2023 NRL Round 7 Cronulla Sutherland Sharks v Sydney Roosters @ Pointsbet Stadium Friday 14th April @ 6pm

[Milkshark]

The Roosters are just sitting in him, knowing they don't really have to worry about anyone else.

Yeah they’re up on him quick

 

[sharkstragic]

Mate you have no idea. This is my first post on this subject

Apologies ,

 

[Deleted member 3365]

Hynes is trying to do everything, no wonder his lost, Moylan is just being the typical passenger.

 

[Born&bred]

Should be way more behind than this. Apart from the two tries I thought we looked to have a bit more steel in our defence.

Our attack has been terrible, but put it down to the Roosters line speed. They are robots out there.

There are no gaps and hardly any missed tackles from them.

12-8 is flattering us at the moment. I’d back the Roosters to score another 2-3 tries at least and I’d be surprised if we score any more.

This is everything we don't do in defence, and SHOULD ffs

 

[MMsharks]

how do roosters not get a man in the bin after four penalties in the ten???
to be just given a warning after the four infringements and it could have been another two on top
but some delusional ppl will defend that and say "oh we should take that and be submissive" The refs never get it wrong


and the 7-forward passes by the roosters vs the one by sharks. nichos forward pass was legit and picked up
but there have been some really dubious ones that are called "flat' wow

 

[Steve Kneen]

So instead of binning someone for the repeated infringements when the Sharks could have scored, Atkins gives a warning at HT. Blocker said it was the "Roosters defence", no it wasn't, it was the repeated infringements, and the slow down of the play the ball that's been going on all game from the Roosters that saved them. The repeat set infringements were useless, as they were on tackle 1 or 2 & there was 1:30 left.

The 'try' from Smith looked short.

Roosters hold down all game, needs a binning, and hanging on to the ball in the play the ball or strangling blokes.

 

[MMsharks]

Roosters should have had another 10 in the bin there. How many infringements in a row.

exactly but the LOYAL sharks fans will say "no thats ok" we played sh!t

the game is guided, the game is controlled

 

[Sir Chadley]

how do roosters not get a man in the bin after four penalties in the ten???
to be just given a warning after the four infringements and it could have been another two on top
but some delusional ppl will defend that and say "oh we should take that and be submissive" The refs never get it wrong


and the 7-forward passes by the roosters vs the one by sharks. nichos forward pass was legit and picked up
but there have been some really dubious ones that are called "flat' wow

Mate Nicho’s pass was miles forward, I was right in line with it.

 

[sharkstragic]

Hynes is trying to do everything, no wonder his lost, Moylan is just being the typical passenger.

So instead of binning someone for the repeated infringements when the Sharks could have scored, Atkins gives a warning at HT. Blocker said it was the "Roosters defence", no it wasn't, it was the repeated infringements, and the slow down of the play the ball that's been going on all game from the Roosters that saved them. The repeat set infringements were useless, as they were on tackle 1 or 2 & there was 1:30 left.

The 'try' from Smith looked short.

Roosters hold down all game, needs a binning, and hanging on to the ball in the play the ball or strangling blokes.

They are cheating on D no doubt, but Atkin’s won’t do **** about it .

The try was fine he got something in the line

 

[Milkshark]

I try not to blame refs, became it’s a cop out a lot of the time. But, if you’re playing the ball on the oppositions line and they’re offside every single PTB, your attacking options are super limited with the lack of room to move.

If you allow teams to do it withjust set restarts, the defending team will keep doing it. It’s not conserving energy.

Someone should be in the bin.

 

[MMsharks]

So instead of binning someone for the repeated infringements when the Sharks could have scored, Atkins gives a warning at HT. Blocker said it was the "Roosters defence", no it wasn't, it was the repeated infringements, and the slow down of the play the ball that's been going on all game from the Roosters that saved them. The repeat set infringements were useless, as they were on tackle 1 or 2 & there was 1:30 left.

The 'try' from Smith looked short.

Roosters hold down all game, needs a binning, and hanging on to the ball in the play the ball or strangling blokes.

be careful mate your not allowed to have an opinion in a "forum"
you will told to shut up

 

[Greg86]

Cheese and Radley do a lot of cleanup work and push the boundaries every time.

Let’s not be asleep after halftime.

 

[Sharkfox]

Dont worry guys, sharks will come out firing second half like the dragons game

 

[MMsharks]

and roosters placing ball on ground and not getting to the feet

i thought that was a thing in recent times and refs penalised it

 

[common]

exactly but the LOYAL sharks fans will say "no thats ok" we played sh!t

the game is guided, the game is controlled

Ha they can say what they want, and be as blind as they want.

 

[jocktheshark]

We really need to find some line speed in attack and defence .

 

[Pishposh46]

To have a chance we need to keep Roosters down to our level and maybe jag another lucky try.

 

[Thresher]

Because they'd already had a binning I reckon the Roosters knew they could ride their luck

 

[MMsharks]

Dont worry guys, sharks will come out firing second half like the dragons game

hope so
i reckon you might be onto something there

 

[sharkstragic]

and roosters placing ball on ground and not getting to the feet

i thought that was a thing in recent times and refs penalised it

You can do it .. if you lose the ball your ****ed though