snowman
Total gronk
That ref yesterday was abysmal
I don't come cheap and the attitude is terrible - see below.
Crichton facing a two game suspension for a shoulder charge on Moylan in the first half. Remember it happening and Moylan blowing up.
No penalty to us
I didn't see that.
The DWZ one, no charge? I thought that was a blatant shoulder charge but the commentators didn't think so. Have they tweaked the shoulder charge rule again? I can't keep up.
I didn't see that.
The DWZ one, no charge? I thought that was a blatant shoulder charge but the commentators didn't think so. Have they tweaked the shoulder charge rule again? I can't keep up.
It looked to me that he wrapped around him with his other arm, I’ll probably have to see it again to be sure.
It looked to me that he wrapped around him with his other arm, I’ll probably have to see it again to be sure.
He wrapped an arm enough, good hit
The DWZ one was a brilliant crushing tackle, all arms and totally legal.
I know it was against one of our boys but it was bloody good.
I thought wakeham got put on report for the hit on Dugan? He's not on the list of players charged this week. I thought that was pretty unnecessary to do that, he was just about tackled tbh.
I thought wakeham got put on report for the hit on Dugan? He's not on the list of players charged this week. I thought that was pretty unnecessary to do that, he was just about tackled tbh.
Report doesn't mean you'll get charged, just ensures it is looked at and also makes some other allowances like free interchange.
Wasn't worth charging as dangerous contact, penalty sufficient. Thought maybe a shoulder charge though
That and he has to play for the Bulldogs!The review panel may have also accepted 10 mins in the bin as sufficient punishment for his actions.
i dont remember the shot from chrighton on moylan?
The review panel may have also accepted 10 mins in the bin as sufficient punishment for his actions.
http://bit.ly/3fNRe3g
hope this link works for you; on foxsports.com
nothing in it but technically no arms in the tackle
That would be a weird outcome
He got 10 minutes for repeat infringements by his team, not for the infringement itself.
Typically you get 10 minutes for professional fouls, repeat infringements, or really bad ****.
If dangerous contact is sufficient enough to warrant 10 minutes then I would expect it typically be charged, he hasn't been charged so I assume they didn't think the dangerous contact warranted more than a penalty.
I would have thought dangerous contact deserving of 10 minutes is going to be deserving of a charge.
settling dud predictionDogs by 6
So a large bag of twistees instead of a small then?
Not necessarily a season changing turnaround or anything but **** 11th, one win outside the 8, looks a lot nicer than 15th
Nothing wrong with DWZ's shot on Moylan, that was a great hit to watch & couldn't believe Moylan got up straight away & kept held of the ball! He apologised to Moylan after the game apparently.
That and he has to play for the Bulldogs!
It’s the NRL review panel.
There is nothing logical about any of their decisions!