Wiz
Jaws
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2016
- Messages
- 5,906
- Reaction score
- 1,514
Manu or Lomax. Who would everyone prefer?
Manu -
If you can get Lomax for 400k less then youd take Lomax, also don’t think it’s true Manu is going for a mill ... can’t be right
Manu or Lomax. Who would everyone prefer?
If you believe Chad signed for 800k surely you believe manu can fetch a mil.Manu -
If you can get Lomax for 400k less then youd take Lomax, also don’t think it’s true Manu is going for a mill ... can’t be right
If you believe Chad signed for 800k surely you believe manu can fetch a mil.
I don’t want to believe that but it is odd that it came out as a correction to the 660ish figure. Usually they update the reported figures down not up.
But at 660 I was glad we didn’t try keep him so 800 is absurd.
Manu I’d expect to see 1mil float around and then end up on 3.4 over 4 years or similar
Yeah I’ll take whichever is the better value deal
That link has nothing about Lomax I could find egg.
Manu TOO Expensive
Bort suggested best deal
Manu is more versatile than Lomax. He can cover a few positions.
I would love to see Hynes and Lomax in the same team, though.
If you believe Chad signed for 800k surely you believe manu can fetch a mil.
Manu TOO Expensive
Bort suggested best deal
I don’t want to believe that but it is odd that it came out as a correction to the 660ish figure. Usually they update the reported figures down not up.
But at 660 I was glad we didn’t try keep him so 800 is absurd.
Manu I’d expect to see 1mil float around and then end up on 3.4 over 4 years or similar
wasnt the 660 referrred to as what his current contract?
chad will make 800k an upgrade on his current 660k deal? or something similar
Sean O'Sullivan or Billy Walters to Sharks on loan for this year only