Western Sharkie
Jaws
Warriors, Roosters and Dogs have 120+ but after 7 games (so they are close to our D as well if you go points per game)32 of those were from the Tigers. If we stepped up in that game we'd be well and truly first.
Warriors, Roosters and Dogs have 120+ but after 7 games (so they are close to our D as well if you go points per game)32 of those were from the Tigers. If we stepped up in that game we'd be well and truly first.
How much is Williams on?Latest Sharkcast has a bloke from club saying Dales next year is about 300k and we def get that back (this year tbd).
Suggests Jack likely to be offered around 400s-500s and hoping he will stay for that, it would be a pay cut and less than offered elsewhere.
He didn’t say, just that that range would be a pay cutHow much is Williams on?
****, I would have thought 400-500’s would be right
He didn’t say, just that that range would be a pay cut
That was David Riccio from the Telegraph.Latest Sharkcast has a bloke from club saying Dales next year is about 300k and we def get that back (this year tbd).
Suggests Jack likely to be offered around 400s-500s and hoping he will stay for that, it would be a pay cut and less than offered elsewhere.
Ah I didn’t quite catch who it was and cbf going back haha cheersThat was David Riccio from the Telegraph.
He usually has the inside on the Sharks though so I'd assume he'd know as much as any outsider.
He's definitely the most on the money out of any of them though.Ah I didn’t quite catch who it was and cbf going back haha cheers
I'd piss off it I were him. How can we offer less when his form has improved since his last contract and the cap has increased.Latest Sharkcast has a bloke from club saying Dales next year is about 300k and we def get that back (this year tbd).
Suggests Jack likely to be offered around 400s-500s and hoping he will stay for that, it would be a pay cut and less than offered elsewhere.
Tbf his current contract scaled up with the cap increase, so he has already benefitted from that.I'd piss off it I were him. How can we offer less when his form has improved since his last contract and the cap has increased.
Surely what ever we have left to pay Dale this year won’t be counted?Latest Sharkcast has a bloke from club saying Dales next year is about 300k and we def get that back (this year tbd).
Suggests Jack likely to be offered around 400s-500s and hoping he will stay for that, it would be a pay cut and less than offered elsewhere.
Just read the start of the Dale thread and there's a mention of a tweet from Riccio saying that Dale's 4th year was $320k. That should be a little more with the it being ratcheted up?That was David Riccio from the Telegraph.
He usually has the inside on the Sharks though so I'd assume he'd know as much as any outsider.
Yeah, they were saying in the podcast mentioned that the Club were waiting for confirmation from the NRL about what the remainder of his contract for this year means under the cap.Just read the start of the Dale thread and there's a mention of a tweet from Riccio saying that Dale's 4th year was $320k. That should be a little more with the it being ratcheted up?
Hopefully we can save Dale's money from this year too and front load a new contract for him to get through the unders we need to pay him next year.
lol "sharks adamant" yet it just quotes nicko..... the tricky thread is on hiatus, so i will just say, what a ****ing disaster.Sharks adamant Trindall absence won't derail NRL season
Cronulla players are adamant that Braydon Trindall's absence won't ruin their table-topping start to the NRL season, after...www.yasstribune.com.au