(Archived) THE RUMOUR MILL - Player Movement

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
28,442
Reaction score
815
Location
NSW
DCE probably would not have signed with the Titans if he was not able to renege. The contract negotiation would have been different. It is the negotiation process that people don't like.

That the Titans are NRL run is irrelevant. There is nothing poetic, it is just another day.

The only reason he signed so early was to boot manly up the ass. Makes em realise he will leave if they cant offer up
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,587
Reaction score
8,512
Location
Sydney
The only reason he signed so early was to boot manly up the ass. Makes em realise he will leave if they cant offer up

Yes and no. Don't forget Foran hadn't signed with Parra at that stage. If Foran stayed with Manly they couldn't have paid DCE what he wanted.
 

ABshark

Vapid
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
7,870
Reaction score
116
Location
NSW
Don't know how I'd feel about that, AB. Was does it do to your cap for the last few years when he's not playing?

Typical weak-ass Carlton response!

Nah but seriously DCE is only 26. 9 years gets him to 35 and he could easily be still playing at that point. By 2024 (or so) the salary cap will be significantly larger and you can wear a year or two down on total payments - hell, Parra are doing it at the moment for reserve graders that they had to get rid of. They're not great but they're competing. Plus you would never have to go through this negotiation shambles again and he automatically becomes a Club stalwart.

FWIW, I think Buddy will play for a lot longer than most expect. The precedent is Alistair Lynch and towards the end of his deal Brisbane had to renegotiate with him to pay him more because he wasn't getting paid fairly!

Also, I like ballsy plays in sport. Proactive, not reactive, ones. I liked how the Western Bulldogs went after Boyd too.
 

ABshark

Vapid
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
7,870
Reaction score
116
Location
NSW
The only reason he signed so early was to boot manly up the ass. Makes em realise he will leave if they cant offer up

If you think back, Manly had actually pulled their offer at the time he signed - he said the other night that it was between the GC and another Club (us). So Manly have finally ponied up and he's got his mate Nate there and all is roses.

The whole thing is a shambles but the wilful ignorance of the Daily Astonisher and the media in general has amplified the general ****tiness of the situation.
 

ABshark

Vapid
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
7,870
Reaction score
116
Location
NSW
Sounds like a dangerous game to me.

No way I'd support us doing something like that.

Too risky?

Think of it this way:

- You guarantee yourself DCE - an elite halfback who has won a Premiership and a Clive Churchill medal in a losing side - for the prime years of his career. You lock in a guy who can win the big ones.

- You don't even have to think about anyone else playing 7 for at least the next 7 or 8 years. i.e. There's no risk of us relying on a terribly mediocre halfback to run our side like we have for about... the last 7 or 8 years (since Noddy left). The Jeff Robsons and Scott Firetruck Porters of this world can stay where they belong - reserve grade.
 

CrankyShark

T Roll
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Messages
3,517
Reaction score
6
If you think back, Manly had actually pulled their offer at the time he signed - he said the other night that it was between the GC and another Club (us). So Manly have finally ponied up and he's got his mate Nate there and all is roses.

The whole thing is a shambles but the wilful ignorance of the Daily Astonisher and the media in general has amplified the general ****tiness of the situation.
Manly pulled the offer with the knowledge they had plenty of time to turn him around. It you change the negotiation paradigm to exclude the rule he can renege by June 30, then Manly up their offer at the time and the whole thing comes to a head much sooner. There is no basis to suggest the rule altered the actual outcome.

I agree with the ten year deal for DCE though. That would have been a risk worth taking.
 

Boundos

Tiger Shark
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
1,148
Reaction score
24
Location
Canberra
Now Carney to sign with GC for 2016 and my prophecy will be complete


oh and Manly to smash us to bits......but that goes without saying
 

slide rule

Jaws
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
20,485
Reaction score
465
Location
General Admission
Too risky?

Think of it this way:

- You guarantee yourself DCE - an elite halfback who has won a Premiership and a Clive Churchill medal in a losing side - for the prime years of his career. You lock in a guy who can win the big ones.

- You don't even have to think about anyone else playing 7 for at least the next 7 or 8 years. i.e. There's no risk of us relying on a terribly mediocre halfback to run our side like we have for about... the last 7 or 8 years (since Noddy left). The Jeff Robsons and Scott Firetruck Porters of this world can stay where they belong - reserve grade.

But what if he gets an injury that isn't enough to retire him but is bad enough to make him a yard slower and a ****ty kicker?
 

ABshark

Vapid
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
7,870
Reaction score
116
Location
NSW
But what if he gets an injury that isn't enough to retire him but is bad enough to make him a yard slower and a ****ty kicker?

That's the obvious risk. I just wanted to point out that there are risks in both directions. The payoff is undeniably huge though.

As I said in my original post, Alistair Lynch is the prototype. He suffered from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome for a few years but the Bears/Lions survived and they went on to win three Premierships on the trot.

As I said, its ballsy. But this is sport, not war - no one is gonna die. Fear of failure is endemic in this Club.
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,587
Reaction score
8,512
Location
Sydney
But what if he gets an injury that isn't enough to retire him but is bad enough to make him a yard slower and a ****ty kicker?

Yeah I agree. A deal like that is far too much in the player's favour. Yes I know, he's not your average player, but still.

The club is stuck with him regardless of what happens now. There are no guarantee he will be the same player in 6 years as he is now. Injuries, whatever, and he still gets a huge pay packet. It might be unlikely, but it could really hurt your club as well.

There's nothing to say he won't spit the dummy anyway at some stage down the track. Maybe another club offers him more, asks for a release, Manly so no, DCE says fine, I'm not playing. Manly are stuck with a massive liability.

I don't see what's wrong with offering a 5 year deal.
 

common

Great White
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,652
Reaction score
439
Location
The Internet
Watching the live stream of comments on news site for the DCE conference. DCE is just scum in my opinion. Overrated, not worth the money, and not a person of his word.
 

common

Great White
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,652
Reaction score
439
Location
The Internet
DCE: Everything happens for a reason. Without everything that's gone on over the last couple of months I wouldn't be sitting here with this opportunity.

DCE; If this is a reason to change the rules for the benefit of the game then I'm happy with that.

DCE: I definitely let the door open to let the speculation continue.

DCE: I was definitely curious to see what was on the table from Manly.

DCE: My decision was changed very recently. In the last 48 hours it's fair to say.

Few key things there being that he was happy to leave the door open for a big $$ offer from Manly. Is what he was hoping for I reckon. Curious to see what they would offer blah blah
 

sharkyboy

Jaws
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
15,273
Reaction score
105
Location
N.S.W
Man some of the questions are so ****ing arrogant and personal.

I hate Manly and i don't like DCE, but some questions are pathetic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top