Round 8 2014: Cronulla Sharks v Penrith Panthers Saturday 26th April 3:00pm @ Remondis Stadium

Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Messages
17,982
Reaction score
206
I reckon Wade made sure he was noticed but you're right, the Penriff guy stopped in the line and you're not allowed to do that. I don't see what the big deal is about tbh.

Since they stuffed up by giving Foran a try I would expect most players to do the same and I don't blame them. How can anyone have any faith in the video refs this year? It's a joke.
Especially when Whare dropped the ball anyway.

Video ref has been piss poor the last couple of years.
 
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
28,406
Reaction score
761
Location
NSW
i cant believe Gould!

this is where the sport becomes a joke. the most opinionated prick in the sport is a commentator and a team boss.

his team loses from an illegal play. he should be tearing strips off the guy who ran the **** decoy, not bagging another bloke out.

the sooner gould kicks the bucket the better
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
14,837
Reaction score
3,381
Location
Perth WA
i cant believe Gould!

this is where the sport becomes a joke. the most opinionated prick in the sport is a commentator and a team boss.

his team loses from an illegal play. he should be tearing strips off the guy who ran the **** decoy, not bagging another bloke out.

the sooner gould kicks the bucket the better

He is still dirty that Wade left the pennies for us and that he couldn't steal him back is all.
 
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
28,406
Reaction score
761
Location
NSW
just takes the shine off a win.

even ikin who is a prick of a commentator said in the game its a blatant obstruction. wades actions bare not part of the ruling. he was impeded from a player standing in the defensive line. gould wanted clarity in a rule, it doesnt get clearer than that
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
14,837
Reaction score
3,381
Location
Perth WA
just takes the shine off a win.

even ikin who is a prick of a commentator said in the game its a blatant obstruction. wades actions bare not part of the ruling. he was impeded from a player standing in the defensive line. gould wanted clarity in a rule, it doesnt get clearer than that

Score card shows we beat the pennies and got to sing up up cronulla, So suck it up Gould!
 
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
28,406
Reaction score
761
Location
NSW
I don't think it does. Not one bit.

I think it does.

We won. We lost our key play maker. Gallen played hard. Few other blokes copped injuries throughout. We stuck solid and snuck home.

Then this butt hurt piece of **** needs to attack the player/video ref to make a point. It was one of the better games of the weekend, the lead switching a few times. But even the matty johns show wiped it to the last re-cap and only briefly spoke of the game. They had all the time in the world for gi or dce but the sharks win was non news
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Messages
17,982
Reaction score
206
i cant believe Gould!

this is where the sport becomes a joke. the most opinionated prick in the sport is a commentator and a team boss.

his team loses from an illegal play. he should be tearing strips off the guy who ran the **** decoy, not bagging another bloke out.

the sooner gould kicks the bucket the better

:borat:borat:borat:borat

Hate the prick.
 

sharkyboy

Jaws
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
15,273
Reaction score
105
Location
N.S.W
just takes the shine off a win.

even ikin who is a prick of a commentator said in the game its a blatant obstruction. wades actions bare not part of the ruling. he was impeded from a player standing in the defensive line. gould wanted clarity in a rule, it doesnt get clearer than that

I love Ikin. Knows his footy and tells it like it is no BS
 

Mr Wright

Jaws
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
12,573
Reaction score
97
Location
Sunshine Coast
I didnt like ikin as a commentator at all a few years ago. He seemed way to over the top with his bias towards queensland teams/big name sydney clubs.

Since he's moved to NRL 360 and commentstes on the side, he's become much more level headed imo.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Messages
17,982
Reaction score
206
Every commentator that's not from channel 9 > every channel 9 commentator.
 

Sixgill

Moderator
Joined
Mar 19, 2009
Messages
1,394
Reaction score
43
Location
Batemans Bay
Gould is arguing different things.

Wade is saying that Cleary wasn't on the field so he can't arguse whether Graham took a dive or not. Gould takes his quote and uses it out of context, arguing that this is the basis for whether it should have gone to the video ref.

I probably haven't explained it the best because Gould doesn't really deserve the time, but he has taken a quote from Graham about one thing and used it in an attempt to prove a completely different point.

Basic sensationalist journalism.
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
54,968
Reaction score
7,710
Location
Sydney
Gould is arguing different things.

Wade is saying that Cleary wasn't on the field so he can't arguse whether Graham took a dive or not. Gould takes his quote and uses it out of context, arguing that this is the basis for whether it should have gone to the video ref.

I probably haven't explained it the best because Gould doesn't really deserve the time, but he has taken a quote from Graham about one thing and used it in an attempt to prove a completely different point.

Basic sensationalist journalism.

I'm beginning to think you don't like Phillip, SixGill :p
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
12,087
Reaction score
61
wade took a dive but he was also impeded from having a fair shot on the ball runner, no try everyday.
 
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
28,406
Reaction score
761
Location
NSW
wade took a dive but he was also impeded from having a fair shot on the ball runner, no try everyday.

dive isnt really the word.

luke brooks' was a dive.

if brooks didnt hit the deck, it was a try, he wasnt impeded really, gower brushed the inside shoulder, brooks seemed to simultaneously get shot in the leg from a sniper in the crowd. he wasnt robbed of his chances greatly by gowers decoy run.

graham was sliding across field and a runner ran to his outside and stopped in his tracks. in that instance graham shouldnt have to make a decision to weave the guy.
 
Top