First of all, sorry if there is already a thread for this, had a quick look but didn't see one.
I was wondering if you guys really think Tim Smith is better than SFP? In my eyes he has more raw talent and tricks up his sleeve, but that this is accompanied by more errors and weaker defense. It also seems to me that SFP had the better long range kicking game.
I understand why Smith is there as he probably does add a bit more spark, but I still think Porter was pretty hard done by. After all he hasn't even had a full season in 1st grade, and while we narrowly avoided the spoon, the team seemed more competitive last year. + Porter is a local boy and a loyal player as we saw when he played in Rd 1 following the death of his sister. The club and the media both talked up his loyalty, but the club must look bad by not returning that loyalty to him.
I don't necessarily think SFP is a better option than Smith, just want to see what you all think. Also, does Smith have a good nickname yet? Cause SFP is the greatest.
I was wondering if you guys really think Tim Smith is better than SFP? In my eyes he has more raw talent and tricks up his sleeve, but that this is accompanied by more errors and weaker defense. It also seems to me that SFP had the better long range kicking game.
I understand why Smith is there as he probably does add a bit more spark, but I still think Porter was pretty hard done by. After all he hasn't even had a full season in 1st grade, and while we narrowly avoided the spoon, the team seemed more competitive last year. + Porter is a local boy and a loyal player as we saw when he played in Rd 1 following the death of his sister. The club and the media both talked up his loyalty, but the club must look bad by not returning that loyalty to him.
I don't necessarily think SFP is a better option than Smith, just want to see what you all think. Also, does Smith have a good nickname yet? Cause SFP is the greatest.