NRL Round 13: Cronulla Sutherland Sharks vs. Parramatta Eels Sunday 9 August 4:05pm @ Netstrata Jubilee Stadium

snowman

Total gronk
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
58,928
Reaction score
2,200
Location
In your head, rent free
From spectators point of view the 50/50 one was a tough one but winning it would have been pretty big in helping us pile on the pressure to start the game.
Win it and we get the ball back attacking them, lose it and the only negative is lose the challenge. Think Wade took a punt on a 50/50 with a low risk high reward which if that was along his line of thinking I don't mind it.

thing is, when you lose it so early, the other team can basically do what ever the **** they want and keep their hands all over the ball

there are better things to waste a challenge on than an offside kick chaser in the 9th minute of a game
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,583
Reaction score
6,393
Location
IN A BAR
thing is, when you lose it so early, the other team can basically do what ever the **** they want and keep their hands all over the ball

there are better things to waste a challenge on than an offside kick chaser in the 9th minute of a game

For sure there is also a fair argument to keep it until you either really need it or just calls you're super sure of

But you'd hope the ref will get enough right calls that they can't just keep their hands all over the ball and do whatever the **** they want because the chance of getting penalised for doing the wrong thing should be hugely greater than the chance of getting away with it but having it overturned by successful challenge, especially when it comes to the strip v loose carry lottery

Statistically if Wade doesn't use it there he just gets something else wrong later anyway

Not saying it was a 100% the right play, just I can understand the logic to risk it to keep the pressure on
 

slide rule

Jaws
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
20,485
Reaction score
465
Location
General Admission
Eels and sharks are two of the best animals for those conditions. Eels were a bit better because it wasn’t quite deep enough for a shark.
 

SharkShocked

Bull Shark
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
2,311
Reaction score
54
thing is, when you lose it so early, the other team can basically do what ever the **** they want and keep their hands all over the ball

there are better things to waste a challenge on than an offside kick chaser in the 9th minute of a game

100% this i was with a Parra mate in the stands and could not believe we were challenging something like that so early on. Seemed to me we got confident after the early successful challenge and rolled the dice.
 
Joined
Apr 27, 2010
Messages
9,007
Reaction score
912
Location
Sydney
thing is, when you lose it so early, the other team can basically do what ever the **** they want and keep their hands all over the ball

there are better things to waste a challenge on than an offside kick chaser in the 9th minute of a game

I think unless you're 100% certain you're not wasting a challenge and there's zero risk you just don't use it the first half. Save it for the second half when it might be more game defining.

Also I'm 50/50 on that ball from Fergo being a knock on they should have played to the whistle and not stand around expecting a knock on. That's where our inexperience was shown. They'll learn from it.
 

SharkShocked

Bull Shark
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
2,311
Reaction score
54
I think unless you're 100% certain you're not wasting a challenge and there's zero risk you just don't use it the first half. Save it for the second half when it might be more game defining.

Also I'm 50/50 on that ball from Fergo being a knock on they should have played to the whistle and not stand around expecting a knock on. That's where our inexperience was shown. They'll learn from it.

The knock on wasn't the thing that pissed me off with that entire passage of play it was the penalty against woods. See a thousand of those 'crowding' moments every game... bloke dropped the ball because he tried to play it too fast and we get pinged for it. That's what pissed me off.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,583
Reaction score
6,393
Location
IN A BAR
look, i dont think it was a knock on, but that gets called every week

you are right though, we shouldnt have given up

100% need to always play the whistle, something people should learn early in juniors but often never do

As commentators said it'd be a knock on 9 times out of 10. Takes me back to early in the year and Ronaldo got bowled by a ball straight between his legs, gave it a touch on way through but 100% nothing but backwards and we got pinged for it.

The knock on wasn't the thing that pissed me off with that entire passage of play it was the penalty against woods. See a thousand of those 'crowding' moments every game... bloke dropped the ball because he tried to play it too fast and we get pinged for it. That's what pissed me off.

Reason he did it was because he knew it was odds on not to get called
They did crowding as bad as that for no call at least once I specifically remember, and most likely a bunch of other times to a lesser extent.
Personally I'd like to see refs just call that every time, if PTB is on the mark and marker leans their knees into it then penalty. If you come forward off the mark expect ref to stop play and send you back to the mark.
 

Sparkles

Jaws
Joined
May 21, 2008
Messages
12,208
Reaction score
2,959
thing is, when you lose it so early, the other team can basically do what ever the **** they want and keep their hands all over the ball

there are better things to waste a challenge on than an offside kick chaser in the 9th minute of a game

Think you're putting too much importance on the challenge. I find it hard to believe that single challenge changes how the games played. Questioning the first few decisions in a game might piss the ref off though, which could influence things. I think it did a bit... that and Moylan being called out constantly.

Personally I'd prefer to see it saved for a more critical moment, but I wouldn't be surprised if the teams mentality was to try and get the advantage early. Using it in that way makes sense, especially in those conditions.

Either way, you get it right or wrong. If you're wrong it's irrelevent when it's used.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,583
Reaction score
6,393
Location
IN A BAR
Think you're putting too much importance on the challenge. I find it hard to believe that single challenge changes how the games played. Questioning the first few decisions in a game might piss the ref off though, which could influence things. I think it did a bit... that and Moylan being called out constantly.

Personally I'd prefer to see it saved for a more critical moment, but I wouldn't be surprised if the teams mentality was to try and get the advantage early. Using it in that way makes sense, especially in those conditions.

Either way, you get it right or wrong. If you're wrong it's irrelevent when it's used.

Pretty much, especially given how often they are wrong (although I think Captains are getting better at them). Being wrong early isn't likely to be noticeably worse than being wrong later.
I think there is a lot of value in trying to use it to gain an upper hand early rather than trying to hold it in case there is a crucial moment later - not to say either is always the 100% correct plan but both have value.
Turning around that early call and getting a try might mean a crucial moment to challenge never comes up later.
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,550
Reaction score
8,451
Location
Sydney
Was just one of those games tbh, anything can happen in ****house conditions like that. You definitely need a bit of luck.

Obviously would have preferred to win but I'm not overly disappointed.

OK might retract this. We'd be equal 4th on the ladder atm if we won this.
 
D

Deleted member 3365

Guest
OK might retract this. We'd be equal 4th on the ladder atm if we won this.

That game was a very important one for us to win, that's why it hurt more. This is why we can't be "oh well better luck next time", no, every win counts and every point counts, games like that can either get us a top 4 position with an extra chance in the finals, or one chance with a harder path.
 

Gards

Jaws
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
18,517
Reaction score
2,157
Location
At the Tucky
Or if we didn't throw away a win and 2 points against the Storm with a pointless penalty towards the end of the game. that one hurt me more as the win was pretty much in the bag and we shot ourselves without reason.

Parra loss we had some 50/50 officiating hurt us and we couldn't defend it out but we didn't throw it away

Every freagin season I look at the table and think of the games we should have won but didn't and fantasize about where we should rightfully be on the table
 
D

Deleted member 3365

Guest
Or if we didn't throw away a win and 2 points against the Storm with a pointless penalty towards the end of the game. that one hurt me more as the win was pretty much in the bag and we shot ourselves without reason.

Parra loss we had some 50/50 officiating hurt us and we couldn't defend it out but we didn't throw it away

Every freagin season I look at the table and think of the games we should have won but didn't and fantasize about where we should rightfully be on the table

Yup agree on the Storm match too.
We are honestly our worst enemy, could potentially be sitting in the top 4 if we win our Rabbits, Storm and Parra games.
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,550
Reaction score
8,451
Location
Sydney
Yup agree on the Storm match too.
We are honestly our worst enemy, could potentially be sitting in the top 4 if we win our Rabbits, Storm and Parra games.

Thing is plenty of teams can say the same thing though. Lost a game or 2 they should have won.
 
Top