Kangaroos vs Wallabies

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,280
Reaction score
6,134
Location
IN A BAR
ARL, ARU in talks for a hyrbrid contest between Wallabies-Kangaroos

By Paul Kent
November 24, 2008

SECRET negotiations are taking place to secure an historic Kangaroos versus Wallabies match next October at ANZ Stadium is Sydney.

The game has already been booked for ANZ, where officials have labelled it the biggest event since the Sydney Olympics in 2000.

The negotiations are in their infancy and their eventual success ultimately will depend on the delicate relationship between the Australian Rugby Union and the Australian Rugby League.

However the first dramatic chink in the seemingly impenetrable barrier that has separated the codes for 100 years has been made.

The prospect of watching Matt Giteau taking on Darren Lockyer, Stirling Mortlock against Greg Inglis and the like would cause unprecedented interest among Australian sports fans.

The blockbuster will generate an estimated $15million, while promoters have promised $2million to a children's hospital.

ARL chairman Colin Love has agreed, in principle, to the game -- supporting an idea that benefits children's charities.

Australian Rugby Union chairman Peter McGrath was told about the bold proposal yesterday and preferred to speak to chief executive John O'Neill before commenting.

There are many reasons why a hybrid match between rugby union's Wallabies and rugby league's Kangaroos will not go ahead - but one overwhelming reason why it should.

The fans want it.

Promoter Phil Franks has promised to work closely with both the Australian Rugby Union and Australian Rugby League in order to ensure the game goes ahead.

Franks intends to formally approach ARU chief executive John O'Neill and ARL counterpart Geoff Carr this week.

"I didn't want to speak to them until they got a taste of the enormity and benefit of it," he said.

"John O'Neill is the sort of man that can make this happen because he is a business genius."

For 100 years football fans have argued about the respective merits of league versus union - who would win and why - and now they appear set to get their answer.

Some of the biggest names from each code, including former Wallabies coach Bob Dwyer and former Kangaroos coach Bob Fulton, support the hybrid match.

"There's a lot of reasons for playing it," Dwyer said.

"One of the important reasons is, if we are in the entertainment industry and those people that we are trying to attract want to see it - and it does seem like the people we're trying to attract do want to see it - then isn't that what we're here for?"

Until now, any attempt to decide the best footballers between the codes has been unsatisfactory. Generally played under home team rules, the result has often ended wildly in favour of the home team.

But Franks, a property developer who played league for Norths, Balmain and Penrith, believes he has the key, and after booking ANZ Stadium for the game last week he patented "Hybrid Twelve" on Friday.

He is also close to signing an underwriter for a multi-million- dollar deal.

The success of the match will depend on establishing rules that ultimately decide the best football team and not which team is best advantaged by the rule interpretations. Dwyer and Fulton will be part of the rules committee charged with finding rules that suit both codes equally.

Another high-profile rugby expert has also committed, while it is planned that other experts will also be invited.

"It will be an absolutely outstanding promotion and, just being a football fan, I'd love to see it," Fulton said.

"And I'm sure there's plenty of other people that, as long as the t's are crossed and the i's dotted in relation to getting it together, would love to see it also.

"The players from both codes would also love to be involved in a game of this stature."

While both codes will undoubtedly have their prejudices about pushing forward with the game, the money involved might make it impossible to ignore.

Both the codes are currently exploring new ways to supplement their income.

The recent world economic downturn has also bitten hard, with rugby sponsorships dropping by more than $1million among some Australian provinces.

The ARU also has several "black holes" in next year's schedule brought about by the British and Irish Lions tour to South Africa. Because the Lions are touring, the British nations - Scotland, Wales and England, as well as Ireland - will not be touring individually, ruling out any tours to Australia.

The "Hybrid Twelve" would sell out ANZ Stadium, drawing a gate upwards of $8million with local and international television rights on top of that.

Still, for all the financial benefits Franks knows a lot must happen before contracts are signed.

ARL chairman Colin Love supports the hybrid match in principle, while ARU chairman Peter McGrath will speak to O'Neill about it this week after being told about it on Sunday.

Another obstacle for the ARU is that it would have to receive IRB approval.

"I want both of these parties to embrace it and get the politics out of it so they will see the benefits to their codes," Franks said.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
personally id like to see it. best rules i can figure is union line ups, lineouts and scrums with league play the ball and tackle count
 

peachey

One of a kind
Joined
Sep 7, 2005
Messages
15,219
Reaction score
125
Location
Welcome to Emu Plains, please be sure to visit our
surprise surprise, union say no..cause they know we would kill them unless you put our forwards in a scrum with them, they would literally flatten our forwards

medicab would work overtime taking blokes like dunning off the field due to loss of breath if they had to keep up with our backline
 

brad

Great White
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
3,590
Reaction score
16
Location
nsw north coast
wow. wasnt expecting to hear an idea like this pop up. i reckon it would be great. finally proving that leagies are much better athletes than rugby boys
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,280
Reaction score
6,134
Location
IN A BAR
rucks and the wallabies would destroy the kangaroos. play the ball with unlimited tackles and roos would flog them. with a bit of practice roos could pull a decent lineout and probably an alright scrum (less weight, more muscle/explosive power). roos superior tackling (situation and including shoulders) would win it for them if the rules were as i suggested imo
 

footyfortress

Bronze Whaler
Joined
Nov 22, 2007
Messages
184
Reaction score
0
Location
Camden
I honestly think ( NO BIASS ) that the Kangaroos would dominate the Wallabies.

Attacking plays in union are soo poor. They have the whole field to work with and can still not structure a play. Thats why they always kick field goals and penalty goals....

Our forwards would run over theres.

Would love to see the hybrid game (Promotion only tho)..

Kimmorley was on Fox Sports News this morning saying he'd love it. But Wallabies were strongly against it.
 

sandman77

Banned
Joined
May 12, 2008
Messages
2,266
Reaction score
11
Location
Coffs Harbour
I honestly think ( NO BIASS ) that the Kangaroos would dominate the Wallabies.

Attacking plays in union are soo poor. They have the whole field to work with and can still not structure a play. Thats why they always kick field goals and penalty goals....

Our forwards would run over theres.

Would love to see the hybrid game (Promotion only tho)..

Kimmorley was on Fox Sports News this morning saying he'd love it. But Wallabies were strongly against it.

I tend to agree with you, In my opinion the Roos would be a little to classy and swift for the Yawnion boys.

It makes sence the Wallabies are against it,

It would be destroy them to be beat by the League Boys.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
10,213
Reaction score
795
Location
Gods Country - Shire - Cronulla
I think they did a similar thing a while back in england. I think it was Wigan V Bath from memory. They played 2 games. One Union rules one league. Wigan lost by a couple of points in Union and killed em by 60 odd in league. I think Wigan had a few ex Union boys which may have helped...
No idea who would win a hybrid game until the rules are laid out. We would be in big strife if they allow rucks and mauls because you really need to know the rules in that mess. Also we would probably lose the scrums cause basically we dont have them anymore. But in back line attack we would smash them from pillar to post. Especially as Union backs arent used to doing a little thing called "tackling". And if it came down to penalties. Well i think we may be in trouble there also.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,280
Reaction score
6,134
Location
IN A BAR
I honestly think ( NO BIASS ) that the Kangaroos would dominate the Wallabies.

Attacking plays in union are soo poor. They have the whole field to work with and can still not structure a play. Thats why they always kick field goals and penalty goals....

Our forwards would run over theres.

Would love to see the hybrid game (Promotion only tho)..

Kimmorley was on Fox Sports News this morning saying he'd love it. But Wallabies were strongly against it.
slow down there buddy you cant say that until you know the rules. and to say they have the whole field to work with in union is a big call too, they have more players on the field than us and its hard enough to create an overlap in league. in a running game our forwards would dominate theirs. imagine dunning making 20 hit ups and 15 tackles.
I think they did a similar thing a while back in england. I think it was Wigan V Bath from memory. They played 2 games. One Union rules one league. Wigan lost by a couple of points in Union and killed em by 60 odd in league. I think Wigan had a few ex Union boys which may have helped...
No idea who would win a hybrid game until the rules are laid out. We would be in big strife if they allow rucks and mauls because you really need to know the rules in that mess. Also we would probably lose the scrums cause basically we dont have them anymore. But in back line attack we would smash them from pillar to post. Especially as Union backs arent used to doing a little thing called "tackling". And if it came down to penalties. Well i think we may be in trouble there also.
i think maybe its was leeds or wigan kept entering a rugby7s comp and won it a few times as well.
depends entirely on the rules who would win. more technical aspects of union incorporated = union winning, more running and tackling* of league incorporated = league winning.

*in union the person being tackled has a desire to fall down as soon as contact is made. in league they want to stay up and keep going, and also shoulder charges are legal and theres less players to make tackles thus players get more practice
 

Capital_Shark

Kitty Master
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
17,766
Reaction score
2,433
Its a horrible idea and one that I hope dies a quick and silent death.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,280
Reaction score
6,134
Location
IN A BAR
Hybrid game no case of flogging a dead donkey

"WHAT do you get when you cross a thoroughbred with a donkey," Titans chairman Paul Broughton asked yesterday regarding the possibility of the Kangaroos and the Wallabies playing a hybrid match in October.

"Answer: A sterile mule."

The entrenched view that one code would be diminished by merging with the other, possibly killing both, will render an exhibition game difficult to stage.

It was raised at an official level early this year. ARU boss John O'Neill floated the idea of a game between the Kangaroos and Wallabies to celebrate rugby league's centenary year.

"Our rules in the first half, yours in the second," O'Neill told me, with the brief to mention it to the ARL/NRL hierarchy.

The response from ARL chief executive Geoff Carr and NRL boss David Gallop was immediate: "Why should we hitch ourselves to rugby union when we're going OK and they are not?"

This was a few months after the Wallabies had bombed out ignominiously in a quarter-final of the Rugby World Cup and new coach Robbie Deans had only recently assembled his squad. Now, the boot has shifted to the other foot. The Wallabies have beaten Italy, England and France away in successive games and the Kangaroos have lost the final of league's World Cup to New Zealand.

But O'Neill's initial zeal was short-lived anyway. He sent a text message to abort the mission, later explaining: "I raised the idea with a couple of ARU directors and they weren't enthusiastic."

The ARU released a statement yesterday distancing itself from promoter Phil Franks's project and it would seem the ARL is as dismissive now as it was months ago.

When Franks phoned ARL chairman Colin Love recently to explore the exhibition game idea, he was referred to Carr.

Franks has subsequently made a booking at ANZ stadium for every weekend next October, convinced that momentum will stampede the bosses of the two sports into a match, with $2 million being donated.

He has the support of two World Cup-winning coaches - Bob Fulton, who coached the Kangaroos to win the 1995 cup, and Bob Dwyer, who led the Wallabies to the cup in 1991. Each sees merit in the other's game and inadequacies in his own.

Fulton initiated league's 40:20 rule that offers the chance to break the game's boring convention of each team having the ball for six tackles. He played union for Combined Services while in the Army. Dwyer has watched rugby league for years, often expressing admiration for the skills of forwards such as Arthur Beetson.
A great proponent of advantage-line passing, he advocates any rule change that results in union forwards being creative with the ball in hand.

While Franks has registered a set of hybrid rules that might be nothing more than the Kangaroos playing rugby union when they cross the halfway line into the Wallabies territory and vice versa, the possibility of an official merged game will excite the philosophers.

Nothing is more guaranteed to generate interest in fans than drawing up new rules on a blank sheet of butcher's paper. Franks calculates fan momentum will empower him to approach underwriters for the event and embarrass officials into approving it. The support of News Ltd will be critical. The media company owns the SANZAR television contract, half-owns the NRL and is a 50 per cent owner of Fox Sports, which screens Super 14 and five NRL game a week.

Perhaps a hybrid game falls outside the conditions of an existing broadcasting contract and if so would be a bonanza to a promoter who succeeds in attracting a free-to-air network.

The Kangaroos are scheduled to play in the Four Nations tournament in the UK at the end of next year but the Wallabies have shown they are willing to chase big purses by playing in Hong Kong.

Officials might consider it an ass of an idea but what's the alternative? One code waiting for the other to die? Both games are a chance of expiring in a world where every other team sport allows a forward pass.

Franks's game might not happen in Sydney in October but one day it will.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
they are? enland, ireland, scottland i guess?
 

Capital_Shark

Kitty Master
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
17,766
Reaction score
2,433
Both games are a chance of expiring in a world where every other team sport allows a forward pass.

Boxing and poker will go first, they don't even use a ball!
 

Bungy

Bull Shark
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
3,641
Reaction score
18
Location
Giddy Up
there's a lot of decisions to be made on rules, I think field goals and all goals should be 2 points, meat pies 5 maybe
 

The Celt

Bronze Whaler
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Location
Warilla
It will never happen. Main reason is that both organisations have too much to lose if their team loses the match. How would the rules go. Rucks and mauls or play the balls. Play the ball you have to be back 10 metres, R&M behind the last foot in the R&M. That closes play down considerably but the union forwards would have trouble back pedalling the 10 metres. Scrums? The rugby forwards would go for a pushover try evry scrum within 40 metres of the line.

Defence, not as good as a good league team, but they would hold their own with Giteau, Mortlock, Cross, Barnes, Hynes and Burgess, not forgetting Waugh and Palu in the forwards.
 

Google News

Newsbot
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
79,399
Reaction score
34
Parra set sleuth hunting for rorts - Sydney Morning Herald

Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=...x.html&usg=AFQjCNGqxCx7svbA_3jYKZ9W9TYW-skwQw

Parra set sleuth hunting for rorts

JOSH RAKIC AND ADRIAN PROSZENKO
May 30, 2010

<EDITED>

HYBRID GAME DEALS DRAWN UP

PLANS to stage a hybrid match between the Wallabies and Kangaroos have progressed despite the reservations of the NRL and ARU. The consortium behind it has recruited rugby legend Mark Ella as an adviser. There have also been early talks with state officials about using ANZ Stadium. Multimillion-dollar contracts are being drafted and will be presented to the games' governing bodies this week.

<EDITED>
 
Top