Free To Air Sharks

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,070
Reaction score
7,850
Location
Sydney
This week channel 9 haven't even picked the Manly v Melbourne game as a Friday night of Sunday afternoon game. The last six rounds were only scheduled very recently yet they still give Parra and Wests TV games. These ********s can complain about ratings for as long as they want, it's all of their own doing.
 

Beejay

Carcharodon Megalodon
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
4,531
Reaction score
29
Location
Melbourne
It just baffles me that 9 when given the choice of who they would put on TV some 10 weeks ago for the final rounds chose to put on the side that had already locked away the wooden spoon.

Channel 9 picked all of their games before the season started

my mate, a parra fan mind you, had the storm at 40+, paid $3.05, he was pretty happy

Wow I though Sharks fans were pessimistic!
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,070
Reaction score
7,850
Location
Sydney
Channel 9 picked all of their games before the season started



Wow I though Sharks fans were pessimistic!

No, they didn't. They picked the first 20 rounds. The last six rounds were picked about 8 weeks ago.
 

Beejay

Carcharodon Megalodon
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
4,531
Reaction score
29
Location
Melbourne
No, they didn't. They picked the first 20 rounds. The last six rounds were picked about 8 weeks ago.

Yes, they did.


Can't win a game, can win ratings
By: Brent Read
Jul 5, 2013

PARRAMATTA has barely won a game this season but the Nine Network is now relying on the struggling Eels to help deliver them a victory in the ratings over the final six weeks of the NRL's regular season.

Parramatta will play four games on free-to-air TV in the final six rounds -- the same amount as league-leading South Sydney and more than top-four sides the Sydney Roosters, Manly and Melbourne.

In fact, only Brisbane has more games on free to air TV than the Eels leading into the finals. Cronulla, Canberra and North Queensland -- all still in the mix for the finals -- received no love from Nine when the schedule for the final six rounds was released yesterday.

In the Raiders' case it came as no surprise. They've been overlooked for years by free-to-air broadcasters. The Eels, on the other hand, have regularly featured on Nine and therein lies the problem.

Under the new fixed-draw system, all games were locked in before the season began.

However, the final six rounds retained some flexibility, allowing the broadcasters to horse trade matches before they were made public.

It is understood the Melbourne-South Sydney game in round 22 was originally on Fox Sports but the broadcasters were able to negotiate a deal that saw the game transferred to Nine.

Nine also attempted to rid itself of the Wests Tigers-Parramatta game that night -- both sides are in the bottom three and it would be a surprise if either figured in the finals equation. But in a sign of how far the respective clubs have fallen, Fox Sports rejected the offer.

While Parramatta's surfeit of free-to-air games was a talking point, it wasn't the only one. Souths will have four blockbuster Friday night games over the closing six weeks, including matches against the Storm, the Sea Eagles, the Bulldogs and the Roosters.

The final round will include stand-alone games on Thursday and Friday nights.

As revealed in The Australian yesterday, the NRL also announced a return to Saturday afternoon football, with Canberra and St George Illawarra hosting games in the experimental time slot.

"At this stage we are not considering making Saturday afternoon football an ongoing part of the NRL match schedule," NRL football operations director Nathan McGuirk said.

"There is, however, a curiosity both on our part and of our broadcasters to see how fans respond to the time-slot, both in terms of game-day attendance and TV ratings."

As always, there were winners and losers in the scheduling. As so often is the case, the Broncos emerged with a slew of free-to-air games over the remaining six weeks. Newcastle and South Sydney also fared well.

But there was only disappointment in the nation's capital.

"We're happy to get some Sunday afternoon games in winter," Canberra chief executive Don Furner said.

"It's always helpful from a crowd perspective. But certainly we're once again disappointed not to get some channel Nine games.

"Certainly the sponsors, and the major sponsors, want to see some coverage on channel Nine. Free-to-air everybody has got. It would be good if we got on there some more."

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...-can-win-ratings/story-fnca0von-1226674527434
 

Beejay

Carcharodon Megalodon
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
4,531
Reaction score
29
Location
Melbourne
We knew who was playing who over the last six rounds but the games were not scheduled until around 8 - 9 weeks ago. That story in rubbish which is unfortunate for the journo.

http://www.nrl.com/2013-nrl-draw-released/tabid/10874/newsid/70437/default.aspx

Yes, the games were not scheduled until round 16. I did not say that, however I was correct in saying that Channel 9 did choose all of their games before the start of the season.

There is nothing in that article you produced that suggests I am wrong or my article is 'rubbish'.
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,070
Reaction score
7,850
Location
Sydney
How did channel 9 pick their games for the last six rounds at the start of the year if the games weren't scheduled?
 

Beejay

Carcharodon Megalodon
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
4,531
Reaction score
29
Location
Melbourne
How did channel 9 pick their games for the last six rounds at the start of the year if the games weren't scheduled?

Well quite easily. They had rights to the games, but they just hadn't scheduled them yet. Those two things are not the same.
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,070
Reaction score
7,850
Location
Sydney
Doubt it. Why wouldn't they wait until later in the season to pick their games? If they already picked their games at the start they may as well released the full draw instead on the first 20 rounds only.
 

Gil

Sharkaholic
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
9,617
Reaction score
96
Location
Area 51
Channel 9 couldn't pick a ring in a shop full of assholes.
 

Beejay

Carcharodon Megalodon
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
4,531
Reaction score
29
Location
Melbourne
Doubt it. Why wouldn't they wait until later in the season to pick their games? If they already picked their games at the start they may as well released the full draw instead on the first 20 rounds only.

It says in the article channel 9 and fox sports had the opportunity to trade matches, and decide upon which games would get the better time slot based on how each team was going at the time.

You can doubt it if you would like, but I think this situation gives the best explanation of why the Eels and Tigers have so many channel 9 games. If the games were not all picked before round 1, then there is no way those two teams would still regularly be on channel 9.
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,070
Reaction score
7,850
Location
Sydney
It says in the article channel 9 and fox sports had the opportunity to trade matches, and decide upon which games would get the better time slot based on how each team was going at the time.

You can doubt it if you would like, but I think this situation gives the best explanation of why the Eels and Tigers have so many channel 9 games. If the games were not all picked before round 1, then there is no way those two teams would still regularly be on channel 9.

Seems really stupid if that's how it has been done. I thought the idea of scheduling the last 6 rounds later in the year was so these muppets could get better games to televise? Doesn't make sense to me.
 

Beejay

Carcharodon Megalodon
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
4,531
Reaction score
29
Location
Melbourne
Seems really stupid if that's how it has been done. I thought the idea of scheduling the last 6 rounds later in the year was so these muppets could get better games to televise? Doesn't make sense to me.

Yeah I agree. I don't think they should have changed the way scheduling was done, as doing it so many weeks in advance would only benefit those teams with the largest supporter bases, which has happened this year.

Smaller teams like the Sharks who are playing well can now not be rewarded with FTV exposure due to the inflexibility of the draw.
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,070
Reaction score
7,850
Location
Sydney
Yeah I agree. I don't think they should have changed the way scheduling was done, as doing it so many weeks in advance would only benefit those teams with the largest supporter bases, which has happened this year.

Smaller teams like the Sharks who are playing well can now not be rewarded with FTV exposure due to the inflexibility of the draw.

Makes no difference. We weren't rewarded last year with FTA games after sitting in the top 4 for a while. I'd much rather have it fixed. Makes it easier to plan ahead, especially if travelling for a game.
 
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
28,420
Reaction score
784
Location
NSW
Doubt it. Why wouldn't they wait until later in the season to pick their games? If they already picked their games at the start they may as well released the full draw instead on the first 20 rounds only.

simple, 21-26 were all picked subject to change. channel 9 would have all the say in changes
 
Top