sharks2010
Dribbler
agreed. How many previous boards tried and failed?Anyone who thinks the property development was not a 'big deal' has an agenda against those who got it through. Plain and simple.
agreed. How many previous boards tried and failed?Anyone who thinks the property development was not a 'big deal' has an agenda against those who got it through. Plain and simple.
just spewed up my bacon and eggs....thanks MBSteve Keen wants to r00t julia gillard
Steve Keen wants to r00t julia gillard
If you don't care don't post. Slink off into the sunset and eat a poo pie.
Root Gillard. Well argued and well put. Again a win on the field and if all goes how it is supposed to this week there will be a win off. And you guys can applaud your club and new management for turning it around. Or you can be divisive and critical of ????
"Clueless", as opposed to you who says "Damian Irvine should have been re-elected" and pushing his barrow. How much corporate & brand damage do you think he did to the club with one comment? And I hear you trumpeting on about the new board and criticizing them when they've been there all of how long, and criticizing directors for being away when Irvine himself was away when he had "to attend to business", and then comes back and says publicly players were taking horse roids in front of the media, great PR job that one and way to protect your club and players. I'd say with your analysis of the situation you're completely and utterly clueless about business. "Clueless" you say(property development) lots of intensive negotiation involved, even you could perhaps negotiate it, but I doubt it with your completely and utterly biased views. I am just glad you hold no sway on anything in this club, maybe just on this internet forum, because it's obvious you have no idea as it's indicative of the opinions you hold & what happened at the board elections. Enough said.
You know where the Enter key is angry ant?
Has nothing to do with barbies.
Illicit drug use is rife in society.
What's to think young men earning big dollars with spare time are going to be any less inclined to use them?
Your the one who should be playing with kids toys if you can't see that reality.
****ing muppet.
I know they have only been in place for a few months, but they made big promises in their glitzy election campaign and one must question what they are delivering.
1. 'The sacked 4' have not been reinstated. Perhaps the new board now know the truth and the previous administration didn't do the wrong thing. Pity the new board was voted in on this issue.
2. No Stadium or front of jersey sponsor. I was under the impression these blokes were from the big end of town and would bring in sponsorship.
3. Local juniors leaving inc Peachy and Townsend. I know the board doesn't decide on recruitment and retention but given they campaigned through the mobilization of some within the junior league I would thought they would have 'encouraged' the football staff to retain the likes of at least Peachy.
I truly hope the new board do wonderful things for the club, however they are no where near leaving up to the hype they generated.
Very much doubt that was the main reason they were voted in.1. 'The sacked 4' have not been reinstated. Perhaps the new board now know the truth and the previous administration didn't do the wrong thing. Pity the new board was voted in on this issue.
3. Local juniors leaving inc Peachy and Townsend. I know the board doesn't decide on recruitment and retention but given they campaigned through the mobilization of some within the junior league I would thought they would have 'encouraged' the football staff to retain the likes of at least Peachy.
I truly hope the new board do wonderful things for the club, however they are no where near leaving up to the hype they generated.
Don't start with this rubbish. You have know idea what they have been doing behind the scenes, none of us do. Would you feel better if they were on Twitter and in the media every second day. The fact that they aren't is a good thing.