Official 2024 NRL General Discussion

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,560
Reaction score
6,373
Location
IN A BAR
Maybe if there was more consequence for ****ing up and getting it wrong, more would be forced to learn?

I dunno. Just thinking that the more we see tackles like the one that KO'd Suli, the closer we're going to get to a reactive change that hasn't been thought through.
I think you'll see greater across the board technique change with much more effort at lower grades to teach and reward good tackle technique than punishing establishing guys.
Reward legs tackle with a longer allowances to hold on in NRL to encourage it.
Stop showing highlights which were penalties in the game for a high shot, or look like they should have been.

Be interesting to see how NFL goes with their reduced kick-off rule. Their kick-offs were always different to ours with upfield blockers but the issue was the same - high impact collisions from big run ups.

I don't know that I ever really had good tackle technique enforced in me as a kid, and I had none as an adult (although managed to not give up too many high shots and as the tackler only an unexpectedly dipped head really got my eyes rolling around).

Mate is reluctantly starting to coach his sons union team because everyone else was even more reluctant. He said he's got no idea what he's doing doesn't know how to teach the kids how to legally tackle in union as it has changed so much since he played. He's going to try and learn how. When the coach is the least reluctant dad and feels like they have to go out of their way to learn how to teach tackling what hope do the kids have of developing good technique?
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
15,436
Reaction score
3,881
Location
Perth WA
Maybe if there was more consequence for ****ing up and getting it wrong, more would be forced to learn?

I dunno. Just thinking that the more we see tackles like the one that KO'd Suli, the closer we're going to get to a reactive change that hasn't been thought through.
So what’s new?
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
8,580
Reaction score
2,883
I think you'll see greater across the board technique change with much more effort at lower grades to teach and reward good tackle technique than punishing establishing guys.
Reward legs tackle with a longer allowances to hold on in NRL to encourage it.
Stop showing highlights which were penalties in the game for a high shot, or look like they should have been.

Be interesting to see how NFL goes with their reduced kick-off rule. Their kick-offs were always different to ours with upfield blockers but the issue was the same - high impact collisions from big run ups.

I don't know that I ever really had good tackle technique enforced in me as a kid, and I had none as an adult (although managed to not give up too many high shots and as the tackler only an unexpectedly dipped head really got my eyes rolling around).

Mate is reluctantly starting to coach his sons union team because everyone else was even more reluctant. He said he's got no idea what he's doing doesn't know how to teach the kids how to legally tackle in union as it has changed so much since he played. He's going to try and learn how. When the coach is the least reluctant dad and feels like they have to go out of their way to learn how to teach tackling what hope do the kids have of developing good technique?
Yeah I'm not sure about the park footy level. I think if you make change at the top though it immediately will filter down. No doubt more skill in the junior stages would be desirable.
 

beaver2233

Tiger Shark
Joined
May 7, 2022
Messages
1,268
Reaction score
738

Love these articles (more so the stats/charts). Good to see how the sharks are generally tracking in different areas.
 

Addy

Jaws
Joined
Jun 21, 2010
Messages
8,850
Reaction score
1,025
Location
NSW/ACT
NRL (and AFL) are banking on the next generation of players, and next players association contract negotiations, to solve the concussion issue.

They'll say they will make the game safer, employ more doctors, do more research, more protocols, but, you won't be able to sue them at any stage. You'll be given the choice to play and the choice to quit. If you keep playing with repeated head knocks, that's on you.

And then get an 18yr old to sign a $350k contract with this clause.

The only reason the league's are so worried about it now is because it's such a grey area as to who will be ultimately blamed.
 

Thresher

Jaws
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
24,880
Reaction score
3,567
Location
Melbourne
Yeah, I wonder in the future whether a lawsuit or lawsuits for concussion-related injuries could bankrupt a club.

Not sure what kind of insurance clubs get for these things and whether the NRL would step in and help.
 
Top