- May 7, 2006
- Reaction score
Sounds like Chooks are their key tenants who keep the lights on for everyone else. If you're renting the majority of a building year round but I hire a conference room for a month should I be entitled to the same "ownership" as you?As a fan , I'd be stoked with home of the Sharks plastered all over it ( Sharks Glasses )
I see both sides , if the City's Olympic Stadium had Home of the Rabbitohs up in lights plastered on the side of the stadium itself , come the Olympics in year 2000 , I feel most of Sydney would complain .
STUFF the Roosters thinking they own it
Just my thoughts and I believe Rabbits should be able to negotiate home games there too , it is in their historic geographic area , without the Roosters trying to block it .
Like Bronco's not wanting to share Suncorp with Dolphins and Home of the Bronco's signs all over it
Rabbits have tenancy agreements with another stadium. Suncorp is home of Broncos. Dolphins are from Redcliffe and will have their own ground.
As you said you'd like it for us but not them so you see its good business. Politis isn't mega rich because he concedes ground and makes rivals comfortable.