BurgoShark
Super Moderator
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
- Messages
- 12,868
- Reaction score
- 4,097
I can't think of a prop who would suit Fitz-ball more than AFB.
Swap for Kaufusi sounds like a fair deal
Swap for Kaufusi sounds like a fair deal
Nah you move heaven and earth for him.
They wanted Toby a few years ago and are losing their best prop. Offer him and anyone else they want.
The player(s) leaving wouldn’t necessarily have to go to the Warriors.I don’t think he’d want to move there anyway and I don’t think the Warriors would want to go for him again. He had the chance and he backed out.
None of our other forwards are on enough coin to cover AFB’s wages as far as I know, maybe you can offer two, but again, you’d have to find two of our forwards who’d be willing to uproot their lives at very short notice and move to another country.
This would be an extremely difficult deal for us to do.
The player(s) leaving wouldn’t necessarily have to go to the Warriors.
Maybe, but the Warriors released both Walsh and Curran without demanding anything in return. They understand the geography too.Hm thats true. But you’d think they’d want something substantial in return. So at least one of them would probably have to go there, unless we bring a third club into the deal, turning into a complicated AFL style trade.
A club like the Roosters wouldn't let that stop themI don’t think he’d want to move there anyway and I don’t think the Warriors would want to go for him again. He had the chance and he backed out.
None of our other forwards are on enough coin to cover AFB’s wages as far as I know, maybe you can offer two, but again, you’d have to find two of our forwards who’d be willing to uproot their lives at very short notice and move to another country.
This would be an extremely difficult deal for us to do.
True, to free up money, depends though if Warriors would consider releasing him without compensation. I wouldn't if I'm them.The players leaving wouldn’t necessarily have to go to the Warriors.
They restricted where they would release Walsh, they wanted Curran goneMaybe, but the Warriors released both Walsh and Curran without demanding anything in return. They understand the geography too.
Maybe, but the Warriors released both Walsh and Curran without demanding anything in return. They understand the geography too.
Immediate release for compassionate grounds to be closer to his parents.Hm thats true. But you’d think they’d want something substantial in return. So at least one of them would probably have to go there, unless we bring a third club into the deal, turning into a complicated AFL style trade.
A club like the Roosters wouldn't let that stop them.
Immediate release for compassionate grounds to be closer to his parents.
If they release him on them conditions then I don’t think any club will have to give them anything to later sign AFB
We’d still have to convince two or more players to move on to try and fit him in. He’s on a **** tonne of coin and with the Warriors reluctance to actually want to move him on, I doubt they’d feel charitable as far as contributing a good chunk of his salary goes.
How many spots do they have free?
How many spots do they have free?
Yeah straight on the phone to players managers who only have 1 year to run with us and probably not in our future plans. Then straight on to his manager and start working out what it’s going to take to land him hereWe’d still have to convince two or more players to move on to try and fit him in. He’s on a **** tonne of coin and with the Warriors reluctance to actually want to move him on, I doubt they’d feel charitable as far as contributing a good chunk of his salary goes.