Official Jack Williams

D

Deleted member 2543

Guest
Shortfin Mako said:
I watched that game live. We did not seem to have any energy to be aggressive. I think we were gassed - the week before took a lot more out of us physically, mentally and emotionally I think.
Click to expand...
That wasn't the middles' fault. The Sharks had enough possession in the Souths end to win 3 games.

bort said:
NRL prop said we were hardest pack to play against but forum knows best.
We were **** because we didn’t have anyone throwing high tackles and getting away with them… of course we’d hate that person for that too
Click to expand...
(y)

Something else to consider... 4 Sharks forwards featured in the top 10 in the NRL statistically for decoy runs. Adjusted for minutes played Toby Rudolf and McInnes are the two of the best middle forwards in the NRL "off the ball".

bort said:
Blake Lawrie… now I know he’s **** but that just means he has more better players than him he has to play against so like him, it does carry some weight
Click to expand...
:ROFLMAO: Thanks for adding weight to the above. Lawrie is the only prop in the NRL who had more decoy runs than Toby. What a player does when he doesn't have the ball matters.

For middles... McInnes, Rudolf, Jurbo, Lawrie, Cotter. Nobody comes near those 5 guys (except Tolman, but he's gone now :(). Lots of second rowers and halves feature heavily in those stats. Very few middles.
 
Thresher

Thresher

Jaws
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
25,647
Reaction score
4,571
Location
Melbourne
Dream job. Decoy runner and marker in defence.

I used to do heaps of decoy runs when I was playing prop in high school open division.

I had a feeling that the half back didn't like me though because I was always calling for the ball.
 
D

Deleted member 2543

Guest
Thresher said:
Dream job. Decoy runner and marker in defence.

I used to do heaps of decoy runs when I was playing prop in high school open division.

I had a feeling that the half back didn't like me though because I was always calling for the ball.
Click to expand...
:ROFLMAO: players who think they are getting it make the best decoys!

Make it second marker too. Just tap the other bloke on the ass and tell him to do the hard bit. Job done!
 
bort

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
33,466
Reaction score
9,150
Location
IN A BAR
Thresher said:
Dream job. Decoy runner and marker in defence.

I used to do heaps of decoy runs when I was playing prop in high school open division.

I had a feeling that the half back didn't like me though because I was always calling for the ball.
Click to expand...
Season I played at prop the ****s actually kept passing to me, much more tiring than just taking the decoy haha
 
bort

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
33,466
Reaction score
9,150
Location
IN A BAR
BurgoShark said:
:ROFLMAO: Thanks for adding weight to the above. Lawrie is the only prop in the NRL who had more decoy runs than Toby. What a player does when he doesn't have the ball matters.

For middles... McInnes, Rudolf, Jurbo, Lawrie, Cotter. Nobody comes near those 5 guys (except Tolman, but he's gone now :(). Lots of second rowers and halves feature heavily in those stats. Very few middles.
Click to expand...
That’s interesting, I wouldn’t have paid much attention to Lawrie through season especially off ball but I wouldn’t have guessed that.

Tbf to him I think he’s actually got half decent last couple seasons. Not rep player, but better than I thought he’d be. Gotta be the heaviest of the boys you’ve listed too, can’t make extra efforts easier
 
Gards

Gards

Jaws
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
18,913
Reaction score
2,754
Location
At the Tucky
Hunt really stepped up last season IMO - thought he was strong for us and had some powerhouse games

Williams has been poor when played in the backrow in years gone by, he is a bench middle that is where he plays best and a role he can keep it simple in and avoid the cluster of errors previously was prone to

Paul Gallen must have had the least decoy runs of any forward in history lol - if his legs were moving, it was to get the ball
 
Gumby

Gumby

Jaws
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
16,835
Reaction score
3,624
Location
Melbourne
Yeah this bloke is not a second rower imo. Needs to be bench middle if he’s to play.
 
bort

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
33,466
Reaction score
9,150
Location
IN A BAR
Gumby said:
Yeah this bloke is not a second rower imo. Needs to be bench middle if he’s to play.
Click to expand...
Him or perhaps Colquhoun could come in if two of Nikora/Wilton/Graham are out. With maybe McInnes or the other ones of those two spending some time there to keep them from doing 80.

That's more a reflection of depth in that position than it being a position they ideally play though. Probably our shallowest spot.

Don't think O'Kane (train and trial) improved his stocks much in trial 1 and not named in trial 2.
 
D

Deleted member 2543

Guest
bort said:
Him or perhaps Colquhoun could come in if two of Nikora/Wilton/Graham are out. With maybe McInnes or the other ones of those two spending some time there to keep them from doing 80.

That's more a reflection of depth in that position than it being a position they ideally play though. Probably our shallowest spot.

Don't think O'Kane (train and trial) improved his stocks much in trial 1 and not named in trial 2.
Click to expand...
Probably don't want Wade playing 80 these days tbh. Imo one of those guys probably gets minutes if either of Briton/Teig don't play.

I think trial #1 was likely an addition for Jesse to see if he can be that "4th back rower". He has the motor, and while imo his long-term future is as a middle, having do spot duty at back row would be a good way to get him NRL experience.

It also raises the question of whether or not you want Wade playing on the right side if Briton is the guy out. If the left edge is Teig's spot, surely we should be done with the "move Teig to the right so Wade can play left" business.
 
bort

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
33,466
Reaction score
9,150
Location
IN A BAR
BurgoShark said:
Probably don't want Wade playing 80 these days tbh. Imo one of those guys probably gets minutes if either of Briton/Teig don't play.

I think trial #1 was likely an addition for Jesse to see if he can be that "4th back rower". He has the motor, and while imo his long-term future is as a middle, having do spot duty at back row would be a good way to get him NRL experience.

It also raises the question of whether or not you want Wade playing on the right side if Briton is the guy out. If the left edge is Teig's spot, surely we should be done with the "move Teig to the right so Wade can play left" business.
Click to expand...
True, if it was him we'd probably still see a Williams/Colquhoun/McInnes spend some time there.
I do agree we shouldn't move Teig right so Wade might only see decent edge minutes if injury on the left, unless he is comfortable spending some time on his non-preferred edge
 
Sparkles

Sparkles

Jaws
Joined
May 21, 2008
Messages
12,974
Reaction score
3,771
bort said:
True, if it was him we'd probably still see a Williams/Colquhoun/McInnes spend some time there.
I do agree we shouldn't move Teig right so Wade might only see decent edge minutes if injury on the left, unless he is comfortable spending some time on his non-preferred edge
Click to expand...
Yeah, surely we're at the stage where Tieg gets preference
 
Sevshark

Sevshark

Great White
Joined
Oct 11, 2021
Messages
4,942
Reaction score
3,670
BurgoShark said:
For middles... McInnes, Rudolf, Jurbo, Lawrie, Cotter. Nobody comes near those 5 guys (except Tolman, but he's gone now :(). Lots of second rowers and halves feature heavily in those stats. Very few middles.
Click to expand...

Why'd you have to remind me. 😪😪
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top