2023 NRL General Discussion

HaroldBishop

Megalodon
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
55,286
Reaction score
8,094
Location
Sydney

Sparkles

Jaws
Joined
May 21, 2008
Messages
12,136
Reaction score
2,876
In related news, because the Dolphins are playing at Suncorp, it meant they were not able to accommodate as many concerts as they had hoped, and Harry Styles was not able to play in Brisbane.

On behalf of the city of Brisbane I would like to extend my thanks to everyone at the Dolphins for making this happen.
You'd imagine Bennett is a massive Harry fan, too. Bitter sweet.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,389
Reaction score
6,210
Location
IN A BAR
I reckon whichever team recieves the spoon. misses Magic Round the year after .
Would add incentive to bottom dwellers and to their fans to aim up
That's a good way of determining in theory
But they'd hate to potentially lose a Queensland team from a crowd perspective

Also causes a hassle if a team who was giving up a home game drops out, as they'd need to change that.
At the moment I believe the teams who gave up a home game (for cash) the first year are given opportunity to retain that option, or drop out if they wish. And most have been happy to keep collecting the money.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: egg

egg

Jaws
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
12,865
Reaction score
1,051
That's a good way of determining in theory
But they'd hate to potentially lose a Queensland team from a crowd perspective

Also causes a hassle if a team who was giving up a home game drops out, need to change that.
At the moment I believe the teams who gave up a home game (for cash) the first year are given opportunity to retain that option, or drop out of they wish. And most have been happy to keep collecting the money.
Have it in another city IF all 3 QLD teams arn't good enough not to avoid the spoon
 

egg

Jaws
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
12,865
Reaction score
1,051
there's 4 Qld teams egg
Was talking near by .
BUT , yep
If 4 QLD teams can't avoid the spoon
Give it to someone else , GOOD incentive NOT to be the team that Lost Magic Round from QLD the year after
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
8,432
Reaction score
2,725
Little summation from reddit on latest cap dealings. I haven't been able to read the full article so these are not my notes.

• The NRL has proposed a 2023 salary-cap figure of $12.5 million from $10.2m - an increase of 22.5 percent (avg. Wage growth for lay people was 2.7 percent);

• NRL players have been offered an extra $222 million over the next five years;

• NRL Women are set to celebrate record salaries as part of a $115m funding injection over the next five years;

• The NRLW salary cap is slated to rise from $350,000 to $800,000 next season - a whopping 146 per cent pay rise for females; and

• V’landys wants the minimum wage for NRL development players to be lifted from $80,000 this season to $125,000 next season - a 56 per cent increase for rookies.

Despite this being the largest pay rise on Rugby League history the RLPA has rejected it wanting more but haven't really said what they want apart from demanding to see NRLs books.

 

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,097
Little summation from reddit on latest cap dealings. I haven't been able to read the full article so these are not my notes.

• The NRL has proposed a 2023 salary-cap figure of $12.5 million from $10.2m - an increase of 22.5 percent (avg. Wage growth for lay people was 2.7 percent);

• NRL players have been offered an extra $222 million over the next five years;

• NRL Women are set to celebrate record salaries as part of a $115m funding injection over the next five years;

• The NRLW salary cap is slated to rise from $350,000 to $800,000 next season - a whopping 146 per cent pay rise for females; and

V’landys wants the minimum wage for NRL development players to be lifted from $80,000 this season to $125,000 next season - a 56 per cent increase for rookies.

Despite this being the largest pay rise on Rugby League history the RLPA has rejected it wanting more but haven't really said what they want apart from demanding to see NRLs books.

Cheers.

Bold part is a bit confusing. It’s players 27-30 who make $80k. Not dev players.

Pay rise for fringe players is great for Rugby League imo. Not everyone is a superstar. The more blokes who can make good money the better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
8,432
Reaction score
2,725
Cheers.

Bold part is a bit confusing. It’s players 27-30 who make $80k. Not dev players.

Pay rise for fringe players is great for Rugby League imo. Not everyone is a superstar. The more blokes who can make good money the better.
Yeah absolutely. There was a take during the week about it from Harry Grant where he said for a lot of guys on those lower tier contracts they are better off on the tools. The more guys who can afford to train and commit full-time will only help improve the quality of players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob

BurgoShark

Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
12,868
Reaction score
4,097
Yeah absolutely. There was a take during the week about it from Harry Grant where he said for a lot of guys on those lower tier contracts they are better off on the tools. The more guys who can afford to train and commit full-time will only help improve the quality of players.
Yeah. Saw that from Grant. Hopefully he is legitimately sticking up for those guys rather than just trying to jack the number up. Usually when they raise the cap by $1m the top 5 blokes each get another $200k and the guys on minimum get sweet f-a.

I think if they are raising the cap by $2.5m it would good to see at least $1m of that go in to the bottom half of the roster.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
8,432
Reaction score
2,725
Yeah. Saw that from Grant. Hopefully he is legitimately sticking up for those guys rather than just trying to jack the number up. Usually when they raise the cap by $1m the top 5 blokes each get another $200k and the guys ok minimum get sweet fa.
Yeah I had those same thoughts. There definitely has been a strong angle for the lower paid guys during these negotiations.
 

bort

Jaws
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
30,389
Reaction score
6,210
Location
IN A BAR
Little summation from reddit on latest cap dealings. I haven't been able to read the full article so these are not my notes.

• The NRL has proposed a 2023 salary-cap figure of $12.5 million from $10.2m - an increase of 22.5 percent (avg. Wage growth for lay people was 2.7 percent);

• NRL players have been offered an extra $222 million over the next five years;

• NRL Women are set to celebrate record salaries as part of a $115m funding injection over the next five years;

• The NRLW salary cap is slated to rise from $350,000 to $800,000 next season - a whopping 146 per cent pay rise for females; and

• V’landys wants the minimum wage for NRL development players to be lifted from $80,000 this season to $125,000 next season - a 56 per cent increase for rookies.

Despite this being the largest pay rise on Rugby League history the RLPA has rejected it wanting more but haven't really said what they want apart from demanding to see NRLs books.

Well it's that lot holding it up now then.
Accept it for 2022 and get out of the way, you can fight for even more for 2023.

Cheers.

Bold part is a bit confusing. It’s players 27-30 who make $80k. Not dev players.

Pay rise for fringe players is great for Rugby League imo. Not everyone is a superstar. The more blokes who can make good money the better.
Spewing if you were on the other minimum wage of 120 and now those guys are getting more than you....
 
Top