of course it does.Or has the game changed that much.Honestly, I dont think defence really comes into it.
Their all NRL players, they have to be able to tackle.
oh no....Carney is terrible in defence
of course it does.Or has the game changed that much.
Im sure flanno will give it some serious thought when weighing his options up
Honestly, I dont think defence really comes into it.
Their all NRL players, they have to be able to tackle.
Carney is terrible in defence
Like Soward for instance?
.
Honestly, I dont think defence really comes into it.
Their all NRL players, they have to be able to tackle.
I can't believe I'm gonna stick up for Jamie Soward, but here it goes.
Are you seriously saying Soward can't tackle?
Now I know it's not the strongest part of his game, but besides that night when Inglis owned him, I think he has aimed up.
There is no way you can play origin if your a dead set liability in defense.
Anyway back to my original point - our halves will judged on what they create and their organising ability. Not whether they are good defenders.
It should definately be carney@6 and graham@7
Watched a couple of replays today. Really think Carney 6 & Chad 7.
Chad will continue to develop, a young guy with talent. Graham to lock & move Gall to up the scrum.
Graham to play an Anasta type role when I guess it worked for them in 2010. Really don't think think that Graham is a long term 7. To big.
Stapo is a loss as I reckon he would have had a wing spot stitched up. There are options. Both Gordon & Mills have the talent to be week in week out 1st graders.
absolutely and can not be underestimated when considering this threadDefence has been one of our biggest issues.