Official Blayke Brailey

Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
8,270
Reaction score
2,557
Hodgson, Verrills. So yeah basically every other top 8 team last season had a better hooker than us. Some even had 2. Nice trend.
Hodgson is cooked, and Verrills has barely strung 10 games together without an injury. At this stage neither is a must have over Blayke.
 

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,097
Nah I'm capable of my own thoughts. His game attackwise hasn't improved in 3 years. Maybe I expect too much much from him based off juniors and the hype behind him.
The way he is playing for the Sharks is exactly how he played in juniors and for the Jets. He was rated because of this style of play, and developed to play that way.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 7, 2005
Messages
18,434
Reaction score
2,085
Location
The Ridge!
I'm not sure on Blayke myself but it seems everyone is expecting him to do way more in attack like perhaps Damien Cook does. But did Cam Smith ever make many dashes from dummy half. My memory tells me no.
 

Sparkles

Jaws
Joined
May 21, 2008
Messages
12,078
Reaction score
2,816
I'm not sure on Blayke myself but it seems everyone is expecting him to do way more in attack like perhaps Damien Cook does. But did Cam Smith ever make many dashes from dummy half. My memory tells me no.
Smith had about 41 metres in the GF and averaged around that mark if I recall correctly
 

Sparkles

Jaws
Joined
May 21, 2008
Messages
12,078
Reaction score
2,816
It seems pretty simple... Blayke has shown he's pretty adept at the run, pass, kick (excusing one restart...) and tackle. And that he's pretty sharp between the cauliflours, too. If he's not doing any of those things or a lot of something, it's because that's the gameplan. You'd be better off critisising Fitz if you think our side should include a kicking, running hooker, because he's proven he can do all of those things well. Bomber had him playing that way for a while and he looked great.
 

Rob

Hammerhead
Joined
Aug 12, 2021
Messages
442
Reaction score
246
Going by 2 trials McInnes won’t be spending much time at hooker.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,270
Reaction score
6,119
Location
IN A BAR
I just don't really see where Blayke not running more is hurting us.

Club finished 6th for run meters and 2nd for line breaks (and first for tackle breaks). Potentially pinching a couple extra run meters by our hooker scooting two to three more times per game just doesn't seem to be something which would take us to another level.
Why not pass to the Dally M winning halfback or the guy who lead the league in try contributions instead?
Do you think because Api or Reed ran more they made the Grand Final... because those two blokes ran effectively the exact same amount.

I'd rather we work on no cheap penalties when defending team deep in their own half and getting off to better starts than trying to shoehorn a running game onto the guy who touched the ball the second most in the whole NRL last season (most per game) and also made the second most tackles in the NRL.

Storm 5th Grant/Smith
Cowboys 3rd Robson
Raiders 8th
Bulldogs 12th
Roosters 6th
Dragons 10th
Tigers 16th
Panthers 1st Api
Broncos 9th
Warriors 15th
Rabbitohs 7th Cook
Knights 14th
Eels 4th Mahoney
Sea Eagles 11th
Titans 13th
Sharks 2nd

From the ladder you would maybe say there is a very loose correlation between finishing top 8 and having a hooker that runs a lot.
Probably doesn't hurt their hooker that top 8 teams probably win more forward battles...

When you throw in the distribution of "best" hookers vs runs it spreads it out even more.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
8,270
Reaction score
2,557
I think to a degree some people just like to have something to complain about too. We had a successful season last year despite our finals exit and the club is in the best place it's been since 2016, leaving very little to complain about. Some of the chat about our 6, 9 and 11 would have you thinking we're running out Flanno, Lichaa and Roqica, instead of 3 guys that at the very least are performing in the top half of players in their position.

I guess it's just easier to say someone has no talent, rather than recognise their actually pretty good, but have elements you'd like them to improve on.
 

Wiz

Jaws
Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
5,906
Reaction score
1,514
I just don't really see where Blayke not running more is hurting us.

Club finished 6th for run meters and 2nd for line breaks (and first for tackle breaks). Potentially pinching a couple extra run meters by our hooker scooting two to three more times per game just doesn't seem to be something which would take us to another level.
Why not pass to the Dally M winning halfback or the guy who lead the league in try contributions instead?
Do you think because Api or Reed ran more they made the Grand Final... because those two blokes ran effectively the exact same amount.

I'd rather we work on no cheap penalties when defending team deep in their own half and getting off to better starts than trying to shoehorn a running game onto the guy who touched the ball the second most in the whole NRL last season (most per game) and also made the second most tackles in the NRL.

Storm 5th Grant/Smith
Cowboys 3rd Robson
Raiders 8th
Bulldogs 12th
Roosters 6th
Dragons 10th
Tigers 16th
Panthers 1st Api
Broncos 9th
Warriors 15th
Rabbitohs 7th Cook
Knights 14th
Eels 4th Mahoney
Sea Eagles 11th
Titans 13th
Sharks 2nd

From the ladder you would maybe say there is a very loose correlation between finishing top 8 and having a hooker that runs a lot.
Probably doesn't hurt their hooker that top 8 teams probably win more forward battles...

When you throw in the distribution of "best" hookers vs runs it spreads it out even more.
It’s got nothing to do with running, more so what is he bringing outside of that ? other top 9’s are bringing more to their team outside of running but yet even then they are still running more then Brailey.

So the question is if you aren’t even taking runs then what are you doing ? is he just there to tackle and pass ?
 

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,097
I think to a degree some people just like to have something to complain about too. We had a successful season last year despite our finals exit and the club is in the best place it's been since 2016, leaving very little to complain about. Some of the chat about our 6, 9 and 11 would have you thinking we're running out Flanno, Lichaa and Roqica, instead of 3 guys that at the very least are performing in the top half of players in their position.

I guess it's just easier to say someone has no talent, rather than recognise their actually pretty good, but have elements you'd like them to improve on.
💯
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
8,270
Reaction score
2,557
It’s got nothing to do with running, more so what is he bringing outside of that ? other top 9’s are bringing more to their team outside of running but yet even then they are still running more then Brailey.

So the question is if you aren’t even taking runs then what are you doing ? is he just there to tackle and pass ?
I think the more foundation question should be what constitutes a run? Do you need to run and make x metres, do you need to get tackled with the ball? Out of hookers who get out of dummy half, engage the markers then pass, I'd have him up there in terms of quality.

Where I'd like him to find improvement is in his decision making. I thought last year he overplayed the crash ball a bit resulting in errors, sometimes instead of taking an overlap. I thought he did this once in the first half on Sunday too. It is so hard to know without being on the inside though. For all I know Fitz could be asking him to throw that pass 1-2 times a set when attacking the opposition line to compress the defense and create space. In which case the critique should probably fall to the forwards who need to hold the ball better, or Fitz to change it up a bit. Also without being on the field, when it looks like we take the wrong option, is it because it's his choice, or is he not receiving the chat on the field to tell him where the space is and which way to go?

It's not really an answer to your question, as I struggle to define exactly what the other top 9's are bringing to their team that Blayke isn't doing, without the obvious elements such as exploiting gaps in the middle because they are faster. As a genuine question, could you be more specific as to what you're expecting of him?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wiz

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,270
Reaction score
6,119
Location
IN A BAR
I think to a degree some people just like to have something to complain about too. We had a successful season last year despite our finals exit and the club is in the best place it's been since 2016, leaving very little to complain about. Some of the chat about our 6, 9 and 11 would have you thinking we're running out Flanno, Lichaa and Roqica, instead of 3 guys that at the very least are performing in the top half of players in their position.

I guess it's just easier to say someone has no talent, rather than recognise their actually pretty good, but have elements you'd like them to improve on.
First line for sure. Anyway, It'd be no fun in here if nobody had opinions to... constructively discuss

Per last line I think also some people are critical based on
  • the player not playing the exact style they prefer
  • the grass is always greener. Our player isn't as good as some players in other teams (ignoring we have other players who are better than some other teams and also the whole concept of the cap)
 
Top