Sharks Leagues Club Development Plan

peachey

One of a kind
Joined
Sep 7, 2005
Messages
15,219
Reaction score
125
Location
Welcome to Emu Plains, please be sure to visit our
highlight the word if

who cares if its sharks or that company, they help put money into the club..

like the green bay packers did in the NFL they sold shares to the fans in green bay to help raise money..wonder if someone has told the board that idea
 

snapper

Tiger Shark
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
1,197
Reaction score
27
As shire said its the company building and managing the complex you would buy shares in not the football club itself.
 

Line Ball

Mako Shark
Joined
Jun 3, 2008
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Location
North Queensland
as a Shark fan from north of the border, this is good news, hope they build a motel/hotel as to get accomodation around Cronulla is ****ing expensive when we come down for a game.
 

Yahoo News

Newsbot
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
6,461
Reaction score
1
Sharks circle scheme to float


Cronulla explore a stock market float

Brent Read
June 20, 2008

CRONULLA is set to become the second rugby league club to explore a stock market float as it attempts to raise $60 million to finance a property development that could make it the richest organisation in the game.

The Sharks, from Sydney's south, have unveiled plans for a massive development of the land surrounding their home ground of Toyota Park, a concept involving the club either embracing private investment or floating an arm of its operations on the stock exchange.

The only other publicly listed rugby league club is the Brisbane Broncos, floated in May 1989. Broncos shares are trading at 23c, valuing the business at less than $23 million.

Cronulla directors believe the move will solidify the Sharks' future at a time when Sydney clubs are crying poor over the NSW Government's increased poker-machine tax.

Director Brett Crowley predicted the redevelopment could transform the Sharks into one of the richest clubs in the NRL, ensuring their future in the Sydney market. "I think that this could make us perhaps the strongest club in the NRL, at least in Sydney," he said.

The Sharks' plan for survival is eerily similar to a concept involving fellow Sydney club Canterbury Bulldogs, which ended with the club being caught cheating the salary cap.

The $800 million Oasis project was to have been a joint venture between the Bulldogs Football Club, Liverpool City Council and Macquarie Bank.

But the scheme collapsed in 2002 when it emerged that the Bulldogs had used funds from the project to make secretive payments to their players, in breach of salary-cap rules.

The Sharks' scheme would involve the development of 200 apartments, as well as retail and commercial premises.

Revenue from the investment would flow back to the football club, giving the Sharks the financial clout to compete with any side in the premiership.

Mr Crowley said the club was leaning towards a public float, a move that would stop the Sharks being held to ransom by private investors.

"That's where we're heading," he said. "This has taken on a life of its own. I have had a lot of interest. It's just a matter of getting it done."

Mr Crowley said the project would be carried out in phases, with stage one expected to be completed by the end of 2010.

The Sharks have traditionally struggled on a minuscule budget compared with their NRL rivals. While Brisbane's revenue is above $20 million, Cronulla's is about half that amount.

Its plight has been even more worrying given the state of its leagues club, which is not a noted cash cow. The club's upturn off the field has been matched this season by its performances on the field. The Sharks have been transformed into premiership contenders under coach Ricky Stuart.

Source: http://theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,23892561-25658,00.html?from=public_rss
 

Google News

Newsbot
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
80,070
Reaction score
34
Can a public float save an NRL team?

Can a public float save an NRL team?
Friday, 20 June 2008
Jeff Wall writes:

At a time when most Sydney NRL clubs are struggling financially the Cronulla Sharks are considering a $60 million stock market float to finance a property development that could secure the clubs long term future.

The Sharks are one of a number of clubs that are asset rich, especially prime land holdings, but cash flow poor because of the downturn in poker machine revenue.

If the plan to fund 200 apartments and retail and commercial premises on land surrounding the club's homeground, Toyota Park, goes ahead, the Sharks could well move from being one of the most financially vulnerable clubs in the NRL to one of the most secure.

But the history of stockmarket floats by NRL clubs is mixed. An $800 million joint venture scheme between the Bulldogs Football Club, Liverpool City Council and Macquarie Bank collapsed in 2002 with disastrous consequences for the Bulldogs. It emerged the club was using funds from the project to make secret payments to players, resulting in the Bulldogs being relegated from the top to the bottom of the premiership table.

The one float that has succeeded was the Brisbane Broncos in 1989, soon after the club was admitted to the competition. While the Broncos are now profitable, shares are trading at just over 20 cents.

The news that the Sharks are considering a float could not be better timed for the club. Under coach Ricky Stuart the Sharks have gone from being relative easy-beats in recent years to one of the genuine contenders for the 2008 premiership, currently sharing the lead with four other clubs. But the Sharks are having problems getting fans to their home matches, even though the team has been doing much better on the field.

The last thing NRL clubs, suffering from a collapse in poker machine revenue, can stand is even lower attendances, yet that is what is happening. Today’s Daily Telegraph reports that since the start of the Origin series average attendances in Sydney have dropped from 16,000 to 12,000.

While Sydney attendances are not at alarming levels, the Broncos and the Gold Coast Titans are enjoying boom times attendance-wise. The Broncos home attendances are averaging well over 30,000 while the Titans are averaging around 22,000.

With Sydney clubs in dire financial straits, and attendances in freefalling, is it any wonder that the AFL is stepping up its efforts to establish a Western Sydney base?

The float being planned by the Sharks, centred on capitalising on the value of land holdings, may end up being not only the saviour of the Sharks, but the way to save the NRL competition itself.

Source: http://www.crikey.com.au/Media-Arts-and-Sports/20080620-Can-a-public-float-save-an-NRL-team.html
 

the realist

Mako Shark
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
how ridiclous who in their sane mind would by shares in a company that is going to re-distribute profits into a sport and rugby league club which is going no-where
 

Megashark

Jaws
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
5,826
Reaction score
63
Location
Auckland NZ
Mate can you do everyone a favour and keep your opinions to yourself unless you're able and willing to back them up, and provide supporting evidence where required. It would seem that your sole purpose in coming on here is to denigrate our club and the great game of rugby league. You're as welcome on here as anyone else if you have anything positive to contribute, but I haven't seen any evidence of that in your posts so far.
 

the realist

Mako Shark
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
no, actually your just spurting unjustified 'statements'

ha ha how delusional must you be to think people would invest in a development which is going to finance a rugby league club. wake up
 

peachey

One of a kind
Joined
Sep 7, 2005
Messages
15,219
Reaction score
125
Location
Welcome to Emu Plains, please be sure to visit our
how ridiclous who in their sane mind would by shares in a company that is going to re-distribute profits into a sport and rugby league club which is going no-where

just the green bay packers..who are one of the smaller cities to have an NFL team and its worked successfully and also the brisbane broncos who also floated there club to help raise funds

and here is the story

Stock & Financial History
http://www.packers.com/history/fast_facts/stock_history/

Stock certificates from the 1923, 1950 and 1997 stock sales
Of all the reasons that make the Green Bay Packers and their story so incredible and unique, the most significant is simply this: The team is literally owned by its fans.

Presently, 112,015 people (representing 4,750,934 shares) can lay claim to a franchise ownership interest.

Shares of stock include voting rights, but the redemption price is minimal, no dividends are ever paid, the stock cannot appreciate in value, and there are no season ticket privileges associated with stock ownership. No shareholder is allowed to own more than 200,000 shares, a safeguard to ensure that no one individual is able to assume control of the club.The team has had three owners, all in its first four years, 1919-22. The first owner, Indian Packing Company, paid an unofficial purchase price of $500 to supply Curly Lambeau with uniforms and equipment. In turn, Lambeau and team manager George Calhoun called the club "Packers."

Shortly thereafter, Acme Packing Company bought Indian Packing Company and all its assets, including the fledgling team. In 1921, Lambeau convinced new owners John and Emmitt Clair to apply for membership in the new American Professional Football Association (early NFL).With the team already headed for bankruptcy, the APFA revoked the franchise after Lambeau used illegal college players in a non-league game later that year. But before the 1922 season, Lambeau by himself reapplied and the league reinstated the Packers, with Lambeau as owner. When rain threatened to sink the team in 1922, A.B. Turnbull came to the rescue.

Turnbull, publisher of the Green Bay Press-Gazette, grocery man Lee Joannes, attorney Gerald Clifford and Dr. W. Webber Kelly cancelled Lambeau's $2,500 debt, then rallied the community behind the team. In August 1923, with more than 400 in attendance at a local Elks Club, the club was transformed into a non-profit entity, the Green Bay Packers Corporation. The five men, including Lambeau, were nicknamed the Hungry Five.There now have been four stock drives in the 88-year history of the team. The first stock sale, which took place at that 1923 meeting, saw local merchants raise $5,000 by selling 1,000 shares for $5 apiece, with a stipulation that the purchaser also had to buy at least six season tickets.

The second, in 1935, raised $15,000 after the corporation had gone into receivership. At that point, the non-profit Green Bay Football Corporation was reorganized as the Green Bay Packers, Inc., the present company, with 300 shares of stock outstanding.The third, in 1950, came on the heels of founder Curly Lambeau's 30-year dominion, when the club's officers arranged to amend the corporation's bylaws to permit the sale of up to 10,000 total shares of stock (opening up more than 9,500 shares for purchase), to limit the number of shares that any individual could own. The team also increased the number of directors from 15 to 25.

The response to the 1950 drive was inspiring, with people from all across Wisconsin, as well as former Green Bay residents living in other states, coming forward to buy the $25 shares of stock. Roughly $50,000 was raised in one 11-day period alone. Reportedly, one woman from a farm near Wrightstown, Wis., showed up at the team's offices with $25 worth of quarters in a match box. A total of about $118,000 was generated through this major stock sale, helping to put the Packers on a sound financial basis once again.

The fourth came late in 1997 and early in 1998. It added 105,989 new shareholders and raised more than $24 million, monies which were utilized for the Lambeau Field redevelopment project. Priced at $200 per share, fans bought 120,010 shares during the 17-week sale, which ended March 16, 1998. With the NFL supporting the plan, the existing 1,940 shareholders overwhelmingly voted to amend the articles of the corporation on Nov. 13, 1997. The vote authorized the Packers to sell up to 1 million shares to raise funds for capital improvements, and received a 1,000 to 1 split on their original shares. Fans immediately were able to call a special toll-free number, or tap into the team's Web site for information on how to buy the 400,000 shares made available to the public.

The initial response to the recent stock offering was staggering. In the first 11 days, roughly one-third -- or $7.8 million -- of the total amount transacted was sold. Paid orders poured in at a rate of 3,500 per day during this early period, generating about $700,000 each day. The sale hit its high point during the first week of December as fans purchased shares as holiday gifts. Shares of stock were purchased by citizens from all 50 states, in addition to fans in Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Over half (or roughly 64,300) of the new shares during the 1997-98 offering were bought by Wisconsin residents, followed by inhabitants of Illinois (9,600), Minnesota (4,300), California (3,700), Florida (2,900), Michigan (2,800), Texas (2,500) and Ohio (2,000).

Today, an annual meeting of shareholders is held in July. The event returned to Lambeau Field in 2006 after several thousand people were turned away from the 2005 meeting at the nearby Resch Center. As a means of running the corporation, a board of directors is elected by the stockholders. The board of directors in turn elect a seven-member Executive Committee (officers) of the corporation, consisting of a president, vice president, treasurer, secretary and three members-at-large. The president is the only officer who receives compensation.The balance of the committee is sitting gratis. Shares of stock cannot be resold, except back to the team for a fraction of the original price. Limited transfer of shares (ie., to heirs and relatives) is permissible.

Based on the original 'Articles of Incorporation for the (then) Green Bay Football Corporation' put into place in 1923, if the Packers franchise was sold, after the payment of all expenses, any remaining funds would go to the Sullivan-Wallen Post of the American Legion in order to build "a proper soldier's memorial." This stipulation was enacted to ensure that the club remained in Green Bay and that there could never be any financial enhancement for the shareholder. The beneficiary was changed from the Sullivan-Wallen Post to the Green Bay Packers Foundation on the basis of a shareholder vote at the November 1997 meeting.
 

chikenhawk

Hammerhead
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
475
Reaction score
3
Location
ipswich qld
ill buy shares just because there associated with the sharkies, i dont give a sh*t whether they provide me a positive investment in the future!

but seriously thats great news, despite living in qld all my life i do appreciate that we are the CRONULLA sharks and its great news to know we wont have to merge or relocate or even fold completely. (although moving to southeast queensland wuoldnt have been too bad!!! :nodlaugh)

cannot wait to 25 july...broncs v sharks at suncorp! bring it on
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,827
Reaction score
6,586
Location
IN A BAR
ill buy shares just because there associated with the sharkies, i dont give a ***** whether they provide me a positive investment in the future!

but seriously thats great news, despite living in qld all my life i do appreciate that we are the CRONULLA sharks and its great news to know we wont have to merge or relocate or even fold completely. (although moving to southeast queensland wuoldnt have been too bad!!! :nodlaugh)

cannot wait to 25 july...broncs v sharks at suncorp! bring it on
sorry mate, ive already shotgunned them to move over here
you have to get in quicker than that, maybe you could have st. george!?:D
 
Top