Is this an option?
- Thread starter bluey
- Start date
CrazyMatt
Jaws
Possible but unlikely. He probably wouldn't want us anyway. Besides the NRL has a sour taste in their mouth regarding private ownerships at the moment because of what's happened at Newcastle
snowman
Total gronk
i doubt it, this is the same guy who rejected the chance of flanno working for him this season due to a bad reference
i doubt he would want to own a club run by the same muppet
i doubt he would want to own a club run by the same muppet
I thought he was already in talks with Newcastle? looking at the Zero tackle site. after reading through some of the other posts I wouldn't mind giving that Marldon ******w*t an upper cut!!!!
CrazyMatt
Jaws
SF
Mako Shark
Sounds like Nathan Tinkler's brother-from-another-mother to me.
There's not much out there to indicate he's a true billionaire.
There's not much out there to indicate he's a true billionaire.
vicsharkfan
Jaws
I think plenty of things have been learnt from tinkle and newy... Without thinking too much about it I'd rekon if the NRL had our back and there was 12-15 mil sitting in the NRLs bank account prior to any take over with our name on it if anything went pear shape.. Maybe... A tycoon having plenty of coin spending it on us and our facilities... I'd imagine is better than any past current or future board members swanning around and racking up major debts with no accountability then getting voted out..
HaroldBishop
Megalodon
I still don't get why people our angry about this.
bluey
Bull Shark
Word Nazis are back
BlackWhiteBlue
Jaws
Agree. Was a good call in ways.
Capital_Shark
Kitty Master
- Joined
- May 7, 2006
- Messages
- 17,762
- Reaction score
- 2,430
With the current 3 law suits against us and the strong likelihood of more to come I doubt we're a very attractive investment opportunity.
But the 'a option'.
skeksis
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2013
- Messages
- 1,883
- Reaction score
- 28
You're not annoyed that the club failed to consult with its paying members on a financial matter as important as who controls our loan, and the consequences if we are unable to make repayments? I get it, you guys are ****ty at 99% of the decisions our board makes and casually gloss over a few issues here and there. If our board and team aren't consistent, why should the fanbase be, right?
Did I miss something? I must be the only one out of the loop here.
Did I miss something? I must be the only one out of the loop here.
sharks2010
Dribbler
im with you on this one bud, and if I recall there were plenty others who were no happy with this either, it's the first time I can actually recall anyone actually saying they were fine with it
snowman
Total gronk
yeh i remember there being a big hoo-ha about it, i was and still am pissed off about it
skeksis
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2013
- Messages
- 1,883
- Reaction score
- 28
Of all the things the board has done this year, doing this without consulting members and offering supercoach a new 3 year deal rank up there as the most dubious, right?
Like you and 2010 I'm pretty sure people were ****ing furious, and like 2010 I'm confused as to why suddenly it's a non-issue?
sharks2010
Dribbler
guess it shows how little they value their members, another case that happened there Sunday after the game in the leagues club is a perfect example
probably because it hasn't turned around and bit us on the arse, yet...