EPL 2020/2021

snowman

Total gronk
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
58,928
Reaction score
2,200
Location
In your head, rent free
Devastating for the youngster, he was really starting to make a name for himself. I hope we see him again this season, but that seems unlikely!

4 months it sounds like, huge chunk for him to miss

he was playing well, 18 and forced his way into the starting line up at Liverpool
 

Flanno

Great White
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
4,934
Reaction score
1,090
4 months is huge but at least it means we see him again this season. Though I’d imagine in that case it will more likely be 6 months till he starts playing again because Klopp would want to ease him back in
 

CrazyMatt

Jaws
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
23,129
Reaction score
2,816
Location
Colyton, Sydney
I notice we still cant edit posts in here. *groooan*.

Regarding Bruno’s miss: you know funnily enough I was sitting there with my partner watching and was feeling very annoyed about the absolute dogshit I’d witnessed and I said to her as he was lining up for the pen “he’ll put it into row ****ing Z, its been that kind of game”.

Edit: SF fixed it for us, we can edit posts again here.
 
Last edited:

Flanno

Great White
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
4,934
Reaction score
1,090
Bruno won’t be taking the next penalty when Ronaldo is on at the same time…
 

Flanno

Great White
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
4,934
Reaction score
1,090
why should they have bent over for city? The number was always 160 mill and 150 probably would've got it done . City offered 100 mill sorry but that's not even close.
Have you watched how Spurs were playing without Harry Kane compared to how they are playing now with a clearly disinterested and unmotivated Kane?

They will be lucky to get 100mil for him now, with Haaland and Mbappe seemingly available next summer. They could’ve spent the money elsewhere in strengthening the squad, a bit like Liverpool did with Coutinho.
 

CrazyMatt

Jaws
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
23,129
Reaction score
2,816
Location
Colyton, Sydney
why should they have bent over for city? The number was always 160 mill and 150 probably would've got it done . City offered 100 mill sorry but that's not even close.

Kane’s sulking this year, he’s clearly unhappy and not playing well so his value will only continue to plummet. Levy would of been smart to take the money instead he wanted to make some sort of misguided statement, now look at them.
 

deep blue jaws

Oceanic Whitetip Shark
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
843
Reaction score
101
Location
wollongong
so if city came after say mo salah or bruno fernandes from both of ur teams and they were keen to go although ur chairman values them at a certain amount you'd be happy if ur chairman took only a portion of what he valued them at? Kane can sulk all he wants the price was set from the beginning , he needs to pull his head out of his arse and be pissed at city for only valuing him at the amount they did.
As for his price going down yeah im sure it will but other clubs will have money now that stadiums have opened and im pretty sure theyll still get 100 mill next season if he's still desperate to leave
 

Flanno

Great White
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
4,934
Reaction score
1,090
so if city came after say mo salah or bruno fernandes from both of ur teams and they were keen to go although ur chairman values them at a certain amount you'd be happy if ur chairman took only a portion of what he valued them at? Kane can sulk all he wants the price was set from the beginning , he needs to pull his head out of his arse and be pissed at city for only valuing him at the amount they did.
As for his price going down yeah im sure it will but other clubs will have money now that stadiums have opened and im pretty sure theyll still get 100 mill next season if he's still desperate to leave
100mil is plenty mate, I don’t think Kane is worth much more than that. Different story if they offered say only 70mil. Also it’s a bit different because both Liverpool and Utd are in the Champions League, whereas Spurs are not and Kane is no spring chicken. He’s staring down the barrel of never winning a club trophy. You can understand why Kane wanted to leave. Having said that, Kane does have himself to blame because he’s the one who signed a long contract.

Spurs were looking like more of a team without him than they are with him and that money could’ve been reinforced into the squad to further strengthen their team overall. I don’t see the value in keeping a sulking player, regardless of how good they are.
 

snowman

Total gronk
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
58,928
Reaction score
2,200
Location
In your head, rent free
Kanes not worth anywhere near 150mil.

The bloke barely tracks back or puts a shift in and scores some penalties and a bunch of tap ins.

Speaking of lads no worth money, Sancho
 

CrazyMatt

Jaws
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
23,129
Reaction score
2,816
Location
Colyton, Sydney
Kanes not worth anywhere near 150mil.

The bloke barely tracks back or puts a shift in and scores some penalties and a bunch of tap ins.

Speaking of lads no worth money, Sancho

Regarding Sancho, I’m still not worried, I dont think you’d be writing a Liverpool guy off not even 10 games into his club career so sorry if I’m taking your opinion on this with a grain of salt.

That McTominay/Fred midfield is what you should be directing your humour at. Ole’s obsession with those two will bring down his management, mark my words.
 
Top