After having read the NRL list of top 100 players over the last century, I, just as many of you would have, noticed that the only two Sharks players to make the list were Andrew Ettingshausen and Steve Rogers. This has led me to ponder the question: Who was better?
Here's the stats:....Ettingshausen....Rogers
Games played
for Sharks:................328..............232
Points scored
for Sharks:................662...............1253
Games played
for NSW:....................27.................21
Games played
for Australia:................29.................21
I'm sure there's more comparable stats, but to me, thats the big 4. I know others will suggest that the likes of David Peachey and Gavin Miller should be included, but I neglected them purely because they werent selected in the top 100.
MY PICK: Ettingshausen. And I have only 2 supporting reasons:
1: The amount of games played for cronulla - undying loyalty
2: Because Rogers committed the heinous crime of putting on a red and white jersy...
What does everyone else think?
Here's the stats:....Ettingshausen....Rogers
Games played
for Sharks:................328..............232
Points scored
for Sharks:................662...............1253
Games played
for NSW:....................27.................21
Games played
for Australia:................29.................21
I'm sure there's more comparable stats, but to me, thats the big 4. I know others will suggest that the likes of David Peachey and Gavin Miller should be included, but I neglected them purely because they werent selected in the top 100.
MY PICK: Ettingshausen. And I have only 2 supporting reasons:
1: The amount of games played for cronulla - undying loyalty
2: Because Rogers committed the heinous crime of putting on a red and white jersy...
What does everyone else think?