D
Deleted member 3365
Guest
What was Trindall going to do?
Exactly! Why even have him on the bench?
What was Trindall going to do?
In case we need him or to rest Nicho if we ever came out at halftimeExactly! Why even have him on the bench?
You don’t know that unless your Fitz - stop assumingIn case we need him or to rest Nicho if we ever came out at halftime
Pretty poor excuse to anticipate whether he needed to rest Hynes.In case we need him or to rest Nicho if we ever came out at halftime
I don’t know what you want me to say man I didnt pick the teamPretty poor excuse to anticipate whether he needed to rest Hynes.
Because we would have won that's why. DerrrrrWhat was Trindall going to do?
He was going to use him if correct circumstances arose.I don't see the point to having a player on the bench if your not going to use him , just in case Hynes goes down or hurt isn't valid , you need a 4th player that you can put on to affect the game .
That’s not the point. The point is picking a player on the bench he didn’t use which means we played with a man down. Poor coaching decisionHe was going to use him if correct circumstances arose.
I don’t see the point in worrying about whether player 17 gets 0, 5, 10 or 15 mins
Ahh common senseThat’s not the point. The point is picking a player on the bench he didn’t use which means we played with a man down. Poor coaching decision
What Moylan did especially bad though was tryline defence.I agree that an additional forward wouldn’t have made a lick of difference.
Also agree why Trindall was picked but I’d argue that there was significant reasons to replace Moylan with trindall in this game. I loathe to say it but Townsend was hooked for les
Well you would like someone capable of actually defending them lol. Especially when they can do everything the player their replacing can do anyway.What Moylan did especially bad though was tryline defence.
If youre subbing a half because half a dozen errors by other people keep making them have to defend tryline you’re not fixing the issue the team is having.
I don't either , what i'm saying is have 4 players that can all contribute , have a plan to utilize your bench to it's full potential , having someone there just in case doesn't offer anything to the game being played .He was going to use him if correct circumstances arose.
I don’t see the point in worrying about whether player 17 gets 0, 5, 10 or 15 mins
I don’t think Trindall consistently defends our tryline either, especially not without help from second rower.Well you would like someone capable of actually defending them lol. Especially when they can do everything the player their replacing can do anyway.
How do you think that applies for Trindall though?I don't either , what i'm saying is have 4 players that can all contribute , have a plan to utilize your bench to it's full potential , having someone there just in case doesn't offer anything to the game being played .