Official William Kennedy

Fullback 2025


  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .

Sparkles

Jaws
Joined
May 21, 2008
Messages
14,161
Reaction score
4,969
We got smashed 30-10 by the Raiders last time he played fullback, our equal biggest loss of the season
Because of Nicho? There's been a few close to that result where he was at 7. We lost against the Roosters 36-16 two weeks later. I don't think you can draw a line between the two.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
37,308
Reaction score
13,047
Location
IN A BAR
Because of Nicho? There's been a few close to that result where he was at 7. We lost against the Roosters 36-16 two weeks later. I don't think you can draw a line between the two.
I didn't want Nicho moved to 1 and we lost badly, I'm drawing loads of lines!
 

apezza

Jaws
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
10,251
Reaction score
9,544
There's a few on here that have been asking for a change at FB for a while now.

Looks like you got your wish
 

Thresher

Jaws
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
26,603
Reaction score
5,766
Location
Melbourne
Kennedy is the pace and unpredictability in most of our attacking backline sweeps.

He's 8th in the comp for line break assists.

I hope we're not going to miss him as much as I think we are.
 
Joined
Apr 27, 2010
Messages
10,982
Reaction score
3,372
Location
Sydney
Would love to hear the explanation the NRL provides.

If it's a case of we just missed it and there's a cut off they have to charge people then they should be amend that. I'm not saying weeks later but up till the Tuesday when they name a squad they should be able to review and charge anything.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
37,308
Reaction score
13,047
Location
IN A BAR
Would love to hear the explanation the NRL provides.

If it's a case of we just missed it and there's a cut off they have to charge people then they should be amend that. I'm not saying weeks later but up till the Tuesday when they name a squad they should be able to review and charge anything.
Yeah the only issue I see would be they miss something on Sunday game that doesn't come up until Tuesday or Wednesday, but that team plays Thursday and have already named their side. Maybe if within X many days of the next game, or after team list already up, any suspension wouldn't apply until the next week.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2005
Messages
20,993
Reaction score
5,078
Location
The Ridge!
Would love to hear the explanation the NRL provides.

If it's a case of we just missed it and there's a cut off they have to charge people then they should be amend that. I'm not saying weeks later but up till the Tuesday when they name a squad they should be able to review and charge anything.
I think it was missed because Will didn't go off the field immediately. He was looked at by the trainer but played on to the end.

There was a time we were told that injuries don't come into the charges. If it's a bad tackle, it's a bad tackle no matter what.

These days it seems more like there needs to be a serious injury before the MRC will do anything.

I reckon if Stephen Crichton's ear hadn't been split open the way it was, Dale would not have been charged.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
37,308
Reaction score
13,047
Location
IN A BAR
I think it was missed because Will didn't go off the field immediately. He was looked at by the trainer but played on to the end.

There was a time we were told that injuries don't come into the charges. If it's a bad tackle, it's a bad tackle no matter what.

These days it seems more like there needs to be a serious injury before the MRC will do anything.

I reckon if Stephen Crichton's ear hadn't been split open the way it was, Dale would not have been charged.
Lets see if Radley's head is as special as Crichtons ear, or if it's more of a WK ankle
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2005
Messages
20,993
Reaction score
5,078
Location
The Ridge!
Lets see if Radley's head is as special as Crichtons ear, or if it's more of a WK ankle
That was pretty gory wasn't it. The blood just flowed and flowed.

Turpin must have a pretty hard head, he didn't bleed at all.
 

apezza

Jaws
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
10,251
Reaction score
9,544
I think it was missed because Will didn't go off the field immediately. He was looked at by the trainer but played on to the end.

There was a time we were told that injuries don't come into the charges. If it's a bad tackle, it's a bad tackle no matter what.

These days it seems more like there needs to be a serious injury before the MRC will do anything.

I reckon if Stephen Crichton's ear hadn't been split open the way it was, Dale would not have been charged.
Yep. In hindsight Will should have stayed down - not try his uptmost best to stay on the field and do the right thing.

Looking at the tackle again - that was the classic one on one hip drop. The tackler twisted his body so he could use his own body weight on Will's legs. If he tackled him facing forwards to drag him down it would not have happened

I will give the ref / bunker on the night the benefit of the doubt as he did get up however there is absolutely no excuse for the MRC.

Yet Dale showed no duty of care.....
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
37,308
Reaction score
13,047
Location
IN A BAR
Just hoping it's not one of our guys on the end (either end) of the dangerous throw they choose to ignore this week to keep things consistent.
 
Top