slide rule
Jaws
I thought the problem was meant to be that the senior players were calling the shots, not that the senior players were not calling the shots.
I don't know who to believe!!
I don't know who to believe!!
Nah mate not having a go.
But Sharps making the decisions, wasn't there a problem where the senior players wanted a particular junior to play but he refused. There was talk that Lewis didn't think he was being used properly but no Sharp plays him there. Constantly we argue together against his selections, enough is enough of this coach.
Lets get some fresh minds in and start new.
Don't think you will get any arguments about Sharp's coaching credentials mate. He has always been a terrible head coach at the top level, it's a disgrace that 1) he was offered the reigns, and 2) he accepted when he doesn't want to be a head coach. It's not a job you can do half-arsed.
Still, as I said, our captain shouldn't be saying this **** publicly imo.
Not sure what your point is? If you go back and have a look I have been nothing but highly critical of Sharp's appointment and his ability as a coach. I don't think our captain should be coming out and saying what he did publicly though.
What i hate is, people are calling for Sharps head, not for him to be returned to his post as assistant, but believe he should be sent packing because he was a **** interim coach.
The call to run it this way, no matter what, was up to the club, and they decided no to outsource a bloke for a year. I dont care if 'sharp took it on even though he didnt want to', the club made this decision. And i dont think any coach woulda helped us any more. Our players are immature, our players are not fit (partly coaching/partly attitude). Our captain needs to actually be a captain now. Not just say he doesnt wanna win a wooden spoon, but ****ing walk into training and rip Blake Ayshfords head off, and tape it to a goal post as a reminder for all the other useless lazy ****s we have playing for us
personally I think Gal and the rest of the ****s not giving 100% should use some of their ridiculously large wages, to pay back the members who probably earn less than a quarter of what they do, who have spent their money trying to support a team that doesn't give a ****.
Maybe you should be me the 20 seconds of my life I wasted back for reading this cancer of a post.
so your happy spending your money to support a group of guys to earn bucketloads of cash who are only giving half arsed efforts?
fmd i'll be hitting you up for sponsorship for my next fight.........I might even train for it.......
That's the nature of the beast, no one is forcing you to spend the money.
dont lie to the forum, your misses put you in the choke chainAnd that's one of the reasons I haven't been spending much time on the corner of abuse this year. They don't give a **** so why should I?
dont lie to the forum, your misses put you in the choke chain
personally I think Gal and the rest of the ****s not giving 100% should use some of their ridiculously large wages, to pay back the members who probably earn less than a quarter of what they do, who have spent their money trying to support a team that doesn't give a ****.
dont lie to the forum, your misses put you in the choke chain
but she made him go right?haha ill vouch for him, its not his missus.
They were going to an engagement party on saturday, and mick even tried to chuck a sicky on it to come to the game haha
That's the nature of the beast, no one is forcing you to spend the money.
maybe so but to suggest the players should pay back the members is idioticIt's the nature of the beast that we may lose from time to time, or even get the spoon. But it's not acceptable for players on big wages to be treating this as a gap year.
Some people are paying near $1000 per year for their memberships. There is a moral obligation for them to put in.
Even if they don't have respect for the members, you'd expect them to at least care about their own careers and reputations.