Game on NOW Thread

SF

Mako Shark
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
9,974
Reaction score
1,545
Location
Monty Porter Stand
One of the underlying problems for me is all the stoppages in the last 5 minutes that are turning the game into basketball.

Yes it's good for TV, but it means that a team can be comfortably the better team all game and then lose to a few trick shots at the end.

And it means more of these crucial last-second decisions.

The clock should have just been allowed to run out as he was taking the kick at goal.
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2010
Messages
8,228
Reaction score
168
Location
Sutherland Shire
Gotta admit I don’t love the footy as much as I used to.
Decisions like the Tigers game, the Dale charging & others where there is some real intent but they escape MRC attention.

On top of that the crusher tackle where players feign injury to milk a penalty, most crusher tackles the ball carrier is putting themselves into that situation yet the defenders have to somehow adjust themselves mid tackle to not cop a penalty.

The refs or the video ref, who more often than not include themselves by tipping the on field ref it’s a penalty have no common sense feel for the actual tackle, the ones where the player has the ball carrier held upright then drops down on them I can cop & admit it’s a penalty every day of the week but 75% minimum of the crusher tackles penalised should be play on.

Then there’s the hip drop tackle, again, the ref has no feel for what’s an accident or just pure momentum of bodies in a tackling process, by all means, penalise the deliberate intent of such a tackle but again, most hip drop tackles penalised are just plain bad luck & shouldn’t be penalised.
 

apezza

Great White
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
4,384
Reaction score
2,130
Gotta admit I don’t love the footy as much as I used to.
Decisions like the Tigers game, the Dale charging & others where there is some real intent but they escape MRC attention.

On top of that the crusher tackle where players feign injury to milk a penalty, most crusher tackles the ball carrier is putting themselves into that situation yet the defenders have to somehow adjust themselves mid tackle to not cop a penalty.

The refs or the video ref, who more often than not include themselves by tipping the on field ref it’s a penalty have no common sense feel for the actual tackle, the ones where the player has the ball carrier held upright then drops down on them I can cop & admit it’s a penalty every day of the week but 75% minimum of the crusher tackles penalised should be play on.

Then there’s the hip drop tackle, again, the ref has no feel for what’s an accident or just pure momentum of bodies in a tackling process, by all means, penalise the deliberate intent of such a tackle but again, most hip drop tackles penalised are just plain bad luck & shouldn’t be penalised
The hip drop one annoys me. 99% don't get charged but the penalty at the time really hurts.

For those type of incidents just let the MRC review - unless they are glaringly obvious.
 

Sparkles

Jaws
Joined
May 21, 2008
Messages
12,087
Reaction score
2,825
maybe, but someone needs to keep Gus in line. Be a bit boring without him. Just wish he wouldn't interrupt and speak over people.
Always taking up the last comment and getting in the way of the point
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
14,990
Reaction score
3,506
Location
Perth WA
The hip drop one annoys me. 99% don't get charged but the penalty at the time really hurts.

For those type of incidents just let the MRC review - unless they are glaringly obvious.
I can’t believe you just posted “just let the MRC review”.

The MRC is a big part of the problem.
They are just as inconsistent (if not more so) than the refs and bunker as it is (which says a lot).

Giving them even more responsibility (or lack of judgement, lack of balls to make a right call) is flirting with even more danger.

3 or 4 teams will be playing full contact footy and the rest will have to be content with touch footy.
 

apezza

Great White
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
4,384
Reaction score
2,130
I can’t believe you just posted “just let the MRC review”.

The MRC is a big part of the problem.
They are just as inconsistent (if not more so) than the refs and bunker as it is (which says a lot).

Giving them even more responsibility (or lack of judgement, lack of balls to make a right call) is flirting with even more danger.

3 or 4 teams will be playing full contact footy and the rest will have to be content with touch footy.
Agree but at least it won't affect the game at the time.

Also if more teams fight stupid charges then that will stop the MRC from citing stupid charges to begin with.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,285
Reaction score
6,137
Location
IN A BAR
Agree but at least it won't affect the game at the time.

Also if more teams fight stupid charges then that will stop the MRC from citing stupid charges to begin with.
That's why the early plea discount is so much, so you never want to fight it.

If Nelson wanted to argue his lifted forearm charge (which admittedly would be unwise) he goes all the way from $3k fine to a 2 match suspension!

Dale's punishment is 50% worse if he unsuccessfully argues it. It's structured so you just cop it and move on unless you wanna play 10k plus for a lawyer to BS you out of it like that a shoulder charge isn't a shoulder charge if it is the safest thing for both players
 
Top