2013 NRL General Discussion Thread

[gando2230]

Is this a first. A player on report Billy Slater then gets ch9's
Man of the match.

 

[Thresher]

I hate the Storm - but it is impossible for anyone here to put a logical argument stating Dogs were robbed. Storm were far better.

who said that? you're pickin' a fight with shadows

 

[Born&bred]

who said that? you're pickin' a fight with shadows

I could quote a few posts - most of them are friends of mine & they know what I'm talking about.

Some of them wouldn't agree - but they're still my friends,.

You're the fwit "pickin' a fight with shadows" - who the **** are you?

 

[Bundy Shark]

wtf? I don't understand the last couple of posts.

 

[Born&bred]

wtf? I don't understand the last couple of posts.

I don't understand thresher fish having a shot at me either

 

[Thresher]

I could quote a few posts - most of them are friends of mine & they know what I'm talking about.

Some of them wouldn't agree - but they're still my friends,.

You're the fwit "pickin' a fight with shadows" - who the **** are you?

just having a jibe, settle down

 

[Born&bred]

just having a jibe, settle down

Was settled all the time man - just responded to what you posted...

 

[Thresher]

cool

 

[dylan the villian]

anyone else notice storm are missing a lower back jersey sponser and Rear of short spono. And also dogs had there lower rear jersey whited out/covered up?

 

[JakeTheSnake]

Without scrolling back to far.. has anyone heard the whispers going around about a certain owner (gladiator) having a good go with a couple (2 + twins) of imported pommies mum in the sack, I heard it a few weeks ago from a roosters supporter but I heard it last night from a mate who is an ex south's employee (works for a different club now) with family links at the club who basically confirmed it... no need to name source.. happy to though. . Lol

Part of the contract maybe..... Come to Aus and bring ya mum!! Hahaha

 

[Bundy Shark]

I heard that some time back, it has been denied but I suppose they would deny it regardless, in saying that she's not a bad sort for a "mature woman".

 

[SHARKSTER]

I could quote a few posts - most of them are friends of mine & they know what I'm talking about.

Some of them wouldn't agree - but they're still my friends,.

You're the fwit "pickin' a fight with shadows" - who the **** are you?

No disagreement here matey. Storm way better. My only point was the grub extending his leg. Even if this is a technique he uses, it is dangerous.

 

[snowman]

Is this a first. A player on report Billy Slater then gets ch9's
Man of the match.

no

 

[Loyal Shark]

Slater extended his leg intentionally to deflect the attacking player. The SLo Mo clearly proved the act was intentional . No question he will receive a ban. I agree Storm were the better team though.

 

[JimBob]

Slater extended his leg intentionally to deflect the attacking player. The SLo Mo clearly proved the act was intentional . No question he will receive a ban. I agree Storm were the better team though.

It was CLEARLY intentional.

I'm sick of Storm bitching about how it was a harsh call.

 

[josh11223344]

haha bull**** it was intentional, he's been taking high balls like that for as long as I can remember!

 

[SHARKSTER]

haha bull**** it was intentional, he's been taking high balls like that for as long as I can remember!

Entitled to your opinion. It is an intentional act to prevent players getting to him. It has caught up with him now.

 

[snowman]

haha bull**** it was intentional, he's been taking high balls like that for as long as I can remember!

 

[Bundy Shark]

I can't say one way or the other if Slater meant that or not, previously when he & other fullbacks do leap like that, that sort of style can happen, with super slow mo replays it probably makes it look dodgier than it was, in saying that Slater does have grubiness to his game so I can understand the others that are saying it was deliberate.

 

[SHARKSTER]

The protected species gets away with playing footsie yet again.