One of my mates popped her cherry back her highschool. He was singer/guitarist in our band, he dedicated a song to her when her dad died.....we kinda gave him **** about that.....shes got a good rack tho
We sacked him for punching a girl in the nose then sign Buster who was sacked from the Broncos for breaking a woman's jaw, Please explain
:No::No::No::No::No::No::No::No::No::No::No:
You want a woman basher playing for the Sharks?
****en hell. You've gotta have some standards.
so, would you take glassy bird back?
He was acquitted remember....
Thats it, the fact he was found not guilty means he has a clean record, the record doesnt state that he glassed her, although it dont take a genious to see wat happened that night, the fact is he has no criminal charges, has dented his reputation tho
brett stewart digitally penertrated a chick ( as said in his court case) and manly treated him like a god last year
wtf??
The Brett Stewart Court case hasn't even been heard yet!
Some of you guys really need to learn the differences between fact/fiction/allegation/opinion/romanticism.
The above quote is outright libel!
Here is a statement of FACT
"I've digitally penetrated more than a few chicks in my time. Each and every one of them treated me as a God. I may or may not have treated them as Goddesses in return."
Here is a statement of FICTION
"she[Peninton]s got a good rack tho"
(wtf??? They're bloody lopsided!)
Here is a statement of ALLEGATION
"brett stewart digitally penertrated (sic) a chick"
Here is a statement of OPINION
"Kharma sorted out Brett Stewart and his fans for 2010"
Here is a statement of ROMANTICISM
"The Club should really look at trying to re-sign Greg Bird and Tevita Latu"
Stewart is charged with having sexual intercourse involving digital penetration with the girl without her consent on the evening of March 6, 2009, at North Manly in Sydney's northern beaches.
u can say sorry anytime u want
MANLY rugby league star Brett Stewart will face a jury trial over claims he sexually assaulted a 17-year-old girl after the Sydney club's 2009 season launch party.
he has been to court and pleaded innocent
Ian Byrne for Stewart announced the 24-year-old's intention to plead not guilty to one count of indecent assault and one count of sexual intercourse without consent over an alleged incident, which occurred after the NRL premiers' season launch on March 6.
Dressed in a suit and club tie, the former Test fullback made no comment as he sat at the front of the packed court.
Stewart did not say anything in court
Judge Peter Berman set a trial date of September 13.
Here is a statement of FACT
"I've digitally penetrated more than a few chicks in my time. Each and every one of them treated me as a God. I may or may not have treated them as Goddesses in return."
You can learn to read and critically evaluate any time you choose
http://www.theage.com.au/rugby-leag...-on-sexual-assault-charges-20100322-qr6h.html
You can also learn to research a bit better too.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,20797,26961738-5018866,00.html?from=public_rss
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,20797,26961738-5018866,00.html?from=public_rss
GO BUZ!:yawn::cheers
Manly star Brett Stewart free to play, sex assault committal case adjourned
By staff writers
with AAP
February 04, 2010
Manly fullback Brett Stewart is free to play in the Sea Eagles' first two games of the NRL premiership season, after his committal case was adjourned until March 22.
Sexual assault charges against Stewart are pending, with the player due back in court on March 22 after Deputy Chief Magistrate Paul Cloran adjourned the hearing at Downing Centre Local Court in Sydney.
The former Australia No.1 is accused of having sexual intercourse, involving digital penetration, with a 17-year-old female from Sydney's Northern Beaches without her consent on March 6, 2009 - hours after Manly's infamous season launch.
He is also charged with assault with an act of indecency after he allegedly "forced his tongue into her mouth".
Stewart denies both allegations.
Sea Eagles officials said after the hearing that they would allow Stewart to continue playing.
brett stewart digitally penertrated a chick ( as said in his court case) and manly treated him like a god last year
Stewart is due back in court this month that is for sure. He hasn't been given a final verdict and the word on the street is that he is in serious ****.
Even if it were a fact (which hasn't been proven), it would still require a court case.
Until someone has been found guilty, you can't make claims like this:
Without saying "allegedly"
of course its a claim, if it was a fact there would be now need for a court case.
brett stewart digitally penertrated a chick
he maybe didnt say anything in court but his legal team pleaded innocent