Official Thomas Hazelton

[Blue_Eyes84]

I'm excited to see the Big Nut in action again next season. He already looks like a veteran of the game so early in his career.

 

[BurgoShark]

3 handsome young fellas.

 

[beaver2233]

 

[egg]

View attachment 30376

NICE BEAVER !

 

[Thresher]

NICE BEAVER !

Not something I'd be shouting out in public

 

[Sparkles]

NICE BEAVER !

 

[MrDravid]

Tom Hazelton (Cronulla)

Grade 1 Careless High Tackle on Mat Croker (49 min)
Base penalty $1500
3rd+ offence last 12 months
His options:
2 matches: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
OR $3000: Guilty - early plea

 

[Ronnie]

Get out the chequebook Tommy!

 

[Western Sharkie]

Tom Hazelton (Cronulla)

Grade 1 Careless High Tackle on Mat Croker (49 min)
Base penalty $1500
3rd+ offence last 12 months
His options:
2 matches: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
OR $3000: Guilty - early plea

So that for the accidental hit on someone dropping….
What did the blatant shoulder charge get?

 

[bort]

So that for the accidental hit on someone dropping….
What did the blatant shoulder charge get?

$1500 fine (2k if he fights it)

 

[Western Sharkie]

$1500 fine (2k if he fights it)

So TH was more due to “loading”?

I hope so, cos the shoulder charge was worse than what Tommy did

 

[Sevshark]

Would have to think takes the fine, not worth missing start off season over.

A bloke randomly falling after your already committed to a tackle is a rough way to lose 3k though.

 

[Sir Chadley]

So that for the accidental hit on someone dropping….
What did the blatant shoulder charge get?

WS, you’re looking for the conspiracy angle again.

Tom’s hit was not accidental. He hit him flush on the head. And I believe it was late. Yes, the player was falling but 100% accountability on Tom.

Shoulder charges whether blatant or not only have sin bin status if hit in the head. Which it wasn’t.

Like I said in my post yesterday you’re looking through Sharks glasses mate.

 

[Sir Chadley]

So TH was more due to “loading”?

I hope so, cos the shoulder charge was worse than what Tommy did

No it wasn’t.

 

[Super Impose]

Would have to think takes the fine, not worth missing start off season over.

A bloke randomly falling after your already committed to a tackle is a rough way to lose 3k though.

What would Matterson do

FWIW - it was careless - not reckless or intentional - so with the loading - the charge is correct …

 

[HaroldBishop]

WS, you’re looking for the conspiracy angle again.

Tom’s hit was not accidental. He hit him flush on the head. And I believe it was late. Yes, the player was falling but 100% accountability on Tom.

Shoulder charges whether blatant or not only have sin bin status if hit in the head. Which it wasn’t.

Like I said in my post yesterday you’re looking through Sharks glasses mate.

Agree, Tom's was worse.

 

[Vichyssoise]

Gosford is a long way from Perth and @Western Sharkie forgot his binoculars.
Just an early preseason misstep.
He's been training the house down, he'll be fit and ready come round 1.

 

[egg]

No more Mr Nice guy .
Looking to overtake JWH in the hardman stakes

 

[Born&bred]

 

[HaroldBishop]

Haha I thought of that as well