HaroldBishop
Megalodon
Oh, and recent evidence suggests that Pap is not a star player when his team is not making 15 line breaks per game.
Yep
Oh, and recent evidence suggests that Pap is not a star player when his team is not making 15 line breaks per game.
I think there are four star fullbacks in the game (Mitchell, Ponga, Tedesco and Trbojevic).Was just a quick list to illustrate my point that Kennedy is a middle of the road NRL fullback. Where would you place each player?
Papz was never 100% after returning from injury. Lotta injury-plagued fullbacks this year. Maybe Kennedy deserves points for durability?
Ponga might be a star fullback but he's not deserving of it imo until he becomes more consistent. 3 or 4 good games a season doesn't cut it.I think there are four star fullbacks in the game (Mitchell, Ponga, Tedesco and Trbojevic).
Then there are two more groups: established and “still getting established”. WK belongs in the established group. Walsh belongs in the other one. That's about all you need to say. WK is a "middle of the road" fullback in that he is not one of the best 4, but also not one of the bottom 4 or 5.
You are also calling out the most important "fullback things" as the ones other guys do well. There are a half a dozen things WK does better than Brimson imo, but Brimson is certainly better at sniffing around the ruck and supporting a half break.
Yeah - fair call.Ponga might be a star fullback but he's not deserving of it imo until he becomes more consistent. 3 or 4 good games a season doesn't cut it.
Ponga needs to be way more consistent. I think's he overrated, IMO.Ponga might be a star fullback but he's not deserving of it imo until he becomes more consistent. 3 or 4 good games a season doesn't cut it.
You also need to take into account price. Ponga on 1 mil a season, compared to WK on 5-600k...I would take WK and use the money elsewhere.Ponga might be a star fullback but he's not deserving of it imo until he becomes more consistent. 3 or 4 good games a season doesn't cut it.
I think there are four star fullbacks in the game (Mitchell, Ponga, Tedesco and Trbojevic).
Then there are two more groups: established and “still getting established”. WK belongs in the established group. Walsh belongs in the other one. That's about all you need to say. WK is a "middle of the road" fullback in that he is not one of the best 4, but also not one of the bottom 4 or 5.
You are also calling out the most important "fullback things" as the ones other guys do well. There are a half a dozen things WK does better than Brimson imo, but Brimson is certainly better at sniffing around the ruck and supporting a half break.
I think "middle of the road" is making it sound more disparaging than I meant. I also think Papenhauzen probably deserves to be in that top tier given how up and down the rest of those players have been this year.I think there are four star fullbacks in the game (Mitchell, Ponga, Tedesco and Trbojevic).
Then there are two more groups: established and “still getting established”. WK belongs in the established group. Walsh belongs in the other one. That's about all you need to say. WK is a "middle of the road" fullback in that he is not one of the best 4, but also not one of the bottom 4 or 5.
You are also calling out the most important "fullback things" as the ones other guys do well. There are a half a dozen things WK does better than Brimson imo, but Brimson is certainly better at sniffing around the ruck and supporting a half break.
I disagree, but I've never rated Papenhuyzen as high as most. I think he is the perfect compliment to a good team, but can't put his team on his back like those other 3.I think "middle of the road" is making it sound more disparaging than I meant. I also think Papenhauzen probably deserves to be in that top tier given how up and down the rest of those players have been this year.
Tough year for fullbacks. Teddy probably finishes the season as the number one #1, but even he started the year slow and IMO is past his prime.
Salary aside, which fullbacks would you swap Kennedy for?
I agree with this too, but I wouldn't call Edwards a star. He's an established player who is great at his job, but you wouldn't break the bank for him.I would still say Edwards is a step above those other established players.
100%I disagree, but I've never rated Papenhuyzen as high as most. I think he is the perfect compliment to a good team, but can't put his team on his back like those other 3.
... and Pap is the poster boy for "up and down". Against Manly he was the worst player on the field for 70 minutes and then the best for 10.
I agree with this too, but I wouldn't call Edwards a star. He's an established player who is great at his job, but you wouldn't break the bank for him.
Exactly and what people need to understand is WK knows our systems and way we play, I wouldn't be hastily making a change. He is a good reliable fullback100%
Panthers very lucky to have him come up with them, he won’t break the bank but will do everything possible to make his efforts count
Nah I’ve seen him in their games - his try line defence/one on one tackles and carries from kicks change things for them, that goes a long way in starting your momentum and stopping the other teams momentum which means they have to reset/start all over again.Better guide would be rate all fullbacks 1-5 on
Durability
Ball Playing
Positioning
Organising Defence
Support Play
High Kick Safety
Offensive Kick Positioning
Hard Yards
Contract Value
X-Factor
Score out of 50
Just quick thought so may have missed a category or two that should be there.
Also on Edwards, fantastic for Panthers and definitely a good fullback but if it was the dying seconds and they need a try do they look to him? I think that's why he's not in same tier as your Latrell, Turbo, Teddy & Pongas.
Also never seen him singlehandedly keep Panthers in the game or win a game like those guys do.
He's good but he's not a match winner. He wouldn't let you down in Origin but you'd take the three other NSW guys all well before him without much discussion.
Tend to agree, he changes the game in different ways for them.Nah I’ve seen him in their games - his try line defence/one on one tackles and carries from kicks change things for them, that goes a long way in starting your momentum and stopping the other teams momentum which means they have to reset/start all over again.
Those things are massive
Yep, I'd agree. And his role in that team isn't to carry them. That's Cleary's, Luai's and Yeo's job. To'o too.Nah I’ve seen him in their games - his try line defence/one on one tackles and carries from kicks change things for them, that goes a long way in starting your momentum and stopping the other teams momentum which means they have to reset/start all over again.
Those things are massive
All Storm fans I know reckon they were actually better last year when Hynes played fullback.Yep, I'd agree. And his role in that team isn't to carry them. That's Cleary's, Luai's and Yeo's job. To'o too.
It is Ponga's job. And Paps in a lot of ways... that Storm team was completely different without his speed off Munster tearing up the edges.
Interesting... they're more fickle than we are. Though Victorians think Victoria is the best State...All Storm fans I know reckon they were actually better last year when Hynes played fullback.
For sure, but if he was good enough to carry them it would become part of his role.Yep, I'd agree. And his role in that team isn't to carry them. That's Cleary's, Luai's and Yeo's job. To'o too.
It is Ponga's job. And Paps in a lot of ways... that Storm team was completely different without his speed off Munster tearing up the edges.
Yeah a lot of ones I see would have rather kept Hynes tooAll Storm fans I know reckon they were actually better last year when Hynes played fullback.
I believe Storm were alsoAll Storm fans I know reckon they were actually better last year when Hynes played fullback.