Official Wade Graham

  • Thread starter Deleted member 3365
  • Start date
Lumpy

Lumpy

Bull Shark
Joined
Aug 24, 2009
Messages
2,301
Reaction score
35
Location
The Shire
As good as G.I is I don't think he is the answer to our problems. We need someone who can give us some spark and organisation skills.
 
camo

camo

Bronze Whaler
Joined
Jul 11, 2010
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
Location
sutho
Graham is great to fill the big shoes of barret :)
 
Blix

Blix

Great White
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
3,474
Reaction score
148
Graham whilst solid and young is no world beater yet.

Saying that, he is crucial for us, at the moment we need at least one decent half for next season, 2 would be much better though (Smith is a deadset liability)
 
Mark^Bastard

Mark^Bastard

Great White
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
17,725
Reaction score
167
Location
Brisbane
I'd prefer Kelly if we had the right half back.

Only really because we already have Kelly.
 
Wilson

Wilson

Great White
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Messages
3,095
Reaction score
540
snowman said:
really... wow
Click to expand...

Wade Graham is just as hit and miss as Kelly is. Wade Graham's kicking game is laughable, in particular his short kicking game. Kelly will be a better prospect then him.

All these are reasons why I'd prefer Kelly to him. He's massively over-rated and would be a waste of the sort of dollars he'd be demanding, when we already have someone better then him in our own ****ing backyard.
 
snowman

snowman

Total gronk
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
58,928
Reaction score
2,200
Location
In your head, rent free
how much longer we have kelly depends on his attitude..
we have porter as well in our back yard, you happy to have him.
im all for getting graham, as he is a better half than we have bar baz!
 
Wilson

Wilson

Great White
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Messages
3,095
Reaction score
540
snowman said:
how much longer we have kelly depends on his attitude..
we have porter as well in our back yard, you happy to have him.
im all for getting graham, as he is a better half than we have bar baz!
Click to expand...

Again I'll say it. Even if he is better then Kelly, it's only very very marginal. It's like having Cronk as your halfback and then going out all guns blazing to sign Thurston as your halfback, because he's better then the current halfback. (Don't bring in 5/8th into the analogy like I know you will because it's irrelevant).
 
snowman

snowman

Total gronk
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
58,928
Reaction score
2,200
Location
In your head, rent free
marginally better... if he was only marginally better, im sure he would be in our team. if he is only marginally better, why are we reading that we are going after graham and not sticking with kelly....? hot tip, graham is better, alot better. but kelly can grow and become a good player. he just isnt ready yet. throwing kelly in would see us with the same results and this place hammering him for being ordinary
 
Wilson

Wilson

Great White
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Messages
3,095
Reaction score
540
snowman said:
marginally better... if he was only marginally better, im sure he would be in our team. if he is only marginally better, why are we reading that we are going after graham and not sticking with kelly....? hot tip, graham is better, alot better. but kelly can grow and become a good player. he just isnt ready yet. throwing kelly in would see us with the same results and this place hammering him for being ordinary
Click to expand...

Hahaha, ahhh. You speak some rubbish. This place will be hammering Graham for being ordinary. Because he is ordinary. 59 tackles on the Warriors line and he could only come up with 6 points. This in a team which across most of the park is better then our team. Sounds like a sort of player this website would love to have on board.

Sounds like a much better option than Kelly..
 
snowman

snowman

Total gronk
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
58,928
Reaction score
2,200
Location
In your head, rent free
yet they beat st george and he was MOM, we havent. they only scored 6 points and its his fault. what about walsh and lewis, im sure they played a more leading role in attack than him? when walsh didnt play against st george he scored a running try and put in a nice kick for simmo to score. yesterdays performance meant nothing on a average day for the panthers. graham is a better option than we have now, is a good player, and if he wasnt he wouldnt be in demand. how many of our halves on the open market would attract as much attention as he has?
 
Wilson

Wilson

Great White
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Messages
3,095
Reaction score
540
snowman said:
yet they beat st george and he was MOM, we havent. they only scored 6 points and its his fault. what about walsh and lewis, im sure they played a more leading role in attack than him? when walsh didnt play against st george he scored a running try and put in a nice kick for simmo to score. yesterdays performance meant nothing on a average day for the panthers. graham is a better option than we have now, is a good player, and if he wasnt he wouldnt be in demand. how many of our halves on the open market would attract as much attention as he has?
Click to expand...

He played well agaisnt a Dragons team that was missing 4000 players. Good on him.

Walsh isn't a creative player, don't bring him into it to improve your argument. Because we both know it's not the case. With 59 tackles on the Warriors line and you can only come up with 6 points in a team like the Panthers, playing at 5/8th - it's just flat out **** and unacceptable. - Also like to point out an average day for the Panthers come down to their halves. They were camped inside the Warriors half.

His demand is massively over the top at the moment because their are very few halves on the open market.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top