D
Deleted member 2543
Guest
Imo when the Sharks and Tigers had an even share of ball Brailey was creating MORE than Api was.You’re making it sound like Brailey was creating just as much as Api was..
It’s not just about try scoring plays.
Disagree.You put Brailey in that Tigers team yesterday and there is no way he gets anywhere close to what Api did and if you put Api in that Sharks team yesterday he creates chances/opportunities that Brailey could never.
Brailey actually had games last year with similar possession and opportunities as Api did last night, with similar results.
Brailey had one opportunity to take advantage of a quick ptb with no markers inside 20. Setup one try.Brailey had many opportunities to ice on their line, set after set we were camped there.
Being camped at the attacking end means bugger all for the hooker creating opportunities if the forwards are getting rolled on their backs like puppy dogs.
Sure. That doesn’t mean he’s garbage though.I’m ok with understanding Brailey will never be that guy that turns a game for us.
Again - sure. From the 25 minute mark there were more poor performances from Sharks players that could be made up for by any single player.. you literally could’ve put Berrell in there yesterday and the result would’ve been the same
Hooker is dependent on the other players putting in a competent performance, and his team having the ball