Tatus
Not-So-Great White
I think there was one or two.... Arthur someone? Some Queenslandlander, meh.I see where you blokes are coming from but how many props have ever played the game like fifita ?
I think there was one or two.... Arthur someone? Some Queenslandlander, meh.I see where you blokes are coming from but how many props have ever played the game like fifita ?
I agree he is something special and he deserves big money due to that. IMO it would be alot easier to rebuild from losing him to losing Carney though. That is the thing that makes me prefer a shorter term deal. He may not cost us Carney if we sign him for five years but it may cost us at an opportunity at someone similar to him.I see where you blokes are coming from but how many props have ever played the game like fifita ?
Yep 1 or 2. Exactly.I think there was one or two.... Arthur someone? Some Queenslandlander, meh.
Carney ??? Last I checked he was signed for 5 years.I agree he is something special and he deserves big money due to that. IMO it would be alot easier to rebuild from losing him to losing Carney though. That is the thing that makes me prefer a shorter term deal. He may not cost us Carney if we sign him for five years but it may cost us at an opportunity at someone similar to him.
at the time, snowden was a 500k prop, and was arguably the best prop in the game.
fifita is the best prop in the game, needs 600k
in 5 years time, 600k will be cheap. he is just as important to the team as Carney. no problem with a 5 year deal
For me thinking on the importance of Carney vs Fifita I think of Brisbane and Webcke and Locky - Locky got the headlines but without Webcke he wouldnt of had the platform to work from. So equally important.
Same as Fifita and Carney. Fifita last year was providing explosive runs (no toliet humor please) and quick play the balls giving Carney time,
Put it this way, if you could only sign one of Carney or Fifita for the same coin, who would you sign? The answer is Carney 100% of the time. We have a decent forward pack even without Fifita, carney would still be a star without him.
For me thinking on the importance of Carney vs Fifita I think of Brisbane and Webcke and Locky - Locky got the headlines but without Webcke he wouldnt of had the platform to work from. So equally important.
Same as Fifita and Carney. Fifita last year was providing explosive runs (no toliet humor please) and quick play the balls giving Carney time,
Put it this way, if you could only sign one of Carney or Fifita for the same coin, who would you sign? The answer is Carney 100% of the time. We have a decent forward pack even without Fifita, carney would still be a star without him.
Now we do.
End of toops, gal, lewis era we dont.
8. Fifita
10. Taga
11. Lewis
12. Graham
13. Gal
Bench
Toops
Heigno
Gibbs
Go 2 years into the future minus fifita, gibbs, gal, toupo, heighno maybe lewis......pack aint lookin so good