Official Toby Rudolf

Gumby

Jaws
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
15,193
Reaction score
2,210
Location
Melbourne
His form? Do you mean his health?

Surely nobody has an issue with Toby’s play the last 3 weeks.
Health/ability to stay on the park. I was half asleep when I wrote this 😂

I’m seriously worried he may have to medically retire in the next year or so.
 

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,096
Graham Annesley says there was no issue with the tackle.
I'm OK with this. There were a few last year that were penalised and put on report that he later said shouldn't have because there was no "drop".

Players sometimes roll their ankles in rugby league. We don't have to punish someone for it every time.

Same for head clashes.
 

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,096
I'm confused now. We were talking about a Bateman tackle, and the was what Annersley talked about.

Fox were showing one by Api though which was way worse. Are they just **** stirring? Is the Api one from a different year or something?

... or was the Api one from earlier in the game and the NRL completely missed it? Api got him first and Bateman finished him off?
 

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,096
OK... figured it out. Api hip drop was in the 10th minute. Toby gets hit in the head and stays down. Nobody even bothered to check for hip drop.
 

apezza

Great White
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
4,272
Reaction score
2,007
I wish Annesley addressed why the Api tackle wasn't charged. They all must have missed it.
 

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,096
I wish Annesley addressed why the Api tackle wasn't charged. They all must have missed it.
More misdirection and confusion from the NRL.

We get a 10 minute explanation of the criteria for hip drops. They show one which doesn't quality but ignore one which quite clearly was.
 

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,096
...or was that what Api got a fine for?

Koroisau accepted a $1000 fine for a Grade 1 Dangerous Contact charge while Utoikamanu was also fined $1000 after entering an early guilty plea to a Grade 1 Careless High Tackle charge.

Edit - yes.

Api Koroisau (Wests Tigers)

  • Grade 1 Dangerous Contact on Toby Rudolf (10 min)
  • Base penalty $1500
  • His options
    $1500: plea of no contest / guilty at judiciary
    $1000: guilty - early plea
  • PLEA: Guilty - early plea. $1000
Stefano Utoikamanu (Wests Tigers)

  • Grade 1 Careless High Tackle on Toby Rudolf (10 min)
  • Base penalty $1500
  • His options
    $1500: plea of no contest / guilty at judiciary
    $1000: guilty - early plea
  • PLEA: Guilty - early plea. $1000
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,127
Reaction score
5,993
Location
IN A BAR
...or was that what Api got a fine for?

Koroisau accepted a $1000 fine for a Grade 1 Dangerous Contact charge while Utoikamanu was also fined $1000 after entering an early guilty plea to a Grade 1 Careless High Tackle charge.
Both Koroisau and Utoikamanu were hit with a Grade 1 Dangerous Contact charge for a tackle they were both involved in, on Sharks forward Toby Rudolf.

Does that clarify or confuse you more?
 

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,096
Both Koroisau and Utoikamanu were hit with a Grade 1 Dangerous Contact charge for a tackle they were both involved in, on Sharks forward Toby Rudolf.

Does that clarify or confuse you more?
All good. Found it.

I was confused because the Fox video was talking about Bateman while showing footage of the Api one.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,127
Reaction score
5,993
Location
IN A BAR
All good. Found it.

I was confused because the Fox video was talking about Bateman while showing footage of the Api one.
Yeah I just looked at that also - looks like that's the tackle for both charged.
The Bateman one (which is the one that injured his ankle yeah? Or added to damage from this one) was deemed by NRL to not be traditional enough.
I haven't rewatched that one, Fox bungled that segment a bit.
 
Top