sharkstragic
Jaws
It would seem that communication is not their strong suit. Well, not recently anyway.Nobody asked me my name until the third person. That in itself is a worry.
It would seem that communication is not their strong suit. Well, not recently anyway.Nobody asked me my name until the third person. That in itself is a worry.
They probably sent the response to the wrong address with 5 membership packs.Sam, just for reference, I did in fact call and ask for information on any proposal to reintroduce board remuneration, seeking clarification on whether the board was proposing to leave the resolution as it was (no remuneration) or to seek approval to pay directors.
I spoke to three people, none could give me an answer and although I left my details for someone to call me, that call never came.
Imagine how much concern could have been avoided with a simple answer!
They probably sent the response to the wrong address with 5 membership packs.
you obviously missed this part? the dick sucking line was there no longer than a minute. if your too big to accept an appology when its given than that just shows what type of person you are..
mate, i was critical of some of the things irvine did as well, and as well as bazza before him. what irvine did good far outweighed the bad. what this board have done so far the bad far outweighs the good so im going to give it them.
dont bother mate. you will get called an imbecile and shot down for not attending the agm and being on the DI bandwagon and having blinkers on.
did i leave anything out?
I think a more acceptable term is "partaking of the blue vein cigar"I called you an imbecile for your stupid dick sucking comment.
I accept your apology. Let's move on.
What have they done that's so bad, and I mean things that can be substantiated, not just opinion and hearsay on here.
I called you an imbecile for your stupid dick sucking comment.
:lmaoI'm starting to think that Godwin's Law has now been surpassed by what I shall define as the "Fellatio Ratio"
loss of sponsorship (although they have said sponsorship has increased?? have to look a little more closely to see that it seems to have been tacked on somewhere, but i believe the figures will be more reflective of the apparent loss we are seeing now in the next financial report)
lack of transparency. - not consulting members on issues and making decisions on our behalf that should be made by us (refinancing the loan without consultation)
spending outside our means - you just need to see the financial report to see that we have blown budgets everywhere in one year.
lack of understanding of our current situation (raising the membership prices quite substantially in the current environment was just a bloody stupid decision)
thats just a few that spring to mind.
my main gripe is that they sailed in the coat tails of the asada drama promising that they were the best to lead to us through all this asada crap and would have heaps of sponsors because of their business contacts at the high end of town....what have we got so far? remondis stadium and a few smaller sponsors. hisense walking mid term, knocking back several potential sponsors in the current climate because they offered what the baord seemed 'not enough'.
they used scare tactics and emotion to get in and IMO have just lied their way in. good on them for their campaign though, they get points for that.
i also give them points for seemingly not stuffing up the development. i just hope that they have other plans in place to make money instead of just thinking we will have $40mil soon, we will be fine.
I still want to know what that humungous marketing amount was spent on...
the new social media dudeI still want to know what that humungous marketing amount was spent on...
Bumper Stickers
:lmaoSnowman showed he can produce high quality bumper stickers for a truckload less than $4M ...
Fair points, a couple I have the same issue with myself.
So, what response have you had, what explanation have you been provided? There would be a lot of factors that people on here just wanted know.