Western Sharkie
Jaws
WK will want some job security so I can understand why he wouldn’t take a 1 yr deal
You didn't see his tackle on Averillo in the trial mate?1 year unless he learns to tackle
Until Kennedy is consistent and also picks up his defensive game, he isn't a must have.Dykes is a weapon - different style of player then Kennedy
If you can somehow have a combination of Kennedy,Dykes,Trindall and Hynes on the field at the same time it will be game over for a lot of teams
dykes again isnt great in defenceUntil Kennedy is consistent and also picks up his defensive game, he isn't a must have.
Dykes, Trindall, Hynes must be kept. But for the sake of discussion, the only way to keep those 4 your mentioned on the field at the same time is if Trindall is hooker I think?
A two year extension has become a no brainer. Even a mutual 3rd year wouldn't be the worst outcome.
Not sold on the idea of Trindall to hooker personally, don't think he'd be better than BlaykeIf brailey doesn’t workout maybe we can turn trindall into a hooker.
If brailey doesn’t workout maybe we can turn trindall into a hooker.
Not sold on the idea of Trindall to hooker personally, don't think he'd be better than Blayke
he has become the forum flogging boy. Different to the whipping boy because the whipping boy gets whipped but for the other guy apparently you have to flog yourselfWould definitely need to work on those small grubber kicks into the in goal area if he did move to hooker.
Not sure why this is in the Will Kennedy thread thou
You not sold on it because it's a silly idea.Not sold on the idea of Trindall to hooker personally, don't think he'd be better than Blayke
did you see his attempt on deardon in the semi final?You didn't see his tackle on Averillo in the trial mate?
No need. Brailey has worked out.If brailey doesn’t workout maybe we can turn trindall into a hooker.
we all did, when he was injureddid you see his attempt on deardon in the semi final?
the tackle on averillo was awesome but also very lucky, was impressed that he put in the effort to get there but i have also seen every tackle or lack there of since. he misses just as many as he makes.
which i dont think is good enough
i dont think he should be stopping rcg one on one but he should be stopping the deardon ones
Just thought I'd point out that making 11 of 18 tackles isn't missing over 50%so whats his excuse for missing over 50% of his tackles this year?
made 11
missed 6
ineffective 1
probably the same excuse that teig wilton missed 8 tackles in a game lad. you arent in his threadso whats his excuse for missing over 50% of his tackles this year?
made 11
missed 6
ineffective 1