ASADA Saga Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

SharkShocked

Bull Shark
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
2,311
Reaction score
54
They are grown men and had the power to question what they were taking, even the power to say no. They didn't so they were punished. They should let it go IMO.

Would you if it effected your career prospects later in life?

Do you think those Essendon lads who may go for jobs as trainers or assistants at clubs in the future are not going to be influenced by it? "Nah not him, he was one of those juicers"

Sure you can say they should have asked questions, but either way it happened at the club. Club has been proven to have failed its code of conduct in player safety. So of course you'd imagine there would be some level of dissent over the whole thing.

I find it funny that everyone seems to have this opinion that, because the onus is on the athlete to check what is being given to them, it automatically robs them of their right to then go after the club.

Will be very interesting to see whether or not the players take a class action against the club down there at Essendon.

Very glad we cut deals with our players re legal action.
 

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,550
Reaction score
8,451
Location
Sydney
Would you if it effected your career prospects later in life?

Do you think those Essendon lads who may go for jobs as trainers or assistants at clubs in the future are not going to be influenced by it? "Nah not him, he was one of those juicers"

Sure you can say they should have asked questions, but either way it happened at the club. Club has been proven to have failed its code of conduct in player safety. So of course you'd imagine there would be some level of dissent over the whole thing.

I find it funny that everyone seems to have this opinion that, because the onus is on the athlete to check what is being given to them, it automatically robs them of their right to then go after the club.

Will be very interesting to see whether or not the players take a class action against the club down there at Essendon.

Very glad we cut deals with our players re legal action.

Personally, I would be checking every ingredient of everything I was being told to take, it's a very simple thing to do these days. If I found anything to be on the banned list I would inform other players and blow the whistle.
 

SharkShocked

Bull Shark
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
2,311
Reaction score
54
I agree with that sentiment as a fan and general observer of sport.

However, i can accept that the boys club and footy mentality that exists in sport probably lends itself to just trusting the 'trained' medical staff and individuals in the club.

I'm not at all close to anyone that has or plays at that level of sport so i can't really judge on the pressures that may be placed on individuals trying to break into first team.

I can completely see how you may have a situation where by players that buck the trend or players that go down that path of doubting information or supplements that are given / recommended could be putting their own chances at jeopardy.

You would like to think that the above situation doesn't happen. But i could see how it could manifest.
 

Thresher

Jaws
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
24,882
Reaction score
3,568
Location
Melbourne
Personally, I would be checking every ingredient of everything I was being told to take, it's a very simple thing to do these days. If I found anything to be on the banned list I would inform other players and blow the whistle.

Easy to say as old fellas like us but when I was 20 years old I would have kept my mouth shut and done what I was told
 

Thresher

Jaws
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
24,882
Reaction score
3,568
Location
Melbourne
I don't think you would these days with the amount of education around about it. They all get taught about it.

Some are shyer and less forthright than others eg I'd imagine that Feki wouldn't have been to outspoken to start with. I guess that's where the senior players should be proactive and step in though.
 

Shark Magnet

Tiger Shark
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
1,261
Reaction score
2
Location
Central Coast NSW
In her article today "How Cronulla dodged a bullet" she states the first possible understanding of the difference between us and the bombers. Our indiscretion was over 6 weeks and the bombers over a much longer time period.

She of course cant leave it like that because of her poison pen....
 
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
28,440
Reaction score
811
Location
NSW
In her article today "How Cronulla dodged a bullet" she states the first possible understanding of the difference between us and the bombers. Our indiscretion was over 6 weeks and the bombers over a much longer time period.

She of course cant leave it like that because of her poison pen....

She just doesnt want to say......'the only difference between the sharks and essendon is that there was a severe lack of evidence that could prove player a took a specified substance. They could never prove that anyone was in fact given a particular drug. Through admission they proved the players took something but not what player took what.
 

Addy

Jaws
Joined
Jun 21, 2010
Messages
8,852
Reaction score
1,027
Location
NSW/ACT
Essendon players undoing was the players wouldn't even admit to taking anything, legal or illegal.

That, and the brickwalling and legal threats against ASADA.

This will be the only time Dave Smiths imcompentance will ever produce something positive.
 

Born&bred

Jaws
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
12,973
Reaction score
971
Location
The Bar
Essendon players challenged German laboratory testing in Court of Arbitration for Sport

ESSENDON players challenged the findings of a German laboratory and said tests which were carried out were insufficient to establish whether any of them had taken the banned substance TB-4.

The 48-page Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) report which detailed the panel’s findings also stated the AFL argued that players should be treated as unwitting victims of gross negligence.

In summing up some of the arguments put forward by lawyers for the players, the CAS report stated: “In so far as WADA’s case is based on the findings of the Cologne laboratory, it was insufficient to establish that any player...was injected with TB-4.”
The players maintain they did nothing wrong, with captain Jobe Watson describing the banning of 34 past and present Bombers players as “devastating”.

In another section of the CAS report which deals with legal arguments by the AFL, the document states: “If the panel finds that any player did use a prohibited substance, it was because he was the unwilling and unwitting victim of the gross negligence of others.”
Players Jobe Watson, Mark McVeigh, David Hille, Cory Dell’Olio, Scott Gumbleton, Brent Prismall and Ricky Dyson were all called before the panel at the CAS hearing to give evidence.

In the report, key elements and submissions from players which led to the finding were detailed.
When asked about why he didn’t make a disclosure on doping control forms, Hille, who retired from the game in 2013, said: “You list the things that you feel you need to list...it was just something I didn’t think to list.’’
In reference to his receipt of more than one injection a week, Corey Dell’Olio, who was delisted by the club in 2014, couldn’t specify exactly how many times he’d been injected.

“One time... a couple of times ...a few times,’’ Dell’Olio was quoted as saying in the report.
Midfielder Ricky Dyson, who was also delisted in 2012, told the panel that the doping control form obliged him to refer only to supplements taken within “a period of one to two days”.

The CAS report also stated that forward Scott Gumbleton, who left the club for Fremantle but then quit footy at the end of 2014, conceded that he would have disclosed injections “had he been tested when in receipt of them’’.

It also pointed to comments from Brent Prismall, who now plays for Footscray in the VFL.
“I don’t recall who gave it to me, it was probably just sitting in a pile and I picked it up with the majority of the other blokes,’’ Prismall said, according to the report.

The report went on to state that though several of the players disputed they had been instructed to keep the program confidential, “(the players’) behaviour, keeping the club doctors out of the loop, and failing to record the injections on the doping control forms, clearly justifies such inference being drawn. This was, at its lowest, consistent with an appreciation of its controversial nature.’’

http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/es...t/news-story/7e32ee3ee979b4c4b0269ed54b02693b

Hmmmm...
 

Shark Magnet

Tiger Shark
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
1,261
Reaction score
2
Location
Central Coast NSW
Essendon players undoing was the players wouldn't even admit to taking anything, legal or illegal.

That, and the brickwalling and legal threats against ASADA.

This will be the only time Dave Smiths imcompentance will ever produce something positive.


Poor bastard, first day on the job, deer in headlights.
 

ABshark

Vapid
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
7,870
Reaction score
116
Location
NSW
Dave Smith wasn't at all incompetent. In fact, his handling of the ASADA situation in particular is looking better by the day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top