Match the completion rates and tackle efficiency and we presumably are right in it.Going of NRL.com stats, sharks pack had 83 runs for 907 metres at 10.92m per run. Souths pack had 90 runs for 961m at 10.67m per run. Yes they had Moaley and Mitchell who are two less regarded players, but Mitchell in particular was fantastic despite whatever you might think of him. That was also complemented by them having Murray and Koloamatangi who were easily the best two forwards on the park.
They won the middle battle on the eye test 100%, they had more speed through the ruck and Cook was able to play well off that. But we weren't raped. We had every chance to win it off the platform that was laid.
Their middle went solid especially down a man (I won't count Arrow, he played more than Williams did) but they didn't make McInnes drop the ball cold or anyone of a dozen other dumb mistakes - their forward platform didn't stop Tricky from kicking a penalty out.
They were more up for it, some early bad luck crushed our confidence and gave them some, defensively our left edge was crazy bad.
I'd fix up any of those things before worrying about the fact the team that played smarter and more confidently with more ball had their forwards look better.
Factor in the 12 point turn around when Ronaldo tried to show off and they scored minutes later and it's a different game
Yeah we need to address our middles - BHU and Royce for mine aren't our future, they're inconsistent and we need a mainstay to lead the pack, but it's not why we lost. Handling errors and some atrocious edge defence are imo.
They both have periods where they look like they can establish themselves as the starter. I do think if one doesn't click this season unless Hazleton soars into contention we should be looking at someone. Not every bigger 'impact prop' will star every game but both of those guys are just a touch too inconsistent still. Injuries havn't helped them.