Women's Team Rejected by NRL.

slide rule

slide rule

Jaws
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
20,480
Reaction score
464
Location
General Admission
Club Statement

Tue 27 Mar 2018, 09:32 AM
The Cronulla Sharks were yesterday informed by the NRL of their decision not to grant our Club a franchise licence for the NRL Women’s Premiership (NRLWP).

With just four teams accepted from the six clubs to submit bids, the Sharks met with the NRL’s Head of Football Brian Canavan and Tiffany Slater, Senior Manager Women’s Elite Program, where they learnt their application to take part in the inaugural Women’s Premiership had been unsuccessful.

Not only did the Sharks break new ground in contracting women players in 2017 and in fielding a team in a series of promotional matches as curtain-raisers to NRL games, they have also put enormous time, effort and resources into the Club’s Tarsha Gale Cup team and in creating female pathways.

The Sharks surprise and disappointment at the NRL’s decision stems from the thoroughness of their licence presentation, a submission they were told was amongst the best of those entered, emphasising their commitment to Women’s rugby league in the Sutherland Shire and to the NRLWP.

After being informed of the NRL’s decision, Sharks CEO Barry Russell expressed his frustration.

“I am extremely disappointed and dumbfounded by the decision,” Russell said. ‘’We have sound experience and in-depth knowledge of women’s rugby league after launching the Cronulla Sharks Women’s Series team and hosting the Women’s Rugby League World Cup in 2017.

“The focus our Club has given to the women’s pathway, from the Tarsha Gale team, to the introduction of League Touch and the commitment to offer the same opportunities to women as we do men, which all makes this decision difficult to comprehend.”

With the Club’s history of support for Women’s Rugby League, adding to the experience, expertise, resources, commitment and passion at the Club to ensure the competition would be strong and sustainable, the Sharks were confident they were in the best position to be one of the inaugural clubs in the NRL Women’s Premiership (NRLWP).

Financially the Sharks Women’s Premiership team had also received strong commercial support, including a six-figure jersey naming rights partner, should the licence submission had been successful.

“We have already shown a commitment to make a women’s team and program work within an NRL club setting and have been pioneers in women’s rugby league,” Russell said.

“We have numerous key learnings from our experience in 2016 and 2017 and first-hand practical knowledge of what it takes to ensure a sustainable, financially sound, entertaining, and game changing NRLWP team, program and competition.

“Our fans and Members want our Club to be one they can believe in, they want us to do things that matter and align with our Club’s vision and values. Having an NRLWP Team would have helped to complete us as a Club, while adding to our purpose,” Russell concluded.

Russell and Sharks Chairman Dino Mezzatesta will request a meeting with NRL CEO Todd Greenburg and NRL management seeking further clarification as to their unsuccessful licence application.
Click to expand...

I hate this organisation so much.
 
SF

SF

Mako Shark
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
9,972
Reaction score
1,542
Location
Monty Porter Stand
What a rort and disgusting we now have to choose whether to develop players for the Dragons and Roosters, or let it all fall away.

It may help us get back to profitability though.
 
Riverside MF

Riverside MF

Tiger Shark
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
1,391
Reaction score
234
Well this decision makes it clear in the NRL’s future vision of Cronulla.

There isn’t one.
Cronulla is not part of their future.
 
HaroldBishop

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,083
Reaction score
7,881
Location
Sydney
What a ****ing disgrace. Easts and St George get a gig ahead of us, after everything we've done for the wonen's game.

They can get ****ed. Get ****ed. Get ****ed. Get ****ed.
 
deano the p

deano the p

Jaws
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Messages
17,985
Reaction score
207
I always assumed we would be in after everything we've done. I didn't even think there was a chance we wouldn't be.
 
Gards

Gards

Jaws
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
18,385
Reaction score
1,946
Location
At the Tucky
Yea would have though we would be the first club accepted - NRL have laid their cards bare on this unless there is something we don't know...
 
BlackWhiteBlue

BlackWhiteBlue

Jaws
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
28,420
Reaction score
784
Location
NSW
We should have been the first team considered. No team has done the amount for the womens game that we have.

Nrl could have also used our stadium to its advantage playing a few different games outta there
 
S

samshark

Bull Shark
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
2,350
Reaction score
71
I can understand the logic behind having teams geographically spread out as there are too many Sydney teams in the NRL but to include Roosters and St George over sharks is an absolute joke.
Sharks kill them both for junior league numbers boys and girls and the sharks have led the way in the womens game.
This decision stinks of underhanded deals and self interest.
 
SF

SF

Mako Shark
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
9,972
Reaction score
1,542
Location
Monty Porter Stand
Given there is no roadmap to expand to all clubs, I think a joint Sydney club would have been better than just giving it to the Roosters (who everyone else hates). Or Sydney and Western Sydney. I’m ok with Dragons getting in, representing Illawarra, as they have done plenty too.
 
HaroldBishop

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,083
Reaction score
7,881
Location
Sydney
Actually I'm OK with it now, thinking about it more there would be a ****load of girls from Bondi, Woollahra, Vaucluse, Bellevue Hill etc keen as mustard to play League.

Well done, NRL.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top