs a political lobbying firm, is the sole director and holds a 30 per cent stake in the company. Mr Ange holds the remaining 70 per cent stake.

Speaking from London, Ms Chikarovski said the company was not yet operational. "It's just a proposal at the moment."

The Sun-Herald does not suggest she has any association with any other aspect of Mr Ange's business interests.

Mr Ange's primary business, Everything Adult, is in the top four adult store chains in Australia and has 23 stores across the three eastern states. He has interests in many of the stores either through the freehold or full or part ownership of the business.

His involvement in Everything Adult has also caused him numerous legal headaches. Mr Ange and business partners have been repeatedly fined in Queensland and NSW for selling X-rated videos as well as hard-core films that had already been refused classification.

The most recent fine was in Queensland last September, when he and business partner Costa George were fined $5000 each.

Another area of Mr Ange's life that has attracted controversy is his relationship with the National Rugby League.

Mr Ange has infiltrated the game to such an extent that he travelled with Parramatta players on an overseas tour several years ago, took the Cronulla Sutherland Sharks to a North Sydney restaurant for a slap-up pre-season meal and pays over the odds at Manly Sea Eagles so that he can gain ready access to the dressing rooms.

It is well known among the players that Mr Ange is happy to provide free "product", although when he turned up to the North Sydney restaurant earlier this year with two boxes of condoms, lubricant and adult films the players were nonplussed by at least one genre of movie: several gay porn films were left in the restaurant when the group left.

Mr Ange was well known to the Sharks through his association with Mr Zappia and he was allowed free access into the dressing rooms, sometimes with "friends". But Mr Ange was originally a Manly Sea Eagles fan. He still pays $70,000 a year to the club for season tickets in a corporate box. The largesse allows him a status within the club on par with a major sponsor.

Mr Ange is the co-owner of US adult film production company Wildlife Digital, most famous for its Screw My Wife, Please series of films. According to adult film websites, the company has released about 150 adult films.

Mr Ange, under the stage name "Con Aussie", has also produced dozens of his company's movies. What is less known is that he also features in many of his movies as an extra, although not in any sex scenes.

In one movie, Manila Exposed 1, Mr Ange and his then friend, Connie, are filmed walking in Manila. They hold hands and buy ice-creams. In the next scene Connie and another young Filipina kiss, and proceed to have explicit sex with two men.

A former employee of one of Mr Ange's Sydney adult stores alleged some of the DVDs and video cassettes in the store were pirated.

Mr Ange owns a shopfront only a few roads from his family's $2 million mansion, "St Malo", in North Sydney.

The warehouse was recently moved a few doors up the street. Both the former staffer and a former business partner recall going into the old warehouse and seeing commercial-grade colour printers that were being used to print out facsimiles of movie covers.

The former clerk said several years ago he had seen a bank of DVD and video-cassette machines at the warehouse Mr Ange allegedly used to copy movies he bought overseas.
 

Attachments

  • con_ange_wideweb__470x313,0.jpg
    con_ange_wideweb__470x313,0.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 0

Google News

Newsbot
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
79,522
Reaction score
34
Shadows in the dressing rooms

Shadows in the dressing roomsBrisbane TimesIn the past month the Herald has reported how the pornography king Con Ange is allowed into the Cronulla Sharks dressing room, freely able to gain access ...

Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=R&sa=T&url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/sport/league/shadows-in-the-dressing-rooms-20090711-dg7z.html&usg=AFQjCNF_4Qr7vlh-9bds3bAEzbJiQfPmMA

Shadows in the dressing rooms
July 11, 2009 - 12:32AM

They rub shoulders, do favours, share the bonhomie, but their roles and expectations are difficult to define. Jacquelin Magnay and Kate McClymont report on the new breed of powerful sporting friends.

The floors are concrete hard, splattered with mud and littered with sticky sports tape. The air is thick: humidity from steaming showers tinged with fresh sweat. Sports bags are collapsed open, shirts and ties spilling out at random. Behind the benches on the wall are coathangers of suits, some rumpled, others pressed within an inch of their lives. This is the unglamorous inner sanctum of the rugby league dressing room: yet it is a place so coveted, so precious.

An international report last week, focusing on money laundering and sport, noted: "Popular sport can be a route for criminals to become celebrities by associating with famous people and moving upwards to powerful circles within established society."

What better place to establish connections than the dressing room?

The winner's room is noisier, looser, abundant with bonhomie; the loser's can be a sombre, dark place. Win or lose, however, the rooms are crowded with men. The players are slumped in name-plated spots, showering, dressing, munching on fruit from platters in the middle of the room. Body parts are packed in ice and wrapped in plastic.

But the players are outnumbered. There are the coach and support staff - trainer, conditioner, assistant coach, stats man, doctor, physio, chairman and board members, media manager directing television crews and organising press interviews.

Of late, this scene of apparent mayhem has been infiltrated by powerful friends - behind-the-scenes supporters who clandestinely provide the players with product, money, "opportunities". These men are not official sponsors, yet they have the means and connections to get past security officials guarding the dressing rooms.

Once inside, no one questions their presence.

It is no mystery. These supporters find dressing rooms appealing not for their seclusion but for their rarified status. Being the powerful men pulling strings behind the scenes is a potent ego-booster. It showers a veneer of respectability and opens access to influential networks of people.

In the past month the Herald has reported how the pornography king Con Ange is allowed into the Cronulla Sharks dressing room, freely able to gain access and bring in a couple of female friends. Ange's son had the privilege of being an occasional ball boy for the Sharks. Ange took the club to a pre-season meal at a North Sydney restaurant. Yet officially Ange and the club were furious when the Herald wrote of him as a supporter. Sharks board members were perplexed: they had never met this man who produced and starred - albeit fully clothed and licking ice-cream - in his own porn movie. Club directors claim they didn't know of Ange. He was simply the mate of the then chief executive, Tony Zappia.

What then made him so influential that he could wander, at will, into the rooms, talking to players on a first-name basis?

Over at Parramatta, another club of Ange's acquaintance when Zappia was the Eels football manager, a different group of men wandered the dressing room labyrinth. The players knew them as the Italian connection and they offered players the inside running on property plays. One of them, the recently elected Parramatta chairman, Roy Spagnolo, would backslap players win, lose or draw. His property mates Vince Lombardo - nicknamed Desi by the players because of his resemblance to Desi Arnez - George Gaitanos and, later, Ange were dressing-room regulars. Ange went with the players on an off-season overseas tour.

Spagnolo would have players over to his Koala Way, Horsley Park, property for lunch, and organise visits to the Griffith winery he part-owns. Only Spagnolo was an official sponsor - through his property development company Brenex - and managed three Eels players. Their presence and familiarity with the club core was never questioned.

Martin Tolar, chief executive of the Australasian Compliance Institute, says he is unsurprised at the recent scrutiny of football clubs. Clubs must brace for further inspection, he says, not by media but by government regulators. "We have seen that at both Cronulla and Parramatta," says Tolar. "The tail has been wagging the dog and there are issues of corporate governance. These clubs need skilled directors who are experts in areas of law and business, rather than ex-footballers. There is a great concern that the governance of these types of clubs has not kept up with the size of their organisation."

Tolar says the Australian Transaction and Reporting and Anaylsis Centre - which monitors money laundering - is turning its focus from financial institutions to not-for-profit clubs, pubs, bookies and real estate agents.

"Any organisation that now deals in large amounts of cash will have to be prepared to put in place a whole raft of new policies. We have seen in the past week about threats involving a former chief executive and a director, potential salary cap breaches, the ATO looking at phoenix companies and a story about a former chief executive using a company owned by his wife that appears to be a conflict of interest. All of these things are basic governance issues. It worries me that if the basic issues are not being handled appropriately then what will happen when the attention turns to the big international issues?"

SEPARATELY last week the international Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering - established by the G7 20 years ago - released its Money Laundering Through The Football Sector report, noting the big money flowing into sport brings higher risk of fraud and corruption. "Sport can also be used as a channel to launder dirty money," says the report.

Most sports, including the rugby codes, soccer, cricket, horse racing and car racing are all vulnerable, says the report. And criminal activity is not confined to sport's top end. "There are connections between criminal organisations [including international organised crime] and the world of football. Social prestige is an important factor. Popular sport can be a route for criminals to become celebrities by associating with famous people and moving upwards to powerful circles within established society."

A regular at the Parramatta rooms was Brendan Gaffney, a Westpac "relationship manager" whose duties involved new lending and managing a large portfolio of business clients. Now serving five years for embezzling $3.9 million from the bank, Gaffney's trial heard he used some of the money to bet on behalf of unnamed high-profile people in the hope of improving his client-base and career.

The Australian reported Gaffney was introduced to the Eels by Mario Libertini, a close Spagnolo associate and now an Eels director. Libertini told the newspaper Gaffney worked at the branch where Libertini banked and ate at Libertini's restaurant.

"I can't confirm whether he was hanging around Parramatta or not," Libertini said.

The Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering says sports management is still often done by volunteers who are inexperienced and under-skilled. Fearing the impact of a bad image, including potential loss of sponsors, sports administrators often under-report their circumstances.

Criminals often look to sport for the opportunity of a reputation separate from crime. Football can offer a patron status because, too often, little attention is paid to the source of largesse. Rubbing shoulders with celebrity athletes can reward wealthy individuals beyond material gain.

Laundered money is used to buy celebrity and influence. "The criminal is buying an entrance ticket to a social milieu," the report states. And a social milieu where business mixes with players can also provide invaluable information.

Betting on rugby league has grown exponentially. Punters wager on who will be the first try-scorer, which team will lead at half-time, who'll be man of the match or judged the season's best. Information from players about an early possible return from injury, for example, or a throwaway line about the team's mood, can inform a bet. The invisible men who hang about absorbing snippets are the most sought after for insider information.

At the international Play The Game conference last month, the Australian Anti Doping Authority's chief executive and a former tennis official, Richard Ings, spoke about preventing match fixing. "Be brave," he said. "It is nasty out there." Professional gamblers, says Ings, must be identified and excluded from player areas and locker rooms. Tennis has had a number of suspect matches.

Matthew and Andrew Johns raised eyebrows with their friendship with Eddie Hayson, the controversial punter and owner of the Sydney brothel Stiletto. While still playing for the Newcastle Knights, Andrew Johns co-owned several racehorses with Hayson, a former bankrupt and a regular figure at racing inquiries.

One horse, Regreagan, was named after Matthew's character on Channel Nine's The Footy Show .

Questions were raised when a huge betting plunge backed the Knights to lose. Only after the bets were placed was it revealed that Andrew Johns was injured and would not play.

Hayson denied inside information. He said his was a small wager - "a couple of thousand" - and that he got his information from newspaper reports that Johns had injured his neck. An NRL investigation found nothing amiss.

The former American mob boss Michael Franzese - now known as "the Born Again Don" - painted a frightening picture of organised crime's involvement in match-fixing.

Franzese told of targeting sporting figures, encouraging them to build up gambling debts and then forcing them to fix a game when they couldn't pay.

"Finally, you say, 'OK, this is exactly how we are going to work this out. Tomorrow night you are favourites to win by 10 points. You make sure you win by six. I don't care how you do it - do whatever you have to do. If you do this a couple of times, we're even. If you don't do this a couple of times then don't worry - you don't have to call me any more. I'll find you.'"
 

Google News

Newsbot
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
79,522
Reaction score
34
Celebrities inhabiting Old Masters paintingsNEWS.com.auIf you look at the Franz Hals version of the Cronulla Sharks banqueting, it's not exactly clear what the message is, I don't think, at first. ...

Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=R&sa=T&url=http://blogs.news.com.au/news/splat/index.php/news/comments/celebrities_inhabiting_old_masters_paintings/58199&usg=AFQjCNHoRqFkUbkqDpckiGjPIDkrxskRKA

Celebrities inhabiting Old Masters paintings

Evan Maloney
July 26, 2009 at 12:06am

The UK’s Daily Mail generally offers slim pickings for splat topics but this recent article was just up our alley of diverting amusement. It shows celebrities reimagined as the subjects of famous paintings.

I particularly like the one of Snoop Dog dressed up like Napoleon, with his hand resting on his sternum in the requisite manner.

The examples published seem to be almost exclusively belonging to the French Neo-Classical period, with Jacques Louis David and Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres well represented. Ingres, whose reputation with paint was partially overlooked and his person ridiculed by posterity because of his determination while alive to paint only wealthy patrons, has a name which, somewhat ironically, sounds a bit like a Corsican saying “angry” in English, “I am Aungrrr.”

Anyway, if anyone has a particular painting in mind, why not link to it and tell us which celebrity you’d like to see reimagined as the famous sitter or subject. If you need some ideas, here’s a link to the National Gallery in London.

First up I’m going to choose a work by the only female artist to paint her way into late Renaissance celebrity, Artemisia Gentileschi. The painting is called, Susannah and the Elders.

The Old Testament story goes something like this: Susannah is taking an evening bathe in her garden when suddenly she is approached by two elders filled with a potent lust poisoning their blood. They try to assert their authority by threatening to accuse Susannah of adultery if she does not give them oral pleasure, or some such thing.

Below is Gentileschi’s painting. If you read up about her life you might imagine what relevance the story had to her own experiences. I’d like to see this version repainted with… well, hell, you could put just about any female actress in the role of Susannah, and any film producer in the role of the elders.

t5kugm.jpg


Another idea I had was if we took the Frans Hals painting below: Banquet of the Officers of the St George Militia Company, and changed all the male faces into those of the current Cronulla Sharks team members we’d have an arcane and curious correlative concupiscence. Some people might wonder why I didn’t choose something a little more Bacchanalian, like this scene by Magnasco, with all it’s salacious activity amidst the classical ruins references. But I think Magnasco’s painting is about as subtle as a fart in a church funeral. If you look at the Franz Hals version of the Cronulla Sharks banqueting, it’s not exactly clear what the message is, I don’t think, at first.

rhsjrn.jpg


Finally, this wonderful portrait by Spain’s Francisco Goya of King Ferdinand VII is a brilliant example of just how ballsy portrait painters for the courts of European monarchs could be, and just how little regard they held for their royal subjects. Goya seems to have delighted in making Ferdinand look like a stunted, hair-lipped, dickless man bereft of humility when, in truth (if the painting never lies) he seems to have had much to be humble about. And, ralking about humility, I’d like to see this painting redone with celebrity judge Simon Cowell filling Ferdinand’s lunchbox. My goodness, look at this, Simon’s face is actually quite similar to Ferdinand’s after a few days at St Tropez.

295wnkm.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Frans_Hals_-_Banket_van_de_officieren_van_de_Sint-Joris-Doelen_thumb.jpg
    Frans_Hals_-_Banket_van_de_officieren_van_de_Sint-Joris-Doelen_thumb.jpg
    106.1 KB · Views: 0

the big boy

Hammerhead
Joined
Jun 7, 2010
Messages
342
Reaction score
7
Addressing the SMH Agenda:



Its been pretty plain over the past couple of days that the Sydney Morning Herald has ramped up its agenda to unsettle our club and has firmly put the blowtorch onto our Chairman, Damian Irvine. As is usual in these things, the truth is meekly lying somewhere under a frozen tundra of half truths, bull**** and petty revengeful lies. Let me address the 'issues' that the Herald believes will bring our club to its knees below.

D. Irvine approached Ricky to appoint Paul Gallen as captain: This can hardly be disputed as an email was leaked to the journo by a member of the board. My point is; so what? Paul Gallen is a sharks lifer, week in, week out he is head and shoulders above the rest of the players and leads the team with monumental, herculean efforts. I know for a fact that he was gutted to lose the captaincy last year. His penance for an idiotic comment has been paid. Uncle Trent, whilst being a fine player and leader has been wishy washy at best about his future and seemed certain to retire at years end. Irvine's email was merely a suggestion and was written with due respect and courtesy. Whats the big deal? He wasn't insisting Gal was instated at Trent's expense and from day 1 the decision was always Ricky's.

Irvine has lost the support of the board and will be asked to stand down. I'm not privy to boardroom conversations, but I do know that if this was true (and I highly doubt it) it cant even be done constitutionally. I'm pretty sure that for a chairman to be ousted this needs to go to a vote of the membership(Gows set up was different because he brought the club into disrepute, apparently). Irvine always struck me as the kind of bloke who would stand down if he felt he had lost the support of the majority of the board anyway. I'm willing to bet he has the entire board behind him, bar one or two Pierce supporters who are responsible for the leaks.

Debbie Feeney is dodgy. From what I understand, Debbie did a magnificent job in turning around the fortunes of the Marconi club. In doing this she had to step on a few toes by changing the clubs old world culture. Now that she has left, the knives are out. To me, this indicates that she is the woman for the job at the Sharks. Fearless, driven and with results on the board. There is no police investigation into the alleged fraud, because the Marconi club wont release all of the details. What does that tell you?

Ricky Stuart is a hard, proud man with contact across the media from decades in the game. He is able to pull favours in and he can be vicious and petty. Seems a strange coincidence to me that as soon as the pressure starts getting put on his job (and rightly so, 10 wins from 40 starts) that a slew of bad press comes out about the guy who is immediately responsible for his ongoing employment.

In other news, this TAUPO deal looks pretty awesome. Taupo city council have money in the bank and want to open peoples eyes to the possibilities of the area. If the Sharks are to profit from this, then well and good!

I'm off to Leichhardt on Saturday night. I'm frightened. Last time I felt this frightened we played the Roosters away, so lets go!
2326006396274187058-8387759025396213967

http://letsgotothebigboy.blogspot.com/2010/07/addressing-smh-agenda.html

 

Ramzyv1

Great White
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
2,677
Reaction score
18
I was sad to see this thread return as I was hoping we saw the last of it last year but it is certainly appropriate for this situation. A great post and I agree with every bit of it. I am not 100% convinced Rikcy is the source of the bad press considering he has been very respectful on the way out and cares about the players (he also understands what bad press can do to those players) but Fisk on the other hand has had access to the same emails and could have leaked alot of info, as he has not been as respectful on the way out. Having said that there is no proof whatsoever to suggest Fisk is the source of the leaks either.

I really don't understand the reason the Herald is after him so much. He is very open to the media and its not like they are defending Stuart, who is a Telegraph columnist. Weird. Maybe someone could shed some light...

Their other claims:

The Beeker Shark thing just means they are going with the whole "internet cowards with anonymity". I can safely say most people on here would say the same things to players and management to their faces (perhaps more respectably than voiced on here though) if we were asked our opinion. This is our only outlet though.

The Nathan Brown approach: as Buz has said elsewhere, this has been heavily publicly denied by Irvine. As I believe Fitz said in the past, after listening to the audio of him denying it, either he is tellingt the truth or is the best liar in the world.
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2010
Messages
8,228
Reaction score
168
Location
Sutherland Shire
I dont know Richard Fisk personally but from what i know he is a champion bloke & gentleman. He wouldnt do this to the sharks.
 

Ramzyv1

Great White
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
2,677
Reaction score
18
I dont know Richard Fisk personally but from what i know he is a champion bloke & gentleman. He wouldnt do this to the sharks.

Ok well I still know very little about him at all so I am probably being a bit unfair then. Plus could easily be Pierce supporters on the board as has been said.
 
Top