sharkstragic
Jaws
Why couldn’t manly had this game against us
Because we could not do to them what the Panthers didWhy couldn’t manly had this game against us
It’s funny how referees no longer send anyone off or to the sin bin any more.
It’s the bunker that does it.
If your a ref though why put that decision on your self and risk it being wrong knowing that the bunker is going to review and make a decision on it regardless.
Better to do nothing and risk missing an incident vs getting a call wrong that swings the match and might get you dropped
Refs have a tough job having to make instant decisions on the fly why running round for 80 mins under fatigue. What I struggle to cop is the video refs ballsing up a decision though
Any game where Manly lose is a good game.That game was filth
Agreed, no way he wanted to land it thereCommentators/media are going on about Garrick trying to start an old school kicking duel. Seemed pretty obvious watching that it was a set move to kick for Saab and/or a 20-40 but he shanked it straight down the middle instead of wide to the right where he wanted it to go.
TouchéAny game where Manly lose is a good game.
Commentators/media are going on about Garrick trying to start an old school kicking duel. Seemed pretty obvious watching that it was a set move to kick for Saab and/or a 20-40 but he shanked it straight down the middle instead of wide to the right where he wanted it to go.
I thought it was obvious live too. Even had to try explain it to most my friends watching it.Commentators/media are going on about Garrick trying to start an old school kicking duel. Seemed pretty obvious watching that it was a set move to kick for Saab and/or a 20-40 but he shanked it straight down the middle instead of wide to the right where he wanted it to go.
Seen a quote from Seibs that his game plan was try different things because that’s the only way teams will beat Penrith, and I think he’s right.Curious to hear your perspective of that as a strategy Burgo as someone with a coach's mindset.
Very high-risk, high-reward but with other team focusing on kick chase seems your likelihood of getting the ball to touch would be higher, granted you don't shank it.
Suppose most fullback aren't really known for their long kicking game though.
Yep if you just let them play their game they will grind you away. Need to take some risks to get them on the back foot - but if you don’t execute you need to be very ready to defend as they will come back at you hard every time you make even a small mistakeSeen a quote from Seibs that his game plan was try different things because that’s the only way teams will beat Penrith, and I think he’s right.
It obviously back fired very badly and could argue it cost them the game. But do Penrith come over the top of Manly late regardless? Probably yes.
Yeah as you said above. Landing a 20/40, then perhaps scoring off it now puts Manly in a position to actually beat them.Yep if you just let them play their game they will grind you away. Need to take some risks to get them on the back foot - but if you don’t execute you need to be very ready to defend as they will come back at you hard every time you make even a small mistake
Yeah that's fair.Seen a quote from Seibs that his game plan was try different things because that’s the only way teams will beat Penrith, and I think he’s right.
It obviously back fired very badly and could argue it cost them the game. But do Penrith come over the top of Manly late regardless? Probably yes.
The only time teams have had success against Penrith seems to be when they've pushed the ball around. The problem is most teams feel apart in their completion rates with that style.Yeah as you said above. Landing a 20/40, then perhaps scoring off it now puts Manly in a position to actually beat them.
I think other teams will take a leaf out of that game when they play Penrith next. Not so much the 20/40 but shifting it early in their own half did look promising for Manly