Suuuure. He was ok tonight. Been diabolical in every other game for the last 4 years.Suck my dick from the back
At least you agreed to it.Suuuure. He was ok tonight. Been diabolical in every other game for the last 4 years.
Any port in a stormAt least you agreed to it.
Hopefully France is watchingFunny how people play better for a contract
I would agree. I was thinking he put in a good game. defence was alot bettersolid game from him, really lead from the front and took to to keon
Remind me what he’s on?a good game, great……still nowhere near the paycheck.
And a couple of decent games in a number of years is still subpar……for mine….
Plus a portion of what he is on wouldn't even count towards the cap for the veteran allowance, isn't that still a thing?Remind me what he’s on?
It’s still a thing.Plus a portion of what he is on wouldn't even count towards the cap for the veteran allowance, isn't that still a thing?
But it's only for 10 year plus players isn't it?It’s still a thing.
Disregard it, don’t factor it into how you think about any one player.
It’s just part of the cap every team has, if we don’t have it pencilled against Wade we’d just have it on someone else
No it’s not for that, you’ll have to Google or find where I’ve explained it here before as I’m too busy at the moment hahaBut it's only for 10 year plus players isn't it?
How many 10 year players are in our squad? If it wasn't Wade using it up, I don't think we would have another eligible player to use it. Wade's the only players remaining from 2016.
If he's on a hypothetical 350k, and 100k (or what ever the value is) is not included in the cap then essentially (for salary cap purposes) you're only paying that player 250k.
I can't imagine he would be too far above the minimum wage, if you subtract that.
Yes, he is still getting paid that total value. But relative to the teams salary cap, his performance is probably proportional I would say.
No.But it's only for 10 year plus players isn't it?
How many 10 year players are in our squad? If it wasn't Wade using it up, I don't think we would have another eligible player to use it. Wade's the only players remaining from 2016.
If he's on a hypothetical 350k, and 100k (or what ever the value is) is not included in the cap then essentially (for salary cap purposes) you're only paying that player 250k.
I can't imagine he would be too far above the minimum wage, if you subtract that.
Yes, he is still getting paid that total value. But relative to the teams salary cap, his performance is probably proportional I would say.