CrazyMatt
Jaws
In short, don't be a dick. Don't deliberately vote to make a point or mess up the system.
For sure everyone should vote for who they think was best, but it's fine for people to have different criteria for "best" too.
Some pick the blokes who get involved in a lot of scoring plays - which is fine.
Others pick blokes who have a decent game with 1-2 stand out moments - also fine.
Some pick players who did a whole bunch of dirty work without any involvement in scoring plays or standout moments - also fine.
Some pick Ellie Johnston every week in the women's 321 because they are in love with her - which is borderline.
What is stupid is when someone want to say "so and so was the best by a mile and if you can't see it you've got NFI". That player might have been the best using that person's criteria but why should everyone else be subject to that? Just pick who you want for whatever reason you want - other than for intentionally being a dick.
Basically how I see it, and what I think is the spirit of the 3-2-1.
Pick who you think is the best three players based on your criteria and your honest opinion about who were the best.
Also some need to accept the fact that its ok that others might have differing opinions on who was the best, so no more of the ‘if you didnt pick this player you didnt watch the game’ kind of posts please. They’re not helpful and just make the person who posts that look egotistical and petty. People shouldn’t be insulted and harassed for who they select.
Thankfully, posts like that are very rare imo.