Financial Support for the Club- Fundraising Structure and/or 3rd Party Sponsorship *Poll Added*

Would you be willing to contribute to a fund for third party sponsorship of a Sharks player in the f

  • Not interested

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, up to $52/year ($1/week)

    Votes: 8 10.5%
  • Yes, up to $104/year ($2/week)

    Votes: 10 13.2%
  • Yes, up to $262/year ($5/week)

    Votes: 12 15.8%
  • Yes, up to $520/year ($10/week)

    Votes: 18 23.7%
  • Yes, for more than $520/year ($10+/week)

    Votes: 6 7.9%
  • I would be happy to make a one off contribution

    Votes: 12 15.8%
  • Not sure- I would need more information

    Votes: 10 13.2%

  • Total voters
    76
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
5,963
Reaction score
64
Location
Brisbane
someone get in touch with el coco... get the ball rolling, make it happen for 2012

Good luck I couldn't even get in touch with him for that Skim Board I set aside $400 for he cant even do me the respect of msg'ing me and telling me what's going on with it, I guess I am just a QLD member we dont really matter.

But otherwise I think the shares idea is a good idea somthing along those lines a sharks Trust maybe?
 

Fitzy2513

Oceanic Whitetip Shark
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
982
Reaction score
14
Location
The Luke Massey Hill
Guys, we only got about $1600 from the HPU donations, some of that was due to B&B challenge to others of matching donations. It's all about numbers and I don't know if we have those numbers.
 

Mark^Bastard

Great White
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
17,725
Reaction score
167
Location
Brisbane
Guys, we only got about $1600 from the HPU donations, some of that was due to B&B challenge to others of matching donations. It's all about numbers and I don't know if we have those numbers.

I understand 100%, however I see that $1600 as a reason why we can achieve this.

For starters, the $1600 was for some jackets that players use on hot days when they're on the bench. I'm sure a lot of people thought it was a good idea, but thought it's just a little thing probably won't make a massive difference.

However, if you can put $2 a week away to have your team become glamour and retain Snowden and also recruit another marquee player, that's not really a hard sell to a real fan at all. They'd just want some kind of guarantee that it's going to work.

The logistics are hard, but I don't think the concept is hard.
 

ben

Great White
Joined
Mar 13, 2009
Messages
3,366
Reaction score
189
Location
lismore
People woul become members to do this - I think its great idea. We can all be tinklers!!!!
 

Nicholas2230

Tiger Shark
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
1,098
Reaction score
54
Location
Brisbane
The logistics aren't hard at all, set up a company under the name of The Believers PTY limited for example....register the directors as the people who are wanting to run the logistics, collection of money, promotion etc... Contact the club and advise we would like to become a third party sponsor. Get a plan in action, collect the monies. I think the hardest part is the collection of the money ie getting people to part with it

My father owns a record company that could be the sponsor I guess but it depends on how to get the money into the account and the promo as well as how would the stakes held by people donating money.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
12,087
Reaction score
61
sounds great especially the 100 bucks a year (which would be easily beaten by most members on here
 

The Shire

Grey Nurse
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
718
Reaction score
7
Location
Upper ET
I understand 100%, however I see that $1600 as a reason why we can achieve this.

For starters, the $1600 was for some jackets that players use on hot days when they're on the bench. I'm sure a lot of people thought it was a good idea, but thought it's just a little thing probably won't make a massive difference.

However, if you can put $2 a week away to have your team become glamour and retain Snowden and also recruit another marquee player, that's not really a hard sell to a real fan at all. They'd just want some kind of guarantee that it's going to work.

The logistics are hard, but I don't think the concept is hard.

yeah i agree. jackets and small things like that are great but ensuring the clubs survival is another. lets do it guys Believers pty sounds great nick
 

fitz

-------------
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
8,229
Reaction score
163
Location
Shire
There is already a business entity in place that runs this website and the various BELIEVE initiatives.

It is a Not For Profit Incorporated Association registered with the NSW Department of Fair Trading.
 

The Shire

Grey Nurse
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
718
Reaction score
7
Location
Upper ET
There is already a business entity in place that runs this website and the various BELIEVE initiatives.

It is a Not For Profit Incorporated Association registered with the NSW Department of Fair Trading.

in regards to the nrl and third party deals would there be a conflict?

surely not.

I really like the debt demolition idea adopted by the melb demons. is that something that could be organised through the club im sure that the club could wipe off thousands through this. reminds me of that la-0dy at the vote who was almost crying
 

Lumpy

Bull Shark
Joined
Aug 24, 2009
Messages
2,301
Reaction score
35
Location
The Shire
There is already a business entity in place that runs this website and the various BELIEVE initiatives.

It is a Not For Profit Incorporated Association registered with the NSW Department of Fair Trading.

Then lets get it done with that set up then.

We need a board of directors and a chairman. We will also need some sort of constitution about how the thing will be run, terms of office, what the money is spent on ect. Any money spent on players should be put to a vote by the members. There has to be tight controls around what the money can be used for.

The Broncos have a group of business people called the "Clydesdales" we could be know as the "Great Whites"
 

gosharkies

Bull Shark
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
1,936
Reaction score
9
great post, i would definately invest in the sharks. i think most shark fans would particulary if any cash invested was to be used to pay down debt & help make us more competive.
why not have say 13 million 1 dollar shares with all money raised to pay off debt, so that the leagues can increase grants to the football without concern of restrictions from bank. if this idea was used all fans could invest, & continue to invest. maybe incentives like share holder only functions with players, maybe shareholders jersey available to buy, maybe thankyou letter of support letter similar to the et signed letter with wall of support.
maybe different levels of share ownership gives different privillages for the owner, for example buy atleast 100 shares @ $1 each & you can buy a shareholders jersey.
50 shares @ $1 each free poster
250 shares thankyou letter signed by gallen
1000 shares free signed framed picture of favourite player share holders edition
5000 shares free signed team picture share holders edition

Wow, I just realised something.

I reckon the average adult full time worker probably gets around 5 grand in super per year.

If we could get 5,000 people to put in 5 grand of their super, that is 25 million dollars.

I would put in 5 grand of my super, especially if I knew 4,999 others would do the same. 25 million would be absolutely massive for the club.

Or how about this, 5,000 Sharks fans put in $100 each per year as a 3rd party sponsor, giving us $500,000.00 to spend on player 3rd party payments. That's heaps of money about the cap, should be enough to get two marquee players (250k by the club 250k by us). $100 a year to make the club glamour is nothing. $2 a week. Surely 5,000 fans would be up for that?

Man, we really need to get organised. PROPER organised, and do this ****.

i be in that

Fair enough. However I consider it a bit of a different proposition. For example let's look at the $60 net membership.

$60 buys you a scarf, a keyring, a sticker, and the knowledge that you're supporting the Sharks with a bit of money, presumably this money is important to the Sharks but who knows specifically what it's used for.

$100 buys you the knowledge that the Sharks say retain Snowden and buy Idris. Your $100 allows the club to actually REALLY compete for players.

I know which one I consider better value for money.

i be prepared to spend more than $100 a year if meant keeping snowden & signing idris
 

ABshark

Vapid
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
7,870
Reaction score
116
Location
NSW
Thanks for your responses guys! I’m really glad to see that I’m not the only one interested in where this kind of thinking could take us.

It seems to me that we’ve kind of diverged in to two ideas at the moment- one about a possible supporter led purchase of the Football Club, and another about setting up some sort of fund that would directly aid the Club in its endeavours.

So, with that in mind:

----------------------------

Sharks Fans as potential sponsors

Though it wasn't really what I was expected, I think it’s a great idea and one that gets to the heart of what we are talking about- that is, a greater degree of formal, financial contribution and control by the supporters of the Sharks over the CSDRLFC. A third party sponsorship certainly would be a massive step in that direction. Also such a fund may be the starting point for something much larger, such as a move to purchase the Club.

In terms of benefits, I can see them being almost limitless… along with the benefit of keeping a player at the Club or getting one here you would be able to ask that player (who would probably have quite a high profile) to do extra charity events in the Shire such as becoming the Shire ‘Sports Ambassador’ and rocking up to junior sports events and the like, especially those of the junior RL.

However I think the first question that would have to be asked is whether such an entity would be able to get involved. As far as I understand it (from this source here) there are two 'types' of third party sponsorship. One is sponsorship that is covered by the 'marquee player allowance' which allows up to $300k per year of non-Club money to be paid to any one player or $300k per year to be divided amongst any number of players in order for that player or players to play for a certain Club.

The second type of third party payments are those which are not dependent on what club the player plays for and do not involve the Club in any negotiations. For instance, a player may be used in advertising for ANZ Stadium, may do endorsements or appear at various corporate events and be paid for that. These are the ones where the player's manager is the one that does all the work. (Just as an aside, I'm guessing that this is where most of the player managers actually earn their big biscuits.)

So its likely that any potential 'Sharks Forever' third party payment would have to fall under the 'marquee allowance'. The question is- has the Club already got enough sponsors to fill that initial $300k? Or is it an area where we lag behind the big Clubs? Ho can we find out?

That is my (limited) understanding, but I'm sure there are other ways in which the Thoroughbreds and so on go about their business and get money to players. Also, there may be some way that we could have our potential payment included under the non-marquee allowance, but we certainly would need some advice from someone who really knows what’s going on.

So that’s the first issue. The second is the business structure we could use to make that sort of idea a reality.

Another thing that piqued my interest when I was doing a little research was the advent of ‘Supporters Trusts’ in the UK. These Trusts developed originally in an effort to save financially struggling Football (soccer) Clubs but have now developed (with government assistance) in to ways of counteracting the growing influence of soccer magnates and protecting fans’ rights. They are run as non-profit, fan owned, democratic trust funds which aim to give fans of clubs more of a say in the future of their teams and the UK government now supports them with investment expertise through this organisation here which also has some great details on what they are and how they do what they do. The Wikipedia entry is also helpful!

And interestingly, recently funds have arisen to help Rugby League and Rugby Union clubs.

Legally, such trusts take the form of 'Industrial and Provident Societies' in the UK. Unfortunately, these don't exist under Australian law as far as I know. I suspect the closest thing in Australian terms is a ‘private company limited by guarantee’ such as the Football Club is now.

Thus far I know very little about Trust funds, but they may be an option too.

There is already a business entity in place that runs this website and the various BELIEVE initiatives.

It is a Not For Profit Incorporated Association registered with the NSW Department of Fair Trading.

I kind of suspected as much fitz! So far from what I’ve read, this would be the other obvious path for us to go down. Though would that arrangement be suitable for what we’re talking about here? Especially given the kind of sums that are being thrown around and the definite need for total transparency and accountability?

Regardless, any such entity would have to ensure that it is considered a ‘not-for-profit’ by the government and hence was tax free.

---------------------

Ownership of the Club

Moved here


------------------------------

Apart from the interesting business modelling, something that immediately sprung to my mind is the opportunity to set up sister-club arrangements with professional sports organisations across the world. Obviously, there is a lot that we can learn from how others do things.

Don't get me started mate... Tinkler's best idea is to get all of the Newcastle region's sporting entities working together. I would love to see the Sutherland Shire Netball Association, Sutherland CC, the Sutherland Shire Football Association, Shire Baseball, the various surf-clubs and so on all as part owners of our Football Club. The Sharks ought to be seen and used as the flagship for the Shire and Shire sport, nationally and internationally.

I really like the debt demolition idea adopted by the melb demons. is that something that could be organised through the club im sure that the club could wipe off thousands through this. reminds me of that la-0dy at the vote who was almost crying

That is a very good point mate, I hadn't thought of that. We should look in to what they did and how.
:good:
 

fitz

-------------
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
8,229
Reaction score
163
Location
Shire
AB,

I have been advocating for quite some time the co-branding of many sports under the Sharks umbrella.

There could be some incredible synergies, efficiencies and promotional opportunities available in such a move.

CSCSC
Cronulla Sutherland Combined Sports Club

I can also see it not only operating as a combination of sports clubs but also their licensed Clubs as well. Sharkies Bowling Club, Sharkies Sailing Club, Sharkies Surf Club etc.,

I know there is the whole talks about merging of the Licensed Club with another Club - much like the Tradies merger - perhaps there may be an opportunity to not just look at one big partner but many smaller Clubs.

Anyway, it's just a thought and now the reason for me being awake at this unholy hour is snoring away, I'm going back to bed!
 

slide rule

Jaws
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
20,486
Reaction score
467
Location
General Admission
AB,

I have been advocating for quite some time the co-branding of many sports under the Sharks umbrella.

There could be some incredible synergies, efficiencies and promotional opportunities available in such a move.

CSCSC
Cronulla Sutherland Combined Sports Club

I can also see it not only operating as a combination of sports clubs but also their licensed Clubs as well. Sharkies Bowling Club, Sharkies Sailing Club, Sharkies Surf Club etc.,

I know there is the whole talks about merging of the Licensed Club with another Club - much like the Tradies merger - perhaps there may be an opportunity to not just look at one big partner but many smaller Clubs.

Anyway, it's just a thought and now the reason for me being awake at this unholy hour is snoring away, I'm going back to bed!

Totally agree. I've been thinking this for a long time. I reckon it would really help to shore up support from people on the fringes who don't actively support the Sharks but are involved in one of those other clubs. Particularly people who are not originally from the area.
 

kiwishark

Bull Shark
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Messages
1,606
Reaction score
6
I would be up for this Mark.

I also suggested last year the $10 a week to the club for 3rd party sponsor ship. $520 a year, x 5000 people... do the math!

Love both ideas like I said the super one for me is great take my 35k now it's in OZ doing nothing.

Also this idea of yours Snow is awesome!!! I currently pay $40 a week into various clubs for drinking purposes and would scrap 1 or 2 of these to donate towards your idea.... as a contributer all I would want in return is some meet and greet with players, pics etc
 

Mark^Bastard

Great White
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
17,725
Reaction score
167
Location
Brisbane
AB, to be honest I'm not interested in buying the club. From what I understand at the moment the club is sort of owned by the members anyway.

However, I'm interested in being a co-operative 3rd party sponsor.

What you have posted is absolutely correct, however Tinkler will be using his mining contacts to give Snowden 3rd party deals that don't come under the marquee allowance. Brisbane also do this, Lockyer is on 250k a season in the cap. It's not in the spirit of the game and yes it is cheating but others are doing it already. There is no reason why our payments couldn't be genuine 3rd party ones.
 

kiwishark

Bull Shark
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Messages
1,606
Reaction score
6
I'm in Mark can we really try set this up??? maybe Damian Irvine could help us with it???
 

Mark^Bastard

Great White
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
17,725
Reaction score
167
Location
Brisbane
The 3rd party sponsor angle can't have anything to do with the Sharks, at least officially.
 

kiwishark

Bull Shark
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Messages
1,606
Reaction score
6
Maybe we start a club called the Great Whites as mentioned before (like the CSSC) it costs $520 per year to be a member or $10 per week, money is used as 3rd party sponsorship towards players and other things as they come round like the HPU for example.

A board would deal with the club and take options to the members to vote on the allocation of funds!
 
Top