goodbyepenrithhellosharks
Great White
on a different note how sweet was that young girls voice who sang the anthems 10 out of 10
NRL Round 8, 2016: Cronulla Sutherland Sharks vs. Penrith Panthers, Sunday 24 April 4:00pm @ Southern Cross Group Stadium
- Thread starter HaroldBishop
- Start date
BlackWhiteBlue
Jaws
Nice one
vicsharkfan
Jaws
I thought we could have got a penalty on either or both vals or birds dodgy play the balls, they were getting man handled but both made sloppy efforts. We blow up when the bunker take forever, but then on chads no try we blow up cause it all happened to qik, did think he was offside even with shark glasses on, I just assumed it was a try cause they had a qik look and we're giving it the thumbs up.
If chad was offside so was moylan
sharks2010
Dribbler
yeah they didn't look at that one much did they. Did he get inside the 10. Haven't seen the replay of it yet
evertonshark
Jaws
Moylan wasn't offside, his run was timed absolutely perfect.
Not even 1 look. Cause that's all they need these days to conclusively overrule the on field ruling for offside. Any more looks than that is overkill let's hope they stay consistent with that this year. 1 look MAX per offside.
sharks2010
Dribbler
Does anyone have the stats for tackled in opposition 20?
Can never find them
Can never find them
HaroldBishop
Megalodon
Val's should have been a penalty, Bird's definitely not.
Was thinking the same. Apart from the first 10 minutes we had very little ball in good position.
Sutty
Jaws
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2014
- Messages
- 5,438
- Reaction score
- 370
Not sure. Closest thing I could find was on fox sports, had possession at 55% Panthers and "Territory" at 68% Panthers.
sharks2010
Dribbler
It's the one stat you can never find unless it's mentioned by fox during their coverage
vicsharkfan
Jaws
I just had a good 15min hunt around at a few stat sites couldn't find anything of note.
snowman
Total gronk
Moylan was offside, confirmed. But he wasnt within the 10 when Feki kicked it.
Learn the rules before whinging.
Learn the rules before whinging.
A l e x
Hammerhead
I'm still not convinced on the Townsend one unless you have the line thing in soccer you can't take one look especially when the ref had try and say yep offside, just take a look at the highlights and look at where Bird and Townsend are in relation to Lewis and Soward where the outstreched leg makes contact with the ball and tell me that's offside it's at worse even to me you need something that conclusively shows offside you usually need clear evidence to go against what the ref goes up as but i don't think the vision we get shows that.
The speed at which it happened just made me question what's going on it was already no try before there was a chance for the replay to even be shown :hissy
The speed at which it happened just made me question what's going on it was already no try before there was a chance for the replay to even be shown :hissy
sharks2010
Dribbler
Was clear as day townsend was offside
If that was called a try against us I'd go off deluxe
If that was called a try against us I'd go off deluxe
A l e x
Hammerhead
http://i.imgur.com/JJ4Dgei.jpg
For me his foot kicking it is ahead of Soward who is in turn ahead of Townsend, how is that clearly offside? That's is all the view the bunker had and it's enough to overule the onfield call? That is not conclusive evidence to me.
For me his foot kicking it is ahead of Soward who is in turn ahead of Townsend, how is that clearly offside? That's is all the view the bunker had and it's enough to overule the onfield call? That is not conclusive evidence to me.
sharks2010
Dribbler
towsends foot is in front of the ball for mine
Looking again at this its very hard to say he is 100% offside. It's marginal at best.
Well this is just the thing, some people say he's on some people say he's off so how is it 100% conclusive either way, especially enough to overturn the on field decision.