sharkstragic
Jaws
Never did. I disagreed that it had no effect on the result . Every decision has an effect in the resultYou can't blank out the rest of the game and say that moment was all that made the difference either mate
Never did. I disagreed that it had no effect on the result . Every decision has an effect in the resultYou can't blank out the rest of the game and say that moment was all that made the difference either mate
Nah. Everyone feels Penrith just played betterHaven't read yet, any ref chat?
Nah pretty quite other than him costing us the game….Haven't read yet, any ref chat?
But have reasonably suggested we should have just played the perfect game of footballNah. Everyone feels Penrith just played better
Exactly , i Mean that’s what Penrith did yeah?But have reasonably suggested we should have just played the perfect game of football
The usual blend of balance and impartiality reallyBut have reasonably suggested we should have just played the perfect game of football
If we eradicate 50% of our errors and have similar “ref issues”, then I’ll heartily agree they may affect the result of the game. But if we did get rid of the errors we’ve probably won so no need to analyse things.Never did. I disagreed that it had no effect on the result . Every decision has an effect in the result
Look 95% of what I say should be taken with a grain of salt. The other 5% is conjectureThe usual blend of balance and impartiality really
just remember if someone mentions an individual error or missed tackle that must be the only moment in the game they think mattered, so it’s important to correct them that that exact thing wouldn’t have mattered if other circumstances were differentThe usual blend of balance and impartiality really
You wouldn't have said that if we'd stopped that early second half tryjust remember if someone mentions an individual error or missed tackle that must be the only moment in the game they think mattered, so it’s important to correct them that that exact thing wouldn’t have mattered if other circumstances were different
If we lost by 40 that would make sense. We lost by 10 , against the premiers, you need some of those calls to go your wayIf we eradicate 50% of our errors and have similar “ref issues”, then I’ll heartily agree they may affect the result of the game. But if we did get rid of the errors we’ve probably won so no need to analyse things.
If we played tiger tonight we would have wonjust remember if someone mentions an individual error or missed tackle that must be the only moment in the game they think mattered, so it’s important to correct them that that exact thing wouldn’t have mattered if other circumstances were different
Ahhh thought that night be the caseNah. Everyone feels Penrith just played better
This, 100%Please guys - stop blaming the ref. Yes a few things went against us but that's footy. Great teams get the benefit of the doubt.
We lost plain and simple because:
We played the first 25 like we did against Melb a few weeks ago. The remaining 55 we played like we did against Broncs and Raiders. The only difference now is that our defence is better and the wet conditions kept it a contest.
This one hurt. It was a winnable game.
Not sure I’m getting my point across so I’ll leave it there. We actually did have a few calls go our way.If we lost by 40 that would make sense. We lost by 10 , against the premiers, you need some of those calls to go your way
That one irks me because it was a double whammy. Anyways it was a semi final type game hope we learnt somethingNot sure I’m getting my point across so I’ll leave it there. We actually did have a few calls go our way.
We only made two more mistakes then Penrith but we completed at 70%If we eradicate 50% of our errors and have similar “ref issues”, then I’ll heartily agree they may affect the result of the game. But if we did get rid of the errors we’ve probably won so no need to analyse things.